Axel.Thimm at ATrpms
Feb 22, 2009, 10:06 AM
Post #4 of 4
(1688 views)
Permalink
|
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 09:38:47AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 3:56 AM, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm [at] atrpms> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 12:41:58AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> > > [cascavel:~/RPMS104/nvidia/nvidia-graphics180-29] irpm
> > > nvidia-graphics-devel-180.29-31.x86_64.rpm
> > > error: Failed dependencies:
> > > mesa-libGL conflicts with
> > nvidia-graphics-devel-2:180.29-31.x86_64
> > > mesa-libGL-devel conflicts with
> > > nvidia-graphics-devel-2:180.29-31.x86_64
> >
> > yes, I'm aware - I'm looking for a way to package up
> > nvidia-graphics-devel to be just installed and mplayer/mythtv properly
> > pick up vdpau support.
> >
>
> Why does not ldconfig for running time, and supplying paths for
> compiling, work?
OK, I'll do that.
> The previous scheme has been working without conflicting to anything for
> years.
Nothing was really building against nvidia libs since xvmcw for that
long. With vdpau this changes, and I thought that one could create a
drop-in like in old times. But it looks too complicated and the path
to add vdpau -I/-L extra flags to apps seems easier to go.
At the very least the nvidia-graphics-devel package needs to provide
versionless variants for -I and -L to use.
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
|
