Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: atrpms: devel

Asterisk & co

 

 

atrpms devel RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


tim.verhoeven.be at gmail

Jan 30, 2009, 5:05 AM

Post #1 of 2 (949 views)
Permalink
Asterisk & co

Hi,

It seems that Asterisk isn't build anymore for EL 5. And I was
wondering why ? I'm making updated Asterisk packages as we speak so
maybe I can fix the problem in one go. I'm also going to make the new
Asterisk packages use the new dahdi support.

I'm also updating the misdn and misdnuser packages. And I have a
question related to that. I'm trying to test building those packages
localy but I can't seem to be able to build kmdl's. I'm doing this all
on C5.2 and using mock (I've tried both with 0.6.13 and 0.9.11). I've
added the atrpms-rpm-config package to the chroot and the related rpm
spec files are all there. But it seems that a dependency to the
correct kernel isn't added by the rpm macros. I'm probably missing
something but I have no idea what. I've also used the mock_kmdl.sh
script from "http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/LCG_kernel_modules.html"
but didn't change anything.

Any hints ?

Thanks,
Tim

--
Tim Verhoeven - tim.verhoeven.be [at] gmail - 0479 / 88 11 83

Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
"microsoft approach to programming" and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds)

_______________________________________________
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel [at] atrpms
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel


Axel.Thimm at ATrpms

Jan 30, 2009, 5:13 AM

Post #2 of 2 (876 views)
Permalink
Re: Asterisk & co [In reply to]

Hi Tim,

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 02:05:00PM +0100, Tim Verhoeven wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems that Asterisk isn't build anymore for EL 5. And I was
> wondering why ? I'm making updated Asterisk packages as we speak so
> maybe I can fix the problem in one go. I'm also going to make the new
> Asterisk packages use the new dahdi support.

I also working on asterisk since a couple of days :)
Let's coordinate, my current specfiles are under

http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/asterisk-20090130/?C=M;O=D

> I'm also updating the misdn and misdnuser packages.

That's great, as I didn't have any time yet to look into them!

> And I have a question related to that. I'm trying to test building
> those packages localy but I can't seem to be able to build
> kmdl's. I'm doing this all on C5.2 and using mock (I've tried both
> with 0.6.13 and 0.9.11). I've added the atrpms-rpm-config package to
> the chroot and the related rpm spec files are all there. But it
> seems that a dependency to the correct kernel isn't added by the rpm
> macros. I'm probably missing something but I have no idea what. I've
> also used the mock_kmdl.sh script from
> "http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/LCG_kernel_modules.html" but
> didn't change anything.
>
> Any hints ?

How do the dependencies look like, e.g. what does

rpm -qRp foo-kmdl-...rpm

return?

It should give something like

# rpm -qRp nvidia-graphics180.22-kmdl-2.6.18-128.el5-180.22-106.el5.x86_64.rpm
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-128.el5
/sbin/depmod
modutils >= 2.4.14
nvidia-graphics-devices
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1

E.g. the /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-128.el5 dependency.
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

atrpms devel RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.