
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms
Dec 20, 2008, 2:22 PM
Post #6 of 6
(947 views)
Permalink
|
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 07:49:02PM -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm [at] atrpms> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 04:59:25PM -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm [at] atrpms> > > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 09:43:17PM -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > > > > > > > http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/vlc-0.9.8a-34.fc8.src.rpm<http://people.atrpms.net/%7Epcavalcanti/srpms/vlc-0.9.8a-34.fc8.src.rpm> > > <http://people.atrpms.net/%7Epcavalcanti/srpms/vlc-0.9.8a-34.fc8.src.rpm> > > > > > > > > Thanks, it doesn't seem to build here, I get: > > > > > I am using > > > > > > [cascavel:~/RPMS104/atrpms] qrpm portaudio > > > portaudio-19-5.fc8.x86_64 > > > portaudio-devel-19-5.fc8.x86_64 > > > > > > from Fedora. > > > > > > You should be using portaudio-18, right? > > > Why do you still need portaudio-18? > > > > I don't think I used portaudio-18, the buildsystem picks the highest > > evr, so it picked the version in Fedora. > > > > Axel, > > I have no other explanation. The spec file is the same of the previous > version. > Can you check in the log, which version has been installed? > > I have just rebuilt it with mock, and had no problem at all.... I'll rebuild and have all used packages spit out their version/release, so we can compare. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
|