Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Apache: Dev

[Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release

  

 
Apache dev RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


wrowe at rowe-clan

Aug 21, 2012, 12:25 PM

Post #1 of 19 (1352 views)
Permalink
[Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release
Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
(x86 binary distribution and -win32-src.zip) will follow sometime later
this evening.

Feedback and edits to the draft announcement are greatly appreciated,
since we need to better position 2.2 as 'just maintenance' and we can
drop some of the 'shiny new' bits of that Announcement text, given that
it is old hat now, and they should be reading the 2.4 Announce (which
this document now links to).

So, for your consideration, a vote...

+/-1
[ ] Release httpd 2.2.23 as GA


info at apachelounge

Aug 22, 2012, 5:31 AM

Post #2 of 19 (1320 views)
Permalink
Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release [In reply to]
All looks fine on Windows.

Steffen

-----Original Message-----
From: William A. Rowe Jr.
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 9:25 PM Newsgroups: gmane.comp.apache.devel
To: dev [at] httpd
Subject: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release

Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
(x86 binary distribution and -win32-src.zip) will follow sometime later
this evening.

Feedback and edits to the draft announcement are greatly appreciated,
since we need to better position 2.2 as 'just maintenance' and we can
drop some of the 'shiny new' bits of that Announcement text, given that
it is old hat now, and they should be reading the 2.4 Announce (which
this document now links to).

So, for your consideration, a vote...

+/-1
[ ] Release httpd 2.2.23 as GA


trawick at gmail

Aug 22, 2012, 6:16 PM

Post #3 of 19 (1316 views)
Permalink
Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release [In reply to]
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:25 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
<wrowe [at] rowe-clan> wrote:
> Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
> these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
> (x86 binary distribution and -win32-src.zip) will follow sometime later
> this evening.
>
> Feedback and edits to the draft announcement are greatly appreciated,
> since we need to better position 2.2 as 'just maintenance' and we can
> drop some of the 'shiny new' bits of that Announcement text, given that
> it is old hat now, and they should be reading the 2.4 Announce (which
> this document now links to).
>
> So, for your consideration, a vote...

[+1] Release httpd 2.2.23 as GA

I get this testing both 2.2.22 and 2.2.23 on Linux 64-bit:

# Failed test 2 in t/security/CVE-2008-2364.t at line 19
# Failed test 3 in t/security/CVE-2008-2364.t at line 22


rainer.jung at kippdata

Aug 23, 2012, 12:51 AM

Post #4 of 19 (1308 views)
Permalink
Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release [In reply to]
On 23.08.2012 03:16, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:25 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> <wrowe [at] rowe-clan> wrote:
>> Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
>> these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
>> (x86 binary distribution and -win32-src.zip) will follow sometime later
>> this evening.
>>
>> Feedback and edits to the draft announcement are greatly appreciated,
>> since we need to better position 2.2 as 'just maintenance' and we can
>> drop some of the 'shiny new' bits of that Announcement text, given that
>> it is old hat now, and they should be reading the 2.4 Announce (which
>> this document now links to).
>>
>> So, for your consideration, a vote...
>
> [+1] Release httpd 2.2.23 as GA
>
> I get this testing both 2.2.22 and 2.2.23 on Linux 64-bit:
>
> # Failed test 2 in t/security/CVE-2008-2364.t at line 19
> # Failed test 3 in t/security/CVE-2008-2364.t at line 22

Me too, but these happen for me only when I use a very recent Perl. The
tests fail, because the Perl client reads status 100 instead of 200
resp. 502. Checking our logs indicates we did send the right status
codes. So this seems to be a test framework problem (and as you already
stated not a regression).

Regards,

Rainer


ruediger.pluem at vodafone

Aug 23, 2012, 12:54 AM

Post #5 of 19 (1306 views)
Permalink
RE: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release [In reply to]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:trawick [at] gmail]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 23. August 2012 03:17
> To: dev [at] httpd
> Subject: Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:25 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> <wrowe [at] rowe-clan> wrote:
> > Candidate binaries are available from
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
> > these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
> > (x86 binary distribution and -win32-src.zip) will follow sometime
> later
> > this evening.
> >
> > Feedback and edits to the draft announcement are greatly appreciated,
> > since we need to better position 2.2 as 'just maintenance' and we can
> > drop some of the 'shiny new' bits of that Announcement text, given
> that
> > it is old hat now, and they should be reading the 2.4 Announce (which
> > this document now links to).
> >
> > So, for your consideration, a vote...
>
> [+1] Release httpd 2.2.23 as GA
>
> I get this testing both 2.2.22 and 2.2.23 on Linux 64-bit:
>
> # Failed test 2 in t/security/CVE-2008-2364.t at line 19
> # Failed test 3 in t/security/CVE-2008-2364.t at line 22

Hm. Which Linux? I have never seen these on Centos 64 Bit.

Regards

Rüdiger


ruediger.pluem at vodafone

Aug 23, 2012, 12:57 AM

Post #6 of 19 (1312 views)
Permalink
RE: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release [In reply to]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
> Sent: Donnerstag, 23. August 2012 09:55
> To: dev [at] httpd
> Subject: RE: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:trawick [at] gmail]
> > Sent: Donnerstag, 23. August 2012 03:17
> > To: dev [at] httpd
> > Subject: Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:25 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> > <wrowe [at] rowe-clan> wrote:
> > > Candidate binaries are available from
> > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
> > > these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
> > > (x86 binary distribution and -win32-src.zip) will follow sometime
> > later
> > > this evening.
> > >
> > > Feedback and edits to the draft announcement are greatly
> appreciated,
> > > since we need to better position 2.2 as 'just maintenance' and we
> can
> > > drop some of the 'shiny new' bits of that Announcement text, given
> > that
> > > it is old hat now, and they should be reading the 2.4 Announce
> (which
> > > this document now links to).
> > >
> > > So, for your consideration, a vote...
> >
> > [+1] Release httpd 2.2.23 as GA
> >
> > I get this testing both 2.2.22 and 2.2.23 on Linux 64-bit:
> >
> > # Failed test 2 in t/security/CVE-2008-2364.t at line 19
> > # Failed test 3 in t/security/CVE-2008-2364.t at line 22
>
> Hm. Which Linux? I have never seen these on Centos 64 Bit.

Perl used on Centos (5):

Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 8 subversion 8) configuration:

Regards

Rüdiger


rainer.jung at kippdata

Aug 23, 2012, 1:41 AM

Post #7 of 19 (1309 views)
Permalink
Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release [In reply to]
On 23.08.2012 09:57, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
>> Sent: Donnerstag, 23. August 2012 09:55
>> To: dev [at] httpd
>> Subject: RE: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release
>>
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:trawick [at] gmail]
>>> Sent: Donnerstag, 23. August 2012 03:17
>>> To: dev [at] httpd
>>> Subject: Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:25 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>>> <wrowe [at] rowe-clan> wrote:
>>>> Candidate binaries are available from
>>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
>>>> these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
>>>> (x86 binary distribution and -win32-src.zip) will follow sometime
>>> later
>>>> this evening.
>>>>
>>>> Feedback and edits to the draft announcement are greatly
>> appreciated,
>>>> since we need to better position 2.2 as 'just maintenance' and we
>> can
>>>> drop some of the 'shiny new' bits of that Announcement text, given
>>> that
>>>> it is old hat now, and they should be reading the 2.4 Announce
>> (which
>>>> this document now links to).
>>>>
>>>> So, for your consideration, a vote...
>>>
>>> [+1] Release httpd 2.2.23 as GA
>>>
>>> I get this testing both 2.2.22 and 2.2.23 on Linux 64-bit:
>>>
>>> # Failed test 2 in t/security/CVE-2008-2364.t at line 19
>>> # Failed test 3 in t/security/CVE-2008-2364.t at line 22
>>
>> Hm. Which Linux? I have never seen these on Centos 64 Bit.
>
> Perl used on Centos (5):
>
> Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 8 subversion 8) configuration:

It should be this

https://github.com/gisle/libwww-perl/commit/25f86ba92ebf3d0abcf45cfda1880a1a12a91a0b

change in LWP. Changed on April 11, 2011, so probably only part of the
latest LWP 6.0.3.

Jeff: can you confirm the your libwwww is indeed this latest version 6.0.3?

Regards,

Rainer


h.reindl at thelounge

Aug 23, 2012, 3:43 AM

Post #8 of 19 (1308 views)
Permalink
Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release [In reply to]
Am 21.08.2012 21:25, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
> Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
> these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
> (x86 binary distribution and -win32-src.zip) will follow sometime later
> this evening.
>
> Feedback and edits to the draft announcement are greatly appreciated,
> since we need to better position 2.2 as 'just maintenance' and we can
> drop some of the 'shiny new' bits of that Announcement text, given that
> it is old hat now, and they should be reading the 2.4 Announce (which
> this document now links to).
>
> So, for your consideration, a vote...
>
> [ +1 ] Release httpd 2.2.23 as GA

works as far as i can see under Fedora 16/17 x86_64 with
PHP5.3, modsec, mod_rewrite fine and "ab -c 100 -n 50000"
ran without any issue
Attachments: signature.asc (0.26 KB)


trawick at gmail

Aug 23, 2012, 4:29 AM

Post #9 of 19 (1306 views)
Permalink
Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release [In reply to]
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Rainer Jung <rainer.jung [at] kippdata> wrote:
> On 23.08.2012 09:57, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
>>> Sent: Donnerstag, 23. August 2012 09:55
>>> To: dev [at] httpd
>>> Subject: RE: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:trawick [at] gmail]
>>>> Sent: Donnerstag, 23. August 2012 03:17
>>>> To: dev [at] httpd
>>>> Subject: Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:25 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>>>> <wrowe [at] rowe-clan> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Candidate binaries are available from
>>>>
>>>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
>>>>>
>>>>> these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
>>>>> (x86 binary distribution and -win32-src.zip) will follow sometime
>>>>
>>>> later
>>>>>
>>>>> this evening.
>>>>>
>>>>> Feedback and edits to the draft announcement are greatly
>>>
>>> appreciated,
>>>>>
>>>>> since we need to better position 2.2 as 'just maintenance' and we
>>>
>>> can
>>>>>
>>>>> drop some of the 'shiny new' bits of that Announcement text, given
>>>>
>>>> that
>>>>>
>>>>> it is old hat now, and they should be reading the 2.4 Announce
>>>
>>> (which
>>>>>
>>>>> this document now links to).
>>>>>
>>>>> So, for your consideration, a vote...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [+1] Release httpd 2.2.23 as GA
>>>>
>>>> I get this testing both 2.2.22 and 2.2.23 on Linux 64-bit:
>>>>
>>>> # Failed test 2 in t/security/CVE-2008-2364.t at line 19
>>>> # Failed test 3 in t/security/CVE-2008-2364.t at line 22
>>>
>>>
>>> Hm. Which Linux? I have never seen these on Centos 64 Bit.
>>
>>
>> Perl used on Centos (5):
>>
>> Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 8 subversion 8) configuration:
>
>
> It should be this
>
> https://github.com/gisle/libwww-perl/commit/25f86ba92ebf3d0abcf45cfda1880a1a12a91a0b
>
> change in LWP. Changed on April 11, 2011, so probably only part of the
> latest LWP 6.0.3.
>
> Jeff: can you confirm the your libwwww is indeed this latest version 6.0.3?

$ perl -MLWP -le "print(LWP->VERSION)"
6.04

>
> Regards,
>
> Rainer
>



--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/


rainer.jung at kippdata

Aug 23, 2012, 4:53 AM

Post #10 of 19 (1308 views)
Permalink
Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release [In reply to]
On 23.08.2012 13:29, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Rainer Jung <rainer.jung [at] kippdata> wrote:
>> On 23.08.2012 09:57, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
>>>> Sent: Donnerstag, 23. August 2012 09:55
>>>> To: dev [at] httpd
>>>> Subject: RE: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:trawick [at] gmail]
>>>>> Sent: Donnerstag, 23. August 2012 03:17
>>>>> To: dev [at] httpd
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:25 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>>>>> <wrowe [at] rowe-clan> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Candidate binaries are available from
>>>>>
>>>>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
>>>>>>
>>>>>> these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
>>>>>> (x86 binary distribution and -win32-src.zip) will follow sometime
>>>>>
>>>>> later
>>>>>>
>>>>>> this evening.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Feedback and edits to the draft announcement are greatly
>>>>
>>>> appreciated,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> since we need to better position 2.2 as 'just maintenance' and we
>>>>
>>>> can
>>>>>>
>>>>>> drop some of the 'shiny new' bits of that Announcement text, given
>>>>>
>>>>> that
>>>>>>
>>>>>> it is old hat now, and they should be reading the 2.4 Announce
>>>>
>>>> (which
>>>>>>
>>>>>> this document now links to).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, for your consideration, a vote...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [+1] Release httpd 2.2.23 as GA
>>>>>
>>>>> I get this testing both 2.2.22 and 2.2.23 on Linux 64-bit:
>>>>>
>>>>> # Failed test 2 in t/security/CVE-2008-2364.t at line 19
>>>>> # Failed test 3 in t/security/CVE-2008-2364.t at line 22
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hm. Which Linux? I have never seen these on Centos 64 Bit.
>>>
>>>
>>> Perl used on Centos (5):
>>>
>>> Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 8 subversion 8) configuration:
>>
>>
>> It should be this
>>
>> https://github.com/gisle/libwww-perl/commit/25f86ba92ebf3d0abcf45cfda1880a1a12a91a0b
>>
>> change in LWP. Changed on April 11, 2011, so probably only part of the
>> latest LWP 6.0.3.
>>
>> Jeff: can you confirm the your libwwww is indeed this latest version 6.0.3?
>
> $ perl -MLWP -le "print(LWP->VERSION)"
> 6.04

OK, even newer. Wasn't in the tag list for LWP in their git, so I
thought 6.0.3 was latest. But the suspect code is also in 6.0.4. So I'd
say the test failure is a result of the above change in Perl LWP. No
idea though, how the test framework could work around this.

Regards,

Rainer


jim at jaguNET

Aug 23, 2012, 5:00 AM

Post #11 of 19 (1306 views)
Permalink
Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release [In reply to]
I get the same w/ OSX 10.8

On Aug 22, 2012, at 9:16 PM, Jeff Trawick <trawick [at] gmail> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:25 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> <wrowe [at] rowe-clan> wrote:
>> Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
>> these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
>> (x86 binary distribution and -win32-src.zip) will follow sometime later
>> this evening.
>>
>> Feedback and edits to the draft announcement are greatly appreciated,
>> since we need to better position 2.2 as 'just maintenance' and we can
>> drop some of the 'shiny new' bits of that Announcement text, given that
>> it is old hat now, and they should be reading the 2.4 Announce (which
>> this document now links to).
>>
>> So, for your consideration, a vote...
>
> [+1] Release httpd 2.2.23 as GA
>
> I get this testing both 2.2.22 and 2.2.23 on Linux 64-bit:
>
> # Failed test 2 in t/security/CVE-2008-2364.t at line 19
> # Failed test 3 in t/security/CVE-2008-2364.t at line 22
>


rainer.jung at kippdata

Aug 23, 2012, 12:58 PM

Post #12 of 19 (1301 views)
Permalink
Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release [In reply to]
On 21.08.2012 21:25, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
> these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
> (x86 binary distribution and -win32-src.zip) will follow sometime later
> this evening.
>
> Feedback and edits to the draft announcement are greatly appreciated,
> since we need to better position 2.2 as 'just maintenance' and we can
> drop some of the 'shiny new' bits of that Announcement text, given that
> it is old hat now, and they should be reading the 2.4 Announce (which
> this document now links to).
>
> So, for your consideration, a vote...
>
> +/-1
> [+1] Release httpd 2.2.23 as GA

Build problems:

Build problems on SLES 10 when using bundled APR and OpenSSL 1.0.1c as
static libs. It's due to a bug in pkg-config on SuSe Linux, which does
not preserve order of -l flags when a.pc file also contains a
Libs.private entry. I built a pkg-config 0.23 which contains a patch for
that and the problem was gone. Not httpd's fault.

Problem with configure on Linux when using external PCRE in a non-system
path. configure puts -lpcre into the LIBS early and the later tests all
fail, when they try to run the contest binary, because the pcre lib can
not be found. IT#s a bit unfortunate, that all libs needed to build
httpd are added as libs during all configure tests after the respective
--with flag. Workaround is setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH just during
configure. Works out of the box on Solaris, because "pcre-config --libs"
on Solaris also outputs a "-R" flag.

Test suite:

Two failures only happen when I use a very recent LWP Perl module
(version 6.0.3 and above): tests 2+3 in t/security/CVE-2008-2364.t fail,
because the Perl client reads status 100 instead of 200 resp. 502.
Checking our logs indicates we did send the right status codes. So this
seems to be a test framework problem. Don't know how a workaround in the
framework would be.

Failed test 2 in t/ssl/extlookup.t and 9 in t/ssl/require.t - not a
regression.

Details:

- win32 artefacts not checked, because not yet available
- Signature and Hashes OK
- key in KEYS file
- gz and bz2 contents identical
- no unexpected diff to svn tag
- built and tested on
- Solaris 8+10 Sparc
- SuSE Linux Enterprise 10 (32Bit and 64Bit)
- SLES 11 (64 Bit)
- RedHat Enterprise Linux 5/6 64Bit
- builds fine using gcc
- out of tree
- with "all", "most" and default module sets
- with either default (static) or shared linked modules
- MPMs prefork, worker, event (where applicable)
- dependencies apr/apu/expat/pcre/openssl:
a) all bundled
b) 1.4.6/1.4.1/2.1.0/8.30/1.0.1c
- configure fails for external non system pcre
(see above)
- test suite ran for all those builds with log levels
info and debug
- no test regressions w.r.t. at least 2.2.16-2.2.22:
- Failed test 2 in t/ssl/extlookup.t at line 27
- Failed test 9 in t/ssl/require.t at line 44
For details about both see my 2.2.19 voting mail.
- Failed tests 2+3 in t/security/CVE-2008-2364.t when
using LWP 6.0.3 or above

Regards,

Rainer


covener at gmail

Aug 23, 2012, 7:03 PM

Post #13 of 19 (1303 views)
Permalink
Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release [In reply to]
+1 AIX/XLC/PPC64


fuankg at apache

Aug 25, 2012, 9:26 AM

Post #14 of 19 (1270 views)
Permalink
Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release [In reply to]
+1 NetWare

Gün.


mamfelt at gmail

Aug 27, 2012, 6:42 AM

Post #15 of 19 (1250 views)
Permalink
Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release [In reply to]
FYI: I get an error message from configure that I do not understand.

+ ./configure
--enable-layout=AIX
--with-apr=/opt/bin/apr-1-config
--with-apr-util=/opt/bin/apu-1-config
--with-mpm=worker
--enable-ssl
--enable-mods-shared=all > build/aix/configure.out
Package openssl was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `openssl.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
No package 'openssl' found

However, the packaging proceeds fine. And I get an
"It Works" message.

Will add "beta" in name in http://dl.aixtools.net/httpd

p.s. If it is not appropriate to add a URL by non-ASF - please slap gently
:)


fuankg at apache

Aug 27, 2012, 6:58 AM

Post #16 of 19 (1245 views)
Permalink
Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release [In reply to]
Hi Michael,
Am 27.08.2012 15:42, schrieb Michael Felt:
> No package 'openssl' found
that means that most likely your build doesnt support https protocol.

> However, the packaging proceeds fine. And I get an
> "It Works" message.
yes, but have you checked https://.... too??

Gün.


sf at sfritsch

Aug 27, 2012, 1:30 PM

Post #17 of 19 (1247 views)
Permalink
Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release [In reply to]
[+1] Release httpd 2.2.23 as GA

Tested on Debian sid. I see the same (non-regression) test failures as
Rainer.

Cheers,
Stefan


mamfelt at gmail

Aug 29, 2012, 4:23 AM

Post #18 of 19 (1218 views)
Permalink
Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release [In reply to]
Not this time, but I have in the past. Need to automate the key-generation,
etc. for https:// - sounds like a ToDo!
Good reminder.

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Guenter Knauf <fuankg [at] apache> wrote:

> Hi Michael,
> Am 27.08.2012 15:42, schrieb Michael Felt:
>
>> No package 'openssl' found
>>
> that means that most likely your build doesnt support https protocol.
>
>
> However, the packaging proceeds fine. And I get an
>> "It Works" message.
>>
> yes, but have you checked https://.... too??
>
> Gün.
>
>
>


mamfelt at gmail

Aug 29, 2012, 4:43 AM

Post #19 of 19 (1220 views)
Permalink
Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release [In reply to]
Guenter,

working on it - after generating a test key, turning on two mod_'s and
adding extra/*ssl.conf I was able to do:

$ openssl s_client -connect localhost:443 -state -debug
GET / HTTP/1.0

snip - from end:
00d0 - 99 7a 90 ca 1c 28 b4 3e-a9 af 26 d4 cd 33 88 99 .z...(.>..&..3..
00e0 - bf de f5 60 da 89 5a ac-04 f4 23 dc 5b 3f 16 cb ...`..Z...#.[.?..
00f0 - a2 57 7d d1 88 8d cb c5-c1 7d 6b bc 0e cb 17 03 .W}......}k.....
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
<html><head>
<title>408 Request Timeout</title>
</head><body>
<h1>Request Timeout</h1>
<p>Server timeout waiting for the HTTP request from the client.</p>
</body></html>
read from 0x20050b38 [0x20056108] (5 bytes => 0 (0x0))
read:errno=0
write to 0x20050b38 [0x2005a918] (37 bytes => 37 (0x25))
0000 - 15 03 01 00 20 30 26 15-ec 9a 2e 90 65 49 db 2f .... 0&.....eI./
0010 - 80 40 bc df 8a 90 63 d3-32 d1 0b 90 07 d2 ed b8 .@....c.2.......
0020 - a8 0d d0 17 94 .....
SSL3 alert write:warning:close notify
michael [at] x05:[/etc/httpd/extra]

So, it seems I still do not understand the error message - openssl seems to
be integrated.

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Michael Felt <mamfelt [at] gmail> wrote:

> Not this time, but I have in the past. Need to automate the
> key-generation, etc. for https:// - sounds like a ToDo!
> Good reminder.
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Guenter Knauf <fuankg [at] apache> wrote:
>
>> Hi Michael,
>> Am 27.08.2012 15:42, schrieb Michael Felt:
>>
>>> No package 'openssl' found
>>>
>> that means that most likely your build doesnt support https protocol.
>>
>>
>> However, the packaging proceeds fine. And I get an
>>> "It Works" message.
>>>
>> yes, but have you checked https://.... too??
>>
>> Gün.
>>
>>
>>
>

Apache dev RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.