ruediger.pluem at vodafone
Jul 25, 2012, 5:12 AM
Post #3 of 4
> -----Original Message-----
RE: DavGenericLockDB scope - what should it be?
[In reply to]
> From: Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
> Sent: Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2012 14:06
> To: dev [at] httpd
> Subject: RE: DavGenericLockDB scope - what should it be?
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Graham Leggett [mailto:minfrin [at] sharp]
> > Sent: Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2012 13:36
> > To: dev [at] httpd
> > Subject: DavGenericLockDB scope - what should it be?
> > Hi all,
> > According to the docs at
> > the scope of the DavGenericLockDB is "server config, virtual host,
> > directory".
> > According to the source, the scope is "inside Directory or Location"
> > follows:
> > AP_INIT_TAKE1("DAVGenericLockDB", dav_lock_cmd_davlockdb, NULL,
> > ACCESS_CONF,
> > "specify a lock database"),
> > Can anyone confirm which one is supposed to be correct?
> For me the directive seems to work on server level as well (at least I
> get no error
> on startup when using it on server level), but I don't know if the
> locking is really (still)
> used by Subversion (mod_dav_svn) as I see no lock DB created.
Answering myself. Later version of mod_dav_svn have their own locking implemented.