rainer.jung at kippdata
Jul 22, 2012, 5:48 AM
Post #1 of 1
(83 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: svn commit: r1241953 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/INSTALL
|
|
Hi Jim,
On 08.02.2012 17:01, jim [at] apache wrote:
> Author: jim
> Date: Wed Feb 8 16:01:34 2012
> New Revision: 1241953
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1241953&view=rev
> Log:
> remove -deps info from INSTALL
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/INSTALL
>
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/INSTALL
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/INSTALL?rev=1241953&r1=1241952&r2=1241953&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/INSTALL (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/INSTALL Wed Feb 8 16:01:34 2012
> @@ -18,16 +18,18 @@
> quotes).
>
> * Consider if you want to use a previously installed APR and
> - APR-Util (such as those provided with many OSes) or if
> - you need to use the APR and APR-Util from the
> - httpd-2.4.x-deps.tar.gz tarball via ./configure's
> - --with-included-apr option. This is required if you don't
> - have the compiler which the system APR was built with. It
> - can also be advantageous if you are a developer who will be
> - linking your code with Apache or using a debugger to step
> - through server code, as it removes the possibility of
> - version or compile-option mismatches with APR and APR-util
> - code.
> + APR-Util (such as those provided with many OSes) or if you
> + need to use the APR and APR-Util from the apr.apache.org
> + project. If the latter, download the latest versions and
> + unpack them to ./srclib/apr and ./srclib/apr-util (no
> + version numbers in the directory names) and use
> + ./configure's --with-included-apr option. This is required
> + if you don't have the compiler which the system APR was
> + built with. It can also be advantageous if you are a
> + developer who will be linking your code with Apache or using
> + a debugger to step through server code, as it removes the
> + possibility of version or compile-option mismatches with APR
> + and APR-util code.
Should this be ported byck to trunk? Or reverted from trunk? I lost
track, what the final conclusions about the deps tarball was.
Regards,
Rainer
|
