sf at sfritsch
Jun 22, 2012, 8:21 AM
Post #3 of 4
On Friday 22 June 2012, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Re: LimitRequestFieldSize: spurious note about max value?
[In reply to]
> On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:42 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> > Docs contain this note for LimitRequestFieldSize directive:
> > <note>Under normal conditions, the value should not be
> > changed from the default. Also, you can't set this higher
> > than 8190 without modifying the source code and
> > rebuilding.</note>
> > I was under the impression that the hardcoded upper limit was
> > removed in r149269. No?
> So, nobody will mind if I remove that comment from the docs then? I
> think I have commit there, although never really tried...