Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Apache: Dev

[VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA

 

 

Apache dev RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


jim at jaguNET

Apr 5, 2012, 5:24 AM

Post #1 of 20 (669 views)
Permalink
[VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA

The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found
at the usual place:

http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/

I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.2 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
of the official release.

[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.

Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.


mamfelt at gmail

Apr 6, 2012, 7:27 AM

Post #2 of 20 (654 views)
Permalink
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA [In reply to]

my vote "does not count", but I have been able to build with vac.C v7 and
v11 with no changes

using gcc-4.6.3 needed some tweaking as apr is dependent upon compiler
used.

The apachectl -t "test" is successful on all three.

+1

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Jim Jagielski <jim [at] jagunet> wrote:

> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.2 GA.
> NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
> easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
> of the official release.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
>
> Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.
>


jim at jaguNET

Apr 6, 2012, 9:39 AM

Post #3 of 20 (660 views)
Permalink
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA [In reply to]

On Apr 5, 2012, at 8:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.2 GA.
> NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
> easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
> of the official release.
>
> [X] +1: Good to go

+1 on Fed16, OSX (Xcode 4.3.2), FreeBSD 8.2-p6


noel.butler at ausics

Apr 6, 2012, 7:48 PM

Post #4 of 20 (655 views)
Permalink
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA [In reply to]

On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 12:39 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:

> On Apr 5, 2012, at 8:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found
> > at the usual place:
> >
> > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
> >
> > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.2 GA.
> > NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
> > easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
> > of the official release.
> >
> > [X] +1: Good to go
>
> +1 on Fed16, OSX (Xcode 4.3.2), FreeBSD 8.2-p6


+1 Slackware 13.1 , 13.37
Attachments: signature.asc (0.48 KB)


covener at gmail

Apr 7, 2012, 10:53 AM

Post #5 of 20 (655 views)
Permalink
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA [In reply to]

>> [X] +1: Good to go
>

+1 on AIX / xlc / PPC64, no regressions.

(100% other than SSL, not normally loaded on my AIX regression)


info at apachelounge

Apr 7, 2012, 12:57 PM

Post #6 of 20 (660 views)
Permalink
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA [In reply to]

Tested and used by quite some users at AL.

All building and running good on all the flavors (Win32 and Win64 with VC9
and VC10).

Build with IPv6 and Crypto enabled and the deps:
apr-1.4.6 (patched) apr-util-1.4.1 apr-iconv-1.2.1 openssl-1.0.1-and-0.9.8u
zlib-1.2.6 pcre-8.30 libxml2-2.7.8 lua-5.1.5 expat-2.1.0

Steffen



ps,
The AcceptFilter none is still an issue, as reported.



-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Jagielski
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 2:24 PM Newsgroups: gmane.comp.apache.devel
To: dev [at] httpd
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA

The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found
at the usual place:

http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/

I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.2 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
of the official release.

[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.

Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.


sf at sfritsch

Apr 9, 2012, 4:56 AM

Post #7 of 20 (646 views)
Permalink
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA [In reply to]

On Thursday 05 April 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.2 GA.
> NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
> easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
> of the official release.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
>
> Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.

+1

tested on Debian sid with system apr/apr-util and with --with-
included-apr


i.galic at brainsware

Apr 10, 2012, 6:13 AM

Post #8 of 20 (641 views)
Permalink
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA [In reply to]

----- Original Message -----
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.2 GA.
> NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
> easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
> of the official release.
>
> [x] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
>
> Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.
>

Fedora 16/amd64. apr $latest stable.
Works fine with PHP, too.

i

--
Igor Galić

Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Mail: i.galic [at] brainsware
URL: http://brainsware.org/
GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515 2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE


jim at jaguNET

Apr 11, 2012, 7:22 AM

Post #9 of 20 (636 views)
Permalink
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA [In reply to]

I'm planning on letting the vote run for a few more days, just
in case, and, if all is well, we can announce on Monday.

Good news always should be announced early in the week :)

On Apr 5, 2012, at 8:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.2 GA.
> NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
> easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
> of the official release.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
>
> Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.
>


rainer.jung at kippdata

Apr 14, 2012, 2:18 AM

Post #10 of 20 (626 views)
Permalink
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA [In reply to]

On 05.04.2012 14:24, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.2 GA.
> NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
> easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
> of the official release.
>
> [X] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
>
> Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.

+1 for GA

Test Details:

- Sigs and hashes OK
- contents of tarballs identical
- contents of tag and tarballs identical
except for expected deltas
(we could cleanup some m4 files in apr-util/xml/expat/conftools
at the end of buildconf, no regression)

Built on

- Solaris 8+10 Sparc as 32 Bit Binaries
- SLES 10 (32/64 Bits)
- SLES 11 (64 Bits)
- RHEL 5 and 6 (64 Bits)

- with default (shared) and static modules
- with module sets none, few, most, all, reallyall and default
(always mod_privileges disabled)
- using --enable-load-all-modules
- against "included" APR/APU from deps tarball and
external APR/APU 1.4.6/1.4.1

- using external libraries
- expat 2.1.0
- pcre 8.30
- openssl 1.0.1
- lua 5.2.0
- distcache 1.5.1
- libxml2 2.7.8-1

- Tool chain:
- platform gcc except for Solaris
(gcc 4.1.2 for Solaris 8 and 4.6.2 for Solaris 10)
- CFLAGS: -O2 -g -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing
(and -mpcu=v9 on Solaris)

All builds succeeded except for

- SLES 10 many static builds stop with error or crash during
linking httpd IMHO because of too many commandline params
(not a regression)
- with "reallyall", "all" or "most" modules

Tested for

- Solaris 8+10 (32), SLES 10 (32/64), SLES 11 (64), RHEL 5+6 (64)
- MPMs prefork, worker, event (except for Solaris 8 - no event)
- default (shared) and static modules
- log levels info, debug and trace8
- module set reallyall

All Tests passed with the following exceptions:

a Test 5 in t/modules/dav.t:
4 out of 222 tested builds had the "created" time after
the "modified" time.
This seems to be a platform issue, all tests done on NFS,
many tested on virtualized guests.

b Test 8 in t/ssl/pr12355.t:
Of the more than 200 runs there was one that failed this test,
(on SLES 10). 60000 bytes were posted, but only 49126 bytes received
(a little less than 48K). Not reproducible, very rare.
PR 12355 is: POST incompatible w/ renegotiate https: connection

Both are not regressions (observed for 2.4.1 as well), are not strictly
reproducible and at least b is extremely rare.

Rainer


fuankg at apache

Apr 15, 2012, 4:10 AM

Post #11 of 20 (600 views)
Permalink
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA [In reply to]

Am 06.04.2012 18:39, schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>
> On Apr 5, 2012, at 8:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found
>> at the usual place:
>>
>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>>
>> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.2 GA.
>> NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
>> easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
>> of the official release.
I just found that a simple SSI .shtml does not work as plain text any
more as it did with 2.2.x;
f.e. an ip.shtml with:
<!--#echo var="REMOTE_ADDR"-->

gives me an empty reply with 2.4.2 while same works fine with 2.2.x;
if I surround the SSI with html tags like:
<html>
<!--#echo var="REMOTE_ADDR"-->
</html>

it works with 2.4.2 - is this now intented behavior, or am I missing
something in the config?

Gün.


noel.butler at ausics

Apr 15, 2012, 4:47 AM

Post #12 of 20 (600 views)
Permalink
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA [In reply to]

On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 13:10 +0200, Guenter Knauf wrote:

> <!--#echo var="REMOTE_ADDR"-->


Related to the removal of config option DefaultType perhaps?
Attachments: signature.asc (0.48 KB)


fuankg at apache

Apr 15, 2012, 9:36 AM

Post #13 of 20 (603 views)
Permalink
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA [In reply to]

Am 15.04.2012 13:47, schrieb Noel Butler:
> On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 13:10 +0200, Guenter Knauf wrote:
>> <!--#echo var="REMOTE_ADDR"-->
>
> Related to the removal of config option DefaultType perhaps?
maybe ...
however then I would assume that assigning
text/html shtml shtm
in conf/mime.types should fix it - but it doesnt - at least not for
NetWare; and even a
ForceType text/html
for the directory doesnt work for me, and
AddType text/html .shtml
doesnt either ...

so to me it looks as if either SSI or type assingment is currently
broken - at least on NetWare, not yet tested on other platforms ...

Gün.


rumble at cord

Apr 15, 2012, 9:54 AM

Post #14 of 20 (604 views)
Permalink
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA [In reply to]

On 15-04-2012 18:36, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Am 15.04.2012 13:47, schrieb Noel Butler:
>> On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 13:10 +0200, Guenter Knauf wrote:
>>> <!--#echo var="REMOTE_ADDR"-->
>>
>> Related to the removal of config option DefaultType perhaps?
> maybe ...
> however then I would assume that assigning
> text/html shtml shtm
> in conf/mime.types should fix it - but it doesnt - at least not for
> NetWare; and even a
> ForceType text/html
> for the directory doesnt work for me, and
> AddType text/html .shtml
> doesnt either ...
>
> so to me it looks as if either SSI or type assingment is currently
> broken - at least on NetWare, not yet tested on other platforms ...
>
> Gün.
>
>
I have tested your SSI tag with 2.4.2 on Debian 6 and Fedora 16 with the
following options set:

Options +Includes
AddType text/html .shtml
AddOutputFilter INCLUDES .shtml

Even without the html tags, this seems to work perfectly on the machines
I have tested it on, so it might just be a NetWare issue.

With regards,
Daniel.


h.reindl at thelounge

Apr 15, 2012, 10:10 AM

Post #15 of 20 (604 views)
Permalink
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA [In reply to]

Am 15.04.2012 18:54, schrieb Daniel Gruno:
>> so to me it looks as if either SSI or type assingment is currently
>> broken - at least on NetWare, not yet tested on other platforms ...
>>
> I have tested your SSI tag with 2.4.2 on Debian 6 and Fedora 16 with the
> following options set:
>
> Options +Includes
> AddType text/html .shtml
> AddOutputFilter INCLUDES .shtml
>
> Even without the html tags, this seems to work perfectly on the machines
> I have tested it on, so it might just be a NetWare issue

what is the reason to use Netware for a webserver?
besides the fact that there are so many operating
systems running httpd fine and Netware is EOL at all
Attachments: signature.asc (0.26 KB)


rainer.jung at kippdata

Apr 15, 2012, 11:58 AM

Post #16 of 20 (601 views)
Permalink
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA [In reply to]

On 15.04.2012 19:10, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 15.04.2012 18:54, schrieb Daniel Gruno:
>>> so to me it looks as if either SSI or type assingment is currently
>>> broken - at least on NetWare, not yet tested on other platforms ...
>>>
>> I have tested your SSI tag with 2.4.2 on Debian 6 and Fedora 16 with the
>> following options set:
>>
>> Options +Includes
>> AddType text/html .shtml
>> AddOutputFilter INCLUDES .shtml
>>
>> Even without the html tags, this seems to work perfectly on the machines
>> I have tested it on, so it might just be a NetWare issue
>
> what is the reason to use Netware for a webserver?
> besides the fact that there are so many operating
> systems running httpd fine and Netware is EOL at all

Please start a new thread if you want to discuss a new topic. This is
out of scope for the 2.4.2 release vote.

And most likely it would be better to discuss it on the user list.

Thank you.

Rainer


fuankg at apache

Apr 15, 2012, 4:20 PM

Post #17 of 20 (601 views)
Permalink
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA [In reply to]

Hi Daniel,
Am 15.04.2012 18:54, schrieb Daniel Gruno:
> I have tested your SSI tag with 2.4.2 on Debian 6 and Fedora 16 with the
> following options set:
>
> Options +Includes
> AddType text/html .shtml
> AddOutputFilter INCLUDES .shtml
>
> Even without the html tags, this seems to work perfectly on the machines
> I have tested it on, so it might just be a NetWare issue.
thanks for testing! SO I need to dig some deeper ...

Gün.


noel.butler at ausics

Apr 15, 2012, 6:38 PM

Post #18 of 20 (600 views)
Permalink
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA [In reply to]

This is NOT the list for starting OS wars on.


On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 19:10 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:


> what is the reason to use Netware for a webserver?
> besides the fact that there are so many operating
> systems running httpd fine and Netware is EOL at all
>
>
Attachments: signature.asc (0.48 KB)


i.galic at brainsware

Apr 16, 2012, 6:10 AM

Post #19 of 20 (597 views)
Permalink
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA [In reply to]

----- Original Message -----
> This is NOT the list for starting OS wars on.

Could you please point me to the correct list for that
kind of thing? (:

i

--
Igor Galić

Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Mail: i.galic [at] brainsware
URL: http://brainsware.org/
GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515 2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE


wrowe at rowe-clan

Apr 16, 2012, 6:17 AM

Post #20 of 20 (597 views)
Permalink
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA [In reply to]

On 4/16/2012 8:10 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> This is NOT the list for starting OS wars on.
>
> Could you please point me to the correct list for that
> kind of thing? (:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3AOperating_system_advocacy

That's been asked before ;-P

Apache dev RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.