Mailing List Archive: Apache: Dev

horray - snapshots are back again, but ....

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

fuankg at apache

Nov 3, 2009, 2:38 PM

Post #1 of 5 (570 views)
Permalink

horray - snapshots are back again, but ....

... viewvc is gone now :( hope we can restore that soon ....

also I would like to remind that some snapshot branches need changed, or
otherwise they are still useless:
http://svn.apache.org/snapshots/?F=0

-- apr-1.0.x
-- apr-iconv-1.0.x
-- apr-util-1.0.x
-- apr-util

++ apr-iconv-1.2.x
++ apr-1.3.x
++ apr-util-1.3.x
++ apr-1.4.x
++ apr-util-1.4.x
++ httpd-2.2.x
++ mod_jk
++ mod_ftp
++ mod_cgid

not sure about the docs, but probably also:
++ httpd-docs-2.2

Gün.

tony at pc-tony

Nov 3, 2009, 3:03 PM

Post #2 of 5 (534 views)
Permalink

Re: horray - snapshots are back again, but .... [In reply to]

I'm sorry, I dont understand what you want us to do. viewcv is
working, I just used it now.
As for the rest of your mail, you may need to explain it better.

Tony

On 3 Nov 2009, at 14:38, Guenter Knauf wrote:

> ... viewvc is gone now :( hope we can restore that soon ....
>
> also I would like to remind that some snapshot branches need
> changed, or
> otherwise they are still useless:
> http://svn.apache.org/snapshots/?F=0
>
> -- apr-1.0.x
> -- apr-iconv-1.0.x
> -- apr-util-1.0.x
> -- apr-util
>
> ++ apr-iconv-1.2.x
> ++ apr-1.3.x
> ++ apr-util-1.3.x
> ++ apr-1.4.x
> ++ apr-util-1.4.x
> ++ httpd-2.2.x
> ++ mod_jk
> ++ mod_ftp
> ++ mod_cgid
>
> not sure about the docs, but probably also:
> ++ httpd-docs-2.2
>
> Gün.
>
>

Cheers,
Tony

--------------------------------------------
Tony Stevenson

tony [at] pc-tony - pctony [at] apache
pctony [at] freenode - tony [at] caret

http://blog.pc-tony.com

1024D/51047D66
--------------------------------------------

fuankg at apache

Nov 3, 2009, 3:17 PM

Post #3 of 5 (532 views)
Permalink

Re: horray - snapshots are back again, but .... [In reply to]

Hi Tony,
Tony Stevenson schrieb:
> I'm sorry, I dont understand what you want us to do. viewcv is working,
> I just used it now.
huh? well, I used normally:
http://svn.apache.org/
where there was a viewvc link; now only snapshots show up there. Can you
then please give me your working link?

> As for the rest of your mail, you may need to explain it better.
well, very simple: what I listed below with -- are branches which are no
longer maintained, thus useless, while other branches marked with ++
which we *do* maintain are missing; as a sample see here the branches
I'm interested in (and most likely anyone else who uses snaps):
http://svwe20.itex.at/snapshots/
see also the file repositories.txt inside the tar.gz which I did send to
you directly.

Gün.

trawick at gmail

Nov 3, 2009, 4:47 PM

Post #4 of 5 (522 views)
Permalink

Re: horray - snapshots are back again, but .... [In reply to]

On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Guenter Knauf <fuankg [at] apache> wrote:
> Hi Tony,
> Tony Stevenson schrieb:
>> I'm sorry, I dont understand what you want us to do. viewcv is working,
>> I just used it now.
> huh? well, I used normally:
> http://svn.apache.org/
> where there was a viewvc link; now only snapshots show up there. Can you
> then please give me your working link?

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/

(not a new requirement)

fuankg at apache

Nov 3, 2009, 6:15 PM

Post #5 of 5 (541 views)
Permalink

Re: horray - snapshots are back again, but .... [In reply to]

Hi Jeff,
Jeff Trawick schrieb:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/
that's what I used all the time - but when I posted this didnt work, nor
was a link displayed at http://svn.apache.org/ - now its there again ...

Gün.

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads