Mailing List Archive: Apache: Dev

[VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta?

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

wrowe at rowe-clan

Sep 28, 2009, 8:28 PM

Post #1 of 15 (1115 views)
Permalink

[VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta?

Following Rainer's Solaris discoveries and our DISTDIR suggestions,

Please fetch up the newly prepared mod_ftp-0.9.6.tar.gz (or .bz2), or the
win32/netware/os2 suitable package mod_ftp-0.9.6-crlf.zip from;

http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_ftp/

review, take it for a spin, and cast your choice

[ ] -1 for any release of 0.9.6 (regressed from 0.9.2 or earlier?)
[ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6-beta
[ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6 GA

For getting started,

http://httpd.apache.org/mod_ftp/

and

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_ftp/tags/0.9.6/README-FTP

Bill

trawick at gmail

Sep 30, 2009, 5:57 AM

Post #2 of 15 (1079 views)
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta? [In reply to]

On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:28 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<wrowe [at] rowe-clan>wrote:

> Following Rainer's Solaris discoveries and our DISTDIR suggestions,
>
> Please fetch up the newly prepared mod_ftp-0.9.6.tar.gz (or .bz2), or the
> win32/netware/os2 suitable package mod_ftp-0.9.6-crlf.zip from;
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_ftp/
>
> review, take it for a spin, and cast your choice
>
> [ ] -1 for any release of 0.9.6 (regressed from 0.9.2 or earlier?)
> [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6-beta
> [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6 GA
>

+1 for beta
+ 0.5 for GA (I don't know enough about it to be more sure)

wrowe at rowe-clan

Oct 3, 2009, 9:15 AM

Post #3 of 15 (1069 views)
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta? [In reply to]

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> [X] +1 to release as 0.9.6-beta
> [x] +1 to release as 0.9.6 GA

Certainly ready for release as a beta, and looks as close to GA as needed to me.

[.Note this would be 0.9.6 GA, no promises of binary ABI compatibility from release
to release until we decided to bump it to 1.0.0.]

wrowe at rowe-clan

Oct 6, 2009, 1:06 AM

Post #4 of 15 (1061 views)
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta? [In reply to]

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Following Rainer's Solaris discoveries and our DISTDIR suggestions,
>
> Please fetch up the newly prepared mod_ftp-0.9.6.tar.gz (or .bz2), or the
> win32/netware/os2 suitable package mod_ftp-0.9.6-crlf.zip from;

7 days have passed, and although my first inclination is to declare the vote closed with
2 +1's and begin the dissolution of this effort, I'll leave the vote open three more days
before ending evaluation of this package and taking it to its logical conclusion.

ruediger.pluem at vodafone

Oct 6, 2009, 1:44 AM

Post #5 of 15 (1059 views)
Permalink

RE: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta? [In reply to]

+1 on beta

Regards

Rüdiger

> -----Original Message-----
> From: William A. Rowe, Jr.
> Sent: Dienstag, 29. September 2009 05:29
> To: testers [at] httpd; dev [at] httpd
> Subject: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta?
>
> Following Rainer's Solaris discoveries and our DISTDIR suggestions,
>
> Please fetch up the newly prepared mod_ftp-0.9.6.tar.gz (or
> .bz2), or the
> win32/netware/os2 suitable package mod_ftp-0.9.6-crlf.zip from;
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_ftp/
>
> review, take it for a spin, and cast your choice
>
> [ ] -1 for any release of 0.9.6 (regressed from 0.9.2 or earlier?)
> [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6-beta
> [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6 GA
>
> For getting started,
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/mod_ftp/
>
> and
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_ftp/tags/0.9.6/README-FTP
>
> Bill
>
>

fuankg at apache

Oct 6, 2009, 4:39 AM

Post #6 of 15 (1044 views)
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta? [In reply to]

William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb:
> Following Rainer's Solaris discoveries and our DISTDIR suggestions,
>
> Please fetch up the newly prepared mod_ftp-0.9.6.tar.gz (or .bz2), or the
> win32/netware/os2 suitable package mod_ftp-0.9.6-crlf.zip from;
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_ftp/
>
> review, take it for a spin, and cast your choice

[x] +1 to release as 0.9.6-beta

successfully tested on:
OpenSuSE 10.3-32, OpenSuSE 11.1-64
NetWare 6.5SP8 (with limitation for the non-working ephemeral port)

GÃ¼n.

fuankg at apache

Oct 6, 2009, 4:57 AM

Post #7 of 15 (1054 views)
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta? [In reply to]

William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb:
> For getting started,
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/mod_ftp/
perhaps something for the FAQ:
Q: Why does does the build-in ftp client of Firefox not work with some
configurations?
A: Due to stupid command sequences the Firefox internal ftp client fails
if you have subfolders in the ftproot. This seems a known bug (we found
others reporting same issue too at various places). As workaround either
use a separate ftp client like FileZilla, or use the Firefox Plugin FireFTP.

GÃ¼n.

jorge.schrauwen at gmail

Oct 6, 2009, 8:03 AM

Post #8 of 15 (1043 views)
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta? [In reply to]

~Jorge
[X] +1 to release as 0.9.6-beta

Works ok here on linux (gentoo)

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 5:28 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<wrowe [at] rowe-clan>wrote:

> Following Rainer's Solaris discoveries and our DISTDIR suggestions,
>
> Please fetch up the newly prepared mod_ftp-0.9.6.tar.gz (or .bz2), or the
> win32/netware/os2 suitable package mod_ftp-0.9.6-crlf.zip from;
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_ftp/
>
> review, take it for a spin, and cast your choice
>
> [ ] -1 for any release of 0.9.6 (regressed from 0.9.2 or earlier?)
> [X] +1 to release as 0.9.6-beta
> [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6 GA
>
> For getting started,
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/mod_ftp/
>
> and
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_ftp/tags/0.9.6/README-FTP
>
> Bill
>
>

jblond at gmail

Oct 6, 2009, 8:45 AM

Post #9 of 15 (1051 views)
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta? [In reply to]

[X] +1 to release as 0.9.6-beta

Works on Win XP SP3 and Windows 2003 ST SP2

Mario

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Jorge Schrauwen
<jorge.schrauwen [at] gmail> wrote:
>
> ~Jorge
> [X] +1 to release as 0.9.6-beta
>
> Works ok here on linux (gentoo)
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 5:28 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <wrowe [at] rowe-clan>
> wrote:
>>
>> Following Rainer's Solaris discoveries and our DISTDIR suggestions,
>>
>> Please fetch up the newly prepared mod_ftp-0.9.6.tar.gz (or .bz2), or the
>> win32/netware/os2 suitable package mod_ftp-0.9.6-crlf.zip from;
>>
>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_ftp/
>>
>> review, take it for a spin, and cast your choice
>>
>> [ ] -1 for any release of 0.9.6 (regressed from 0.9.2 or earlier?)
>> [X] +1 to release as 0.9.6-beta
>> [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6 GA
>>
>> For getting started,
>>
>> http://httpd.apache.org/mod_ftp/
>>
>> and
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_ftp/tags/0.9.6/README-FTP
>>
>> Bill
>>
>
>

rainer.jung at kippdata

Oct 6, 2009, 9:31 AM

Post #10 of 15 (1040 views)
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta? [In reply to]

On 29.09.2009 05:28, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> [ ] -1 for any release of 0.9.6 (regressed from 0.9.2 or earlier?)
> [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6-beta
> [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6 GA

Exactly like Jeff:

+1 for beta
+ 0.5 for GA (I don't know enough about it to be more sure)

This time I tested on Windows (XP with VS .NET 2003 against httpd 2.2.14
out of tree).

Note concerning the Windows build files: I did a "neu erstellen", should
be something like clean&build. As a result for mod_ftp I did not get
.pdb files. They were only produced for mod_ftp_example.

Digging into it a little deeper reveals, that if you do "neu erstellen",
then it first produces all files for mod_ftp (including pdb), then
removes most of them as part of the clean for mod_ftp_example and then
produces the files for mod_ftp_example.

Regards,

Rainer

wrowe at rowe-clan

Oct 6, 2009, 9:47 AM

Post #11 of 15 (1050 views)
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta? [In reply to]

Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> Note concerning the Windows build files: I did a "neu erstellen", should
> be something like clean&build. As a result for mod_ftp I did not get
> .pdb files. They were only produced for mod_ftp_example.
>
> Digging into it a little deeper reveals, that if you do "neu erstellen",
> then it first produces all files for mod_ftp (including pdb), then
> removes most of them as part of the clean for mod_ftp_example and then
> produces the files for mod_ftp_example.

As I inquired before, do you encounter this problem cleaning, building and
installing using Makefile-ftp.win? Choosing ALL=1 to the makefile should
trigger this. The problem is again, command line vars are not passing from
the first nmake invocation into its sub-nmake's, something I need to investigate.

rainer.jung at kippdata

Oct 6, 2009, 10:47 AM

Post #12 of 15 (1039 views)
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta? [In reply to]

On 06.10.2009 18:47, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Rainer Jung wrote:
>>
>> Note concerning the Windows build files: I did a "neu erstellen", should
>> be something like clean&build. As a result for mod_ftp I did not get
>> .pdb files. They were only produced for mod_ftp_example.
>>
>> Digging into it a little deeper reveals, that if you do "neu erstellen",
>> then it first produces all files for mod_ftp (including pdb), then
>> removes most of them as part of the clean for mod_ftp_example and then
>> produces the files for mod_ftp_example.
>
> As I inquired before, do you encounter this problem cleaning, building and
> installing using Makefile-ftp.win? Choosing ALL=1 to the makefile should
> trigger this. The problem is again, command line vars are not passing from
> the first nmake invocation into its sub-nmake's, something I need to investigate.

No, I used the .dsw and Visual Studio. See my separate post about
mod_fcgid where I reported problems and fix for the Makefile-*.win a few
minutes ago.

I found the ALL switch during that test in the fcgid makefile (sic). For
me it looks like parsing the vars does work, it was only broken fr
INSTDIR, because it was accidentially and unconditionaly overwritten at
the beginning of the Makefile. See patch link in my other post.

Regards,

Rainer

wrowe at rowe-clan

Oct 8, 2009, 12:51 AM

Post #13 of 15 (1031 views)
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta? [In reply to]

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> I'll leave the vote open three more days
> before ending evaluation of this package

There are sufficient votes to release, so in about 14 hours it will be announced
unless the tide turns between now and then.

wrowe at rowe-clan

Oct 9, 2009, 12:05 PM

Post #14 of 15 (1027 views)
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta? [In reply to]

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> Please fetch up the newly prepared mod_ftp-0.9.6.tar.gz (or .bz2), or the
> win32/netware/os2 suitable package mod_ftp-0.9.6-crlf.zip from;
>
> [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6-beta
> [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6 GA

+1 for GA; wrowe
+.5 for GA; trawick, rjung
binding +1 for beta; wrowe, trawick, rpluem, fuankg, rjung

Additional positive feedback from Jorge and Mario (linux, win32)

It would be good in the next cycle, with all of the small improvements that Jeff and I
had worked on, to bless this as GA. Unfortunately .5 votes don't sum to 1 :)

Thanks everyone for reviewing!

trawick at gmail

Oct 9, 2009, 12:20 PM

Post #15 of 15 (1026 views)
Permalink

Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.6 beta? [In reply to]

On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:05 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<wrowe [at] rowe-clan> wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>
>> Please fetch up the newly prepared mod_ftp-0.9.6.tar.gz (or .bz2), or the
>> win32/netware/os2 suitable package mod_ftp-0.9.6-crlf.zip from;
>>
>> [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6-beta
>> [ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6 GA
>
> +1 for GA; wrowe
> +.5 for GA; trawick, rjung
> binding +1 for beta; wrowe, trawick, rpluem, fuankg, rjung
>
> Additional positive feedback from Jorge and Mario (linux, win32)
>
> It would be good in the next cycle, with all of the small improvements that Jeff and I
> had worked on, to bless this as GA. Unfortunately .5 votes don't sum to 1 :)

It is a beta now but could still be GA if nobody finds a regression
and something magic happens and we get votes for GA, right?

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads