wrowe at rowe-clan
Mar 5, 2007, 2:48 PM
Post #5 of 7
(579 views)
Permalink
|
Joe Orton wrote:
>
> Can you get rid of the branches of apr/apr-util? They have no place in
> the httpd SVN tree.
As 'solving' a build of apache httpd to follow the fips security policy
of openssl requires a similarly fips-ified apr/apr-util, I'll leave those
in place. When you've svn'ed all the other code that "doesn't belong" in
httpd, including each copy of pcre and expat that "doesn't belong", then
we'll talk about fixing "your issue" with this sandbox.
Sandbox goes as far as demonstrating a proof of concept and means nothing
until the list[s] adopt the proposed patch[es]. At that point you aren't
far offbase; we must present the proposed apr changes to the dev[at]apr list
ask ask if they would adopt those, httpd can't make decisions for apr any
more than we can make decisions for expat or pcre communities. If we have
to provide local patches instead to apr, then we'll discuss that, but give
dev[at]apr first crack at discussing this.
Bill
|
smime.p7s
