<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Apache | Dev</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>16 May  2008 17:27:33 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Debian gaffe (DSA-1571-1, CVE-2008-016)</title>
<description>The debian gaffe also affects any &amp;#039;req&amp;#039;s or self-signed certs created  on the affected platform. Unfortunately the blacklists generated by folks are</description>
<pubDate>16 May  2008 13:11:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351684</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Response to TRACE garbled from EBCDIC platform</title>
<description>The response to TRACE when &amp;quot;TraceEnable Off&amp;quot; is not used on an EBCDIC platform is partially in ASCII and partially in EBCDIC (part readable, part garb</description>
<pubDate>15 May  2008 10:54:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351653</link>
</item><item>
<title>bugs/inappropriate coding practice discovered by interprocedural code analysis for version 2.2.8 of Apache</title>
<description>Dear Apache-HTTPD developers,  I am a Ph.D student in the Software Engineering Research Group of EECS department in Case Western Reserve University,</description>
<pubDate>14 May  2008 11:44:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351609</link>
</item><item>
<title>Correction to BID 29112 &amp;quot;Apache Server HTML Injection and UTF-7 XSS Vulnerability&amp;quot;</title>
<description>HTTP User and Desktop Security Communities; With respect to http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/29112 Per http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt 3.7.1 Ca</description>
<pubDate>14 May  2008 10:27:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351607</link>
</item><item>
<title>CVE-2008-2168</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability when displaying the 403 Forbidden error page I can&amp;#039;t find any info about this issue on the site. I guess</description>
<pubDate>14 May  2008 04:35:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351590</link>
</item><item>
<title>Impact of OpenSSL Randomness issues on Debian</title>
<description>If you are just catching up: http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2008-0166 http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/05/13/1533212 Most of the tal</description>
<pubDate>13 May  2008 14:18:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351562</link>
</item><item>
<title>Missing vote for persistent SSL backend proxy connections</title>
<description>I know that the following patch really requires some work to review, but it is missing only one vote and it would be really worth to be included in 2.</description>
<pubDate>13 May  2008 14:02:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351561</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r655711 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES support/suexec.c</title>
<description>On 05/13/2008 04:21 AM, fielding@apache.org wrote: &amp;gt; Author: fielding &amp;gt; Date: Mon May 12 19:21:33 2008 &amp;gt; New Revision: 655711 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; URL: http://svn.apa</description>
<pubDate>13 May  2008 12:30:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351560</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r655594 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS</title>
<description>On 05/12/2008 08:39 PM, jim@apache.org wrote: &amp;gt; Author: jim &amp;gt; Date: Mon May 12 11:39:34 2008 &amp;gt; New Revision: 655594 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; URL: http://svn.apache.org/vi</description>
<pubDate>12 May  2008 13:33:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351478</link>
</item><item>
<title>mod_proxy race condition bug #37770</title>
<description>Hi, I was wondering if anyone might have some more information on bug #37770. I&amp;#039;ve added a comment there recently, at the end of the bug report, #83</description>
<pubDate>12 May  2008 10:52:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351463</link>
</item><item>
<title>Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2008/05/11]</title>
<description>+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bugzilla Bug ID</description>
<pubDate>11 May  2008 23:08:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351420</link>
</item><item>
<title>Bug report for Apache httpd-1.3 [2008/05/11]</title>
<description>+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bugzilla Bug ID</description>
<pubDate>11 May  2008 23:08:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351419</link>
</item><item>
<title>AllowOverride Options vs AllowOverride Options= reloaded</title>
<description>Hello to all, in https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44262 I was told to ask about this issue on dev@httpd.apache.org. Long talk shor</description>
<pubDate>11 May  2008 13:49:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351408</link>
</item><item>
<title>Do the worker and prefork MPMs forcefully kill child processes?</title>
<description>Hi, this is a question about Apache module development. I&amp;#039;m not sure whether I&amp;#039;m writing to the right mailing list, but this topic doesn&amp;#039;t seem belo</description>
<pubDate>11 May  2008 10:21:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351405</link>
</item><item>
<title>Bug 44817 - httpd fails to build with libtool-2.2.*</title>
<description>Apache developers, I would like to politely ask you to fix Bug 44817: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44817 The patch had been alre</description>
<pubDate>11 May  2008 07:14:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351401</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r654958 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES modules/aaa/mod_auth_form.c</title>
<description>On 05/10/2008 12:15 AM, minfrin@apache.org wrote: &amp;gt; Author: minfrin &amp;gt; Date: Fri May 9 15:15:37 2008 &amp;gt; New Revision: 654958 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; URL: http://svn.apach</description>
<pubDate>09 May  2008 23:13:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351383</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r654968 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES modules/proxy/mod_proxy_http.c server/protocol.c</title>
<description>On May 9, 2008, at 3:40 PM, minfrin@apache.org wrote: &amp;gt; Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_http.c &amp;gt; URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewv</description>
<pubDate>09 May  2008 15:58:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351367</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r654805 [1/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual: ./ developer/ faq/ howto/ misc/ mod/ platform/ programs/ rewrite/ ssl/ vhosts/</title>
<description>* jim@apache.org wrote: &amp;gt; Author: jim &amp;gt; Date: Fri May 9 06:35:27 2008 &amp;gt; New Revision: 654805 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=654805&amp;amp;view=r</description>
<pubDate>09 May  2008 14:06:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351354</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r654797 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x: CHANGES STATUS docs/manual/mod/mod_headers.xml modules/metadata/mod_headers.c</title>
<description>Jim Jagielski wrote: &amp;gt; Add in r568323 and 568879. The approved patch &amp;gt; lacked updates to the doccos and so really shouldn&amp;#039;t &amp;gt; have been approved as i</description>
<pubDate>09 May  2008 10:18:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351344</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r654752 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x: CHANGES STATUS modules/generators/mod_cgid.c</title>
<description>On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 6:57 AM, &amp;lt;trawick@apache.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Author: trawick &amp;gt; Date: Fri May 9 03:57:46 2008 &amp;gt; New Revision: 654752 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; URL: http:/</description>
<pubDate>09 May  2008 05:27:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351312</link>
</item><item>
<title>Looking for reviewers for the second edition of the Apache Pocket Reference</title>
<description>I am nearly finished with the technical review draft of the second edition of the Apache Pocket Reference (my deadline for this is 30 May), and am loo</description>
<pubDate>09 May  2008 04:43:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351310</link>
</item><item>
<title>abort inside ap_internal_fast_redirect()</title>
<description>Hi all, While debugging something else entirely I have tripped over an abort() triggered from inside mod_dir when POOL_DEBUG is enabled. It seems w</description>
<pubDate>08 May  2008 06:29:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351265</link>
</item><item>
<title>mod_mbox compile issue on SuSE Enterprise 10</title>
<description>Hello, I&amp;#039;m currently looking to deploy mod_mbox on a SuSE 10 server, and I&amp;#039;m having some issues getting the package to compile. I&amp;#039;m hoping that so</description>
<pubDate>07 May  2008 16:50:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351239</link>
</item><item>
<title>Careful meets checking of PR#40169</title>
<description>Any reason why we never applied     https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40169 It looks sensible to me - and would, as a side effe</description>
<pubDate>07 May  2008 13:53:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351226</link>
</item><item>
<title>jumbo patch from 39380 - and moving things &amp;#039;up&amp;#039; to mod_cache itself</title>
<description>Niklas, There is a lot of valuable stuff in your jumbo patch - but I am not  sure what the best approach is to fold it in. Could you have have a lo</description>
<pubDate>07 May  2008 13:47:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351225</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
