<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Apache | Dev</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>04 Jul  2009 14:14:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r786825 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS</title>
<description>On 06/20/2009 03:54 PM, rpluem@apache.org wrote: &amp;gt; Author: rpluem &amp;gt; Date: Sat Jun 20 13:54:23 2009 &amp;gt; New Revision: 786825 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; URL: http://svn.apache.</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2009 00:57:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370114</link>
</item><item>
<title>Information about &amp;quot;svn commit: r570307 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x:CHANGES STATUS server/log.c&amp;quot;</title>
<description>Hi William Rowe,  After upgrading Apache from version 2.059 to 2.0.63, in Netware the Apache process doesn&amp;#039;t stop immediately but waits for some act</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2009 05:00:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370100</link>
</item><item>
<title>some updates to snapshot site?</title>
<description>All, I just wanted to point someone to a recent snapshot of 2.2 branch, but found that there is none; we only have 2.0 branch and HEAD ... I think it</description>
<pubDate>02 Jul  2009 16:14:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370080</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r790205 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/experimental/mod_noloris.c</title>
<description>tOn 01.07.2009 17:01, niq@apache.org wrote: &amp;gt; Author: niq &amp;gt; Date: Wed Jul 1 15:01:55 2009 &amp;gt; New Revision: 790205 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; URL: http://svn.apache.org/view</description>
<pubDate>01 Jul  2009 12:31:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370038</link>
</item><item>
<title>protocol for reporting bug that &amp;#039;may&amp;#039; be considered exploit</title>
<description>Hello, I think we may have discovered an issue with mod_proxy that &amp;#039;could&amp;#039; be used as an exploit to render an Apache server useless. I normally repo</description>
<pubDate>29 Jun  2009 21:10:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369936</link>
</item><item>
<title>Creating a new thread inside a module</title>
<description>Hi All, I want to open a port to communicate my Apache hhtpd (2.2) with small software run on a separate machine .Without affecting the httpd how can</description>
<pubDate>29 Jun  2009 09:01:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369911</link>
</item><item>
<title>httpd initd daemon</title>
<description>i would like to set the httpd instance to run as standard linux daemon. the daemon should be controlled by the init daemon. the problem is that the ap</description>
<pubDate>29 Jun  2009 02:38:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369898</link>
</item><item>
<title>Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2009/06/28]</title>
<description>+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bugzilla Bug ID</description>
<pubDate>28 Jun  2009 23:08:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369894</link>
</item><item>
<title>Bug report for Apache httpd-1.3 [2009/06/28]</title>
<description>+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bugzilla Bug ID</description>
<pubDate>28 Jun  2009 23:08:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369893</link>
</item><item>
<title>mod_deflate DoS</title>
<description>Hi, we have received a bug report [1] that a DoS is possible with mod_deflate since it does not stop to compress large files even after the network</description>
<pubDate>28 Jun  2009 11:20:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369889</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Fix typo in ap_mmn.h</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m attaching the patch which fixes a typo in ap_mmn.h. -- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis</description>
<pubDate>27 Jun  2009 08:28:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369877</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47392] &amp;lt;FilesMatch&amp;gt; is using the wrong directory</title>
<description>This is a discussion not a bugfix (yet) :) bugzilla@apache.org wrote: &amp;gt; https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47392 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; --- Comment #4</description>
<pubDate>26 Jun  2009 10:54:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369845</link>
</item><item>
<title>mod_ssl / ssl_engine_ocsp.c customizations</title>
<description>Dear list, as I am new to this list, I don&amp;#039;t know but hope questions regarding mod_ssl are welcome? I am currently working on - dirty, please have m</description>
<pubDate>26 Jun  2009 06:55:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369836</link>
</item><item>
<title>mod_noloris: mitigating against slowloris-style attack</title>
<description>I was just thinking about a quick&amp;amp;dirty fix we could offer to admins who are suddenly concerned about DoS attack. The following, backed by dbm or mem</description>
<pubDate>25 Jun  2009 06:39:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369785</link>
</item><item>
<title>A modest proposal, was Re: Mitigating the Slowloris DoS attack</title>
<description>On 6/23/09 12:48 AM, &amp;quot;Paul Querna&amp;quot; &amp;lt;paul@querna.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Mitagation is the wrong approach. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; We all know our architecture is wrong. Another</description>
<pubDate>23 Jun  2009 17:39:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369729</link>
</item><item>
<title>PR 38330: Make RemoveType override TypesConfig mime.types?</title>
<description>On Saturday 20 December 2008, Stefan Fritsch wrote: &amp;gt; for people who use a system wide mime.types as TypesConfig, it &amp;gt; would be nice if there was a wa</description>
<pubDate>23 Jun  2009 13:25:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369725</link>
</item><item>
<title>testing for connections with keep-alive property from modules</title>
<description>Hi, What&amp;#039;s the recommended way to check for a connection having the property of being kept alive? I was expecting to see tests like c-&amp;gt;keepalive ==</description>
<pubDate>23 Jun  2009 06:51:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369707</link>
</item><item>
<title>Using slotmem in /mod_lbmethod_heartbeat/mod_heartmonitor</title>
<description>Hi, I plan to use slotmem (additionally to the actual file based logic) in the heartbeat logic. HeartbeatStorage mem:logs/hb.dat (slotmem and key/sa</description>
<pubDate>23 Jun  2009 05:35:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369691</link>
</item><item>
<title>build mod_proxy by source</title>
<description>Hi All, I need to build mod_proxy by source rather than enable in the configuration. I dont know how to build it by apxs as it has two dependent fil</description>
<pubDate>22 Jun  2009 12:00:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369655</link>
</item><item>
<title>Apache requires read permissions for parent directories of configuration files</title>
<description>Hi, I encountered the following problem with Apache HTTPD on Windows: * lets suppose that server root is &amp;quot;C:\ABC\XYZ\root&amp;quot;; * httpd service have all</description>
<pubDate>22 Jun  2009 07:48:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369635</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Fwd: Slowloris]</title>
<description>(moved to dev@ - as this issue is now perfectly public). Ben Laurie wrote: &amp;gt; Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Ben Laurie wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; What does that mat</description>
<pubDate>22 Jun  2009 05:23:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369630</link>
</item><item>
<title>Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2009/06/21]</title>
<description>+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bugzilla Bug ID</description>
<pubDate>21 Jun  2009 23:08:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369618</link>
</item><item>
<title>Bug report for Apache httpd-1.3 [2009/06/21]</title>
<description>+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bugzilla Bug ID</description>
<pubDate>21 Jun  2009 23:08:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369617</link>
</item><item>
<title>Mitigating the Slowloris DoS attack</title>
<description>Hello everyone, Previously, I had contacted the Apache Security Team about a possible mitigation of the Slowloris DoS attack. I was referred to this</description>
<pubDate>21 Jun  2009 04:10:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369595</link>
</item><item>
<title>slowloris</title>
<description>Just noticed attached posting on debian security. This very much mimics our initial approach at JRC in the mid 90&amp;#039;s when we got hit by pretty much t</description>
<pubDate>20 Jun  2009 10:51:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369586</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
