<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Apache | Dev</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>12 Feb  2012 14:22:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: [RFC] speedup some tests in httpd</title>
<description>On 12 Feb 2012, at 9:59 AM, Christophe JAILLET wrote: &amp;gt; I also made some measurement. &amp;gt; The version with the test against *l is faster ONLY when the</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 13:50:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408787</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Intent to T&amp;amp;R 2.4.1</title>
<description>On 02/12/2012 04:57 PM, Mario Brandt wrote: &amp;gt; Bug 52402[1] isn&amp;#039;t working yet. I wonder why it is marked as fixed in &amp;gt; 2.4.x CHANGES[2] The shared memo</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 11:30:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408785</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1243272 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod: core.xml.fr mod_proxy.xml.fr mod_rewrite.xml.fr</title>
<description>Hi Lucien, On 12.02.2012 17:08, lgentis@apache.org wrote: &amp;gt; Author: lgentis &amp;gt; Date: Sun Feb 12 16:08:31 2012 &amp;gt; New Revision: 1243272 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; URL: http://</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 10:14:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408784</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Intent to T&amp;amp;R 2.4.1</title>
<description>Bug 52402[1] isn&amp;#039;t working yet. I wonder why it is marked as fixed in 2.4.x CHANGES[2] The shared memory stuff doesn&amp;#039;t work yet on windows. Odd Behav</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 07:57:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408782</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Intent to T&amp;amp;R 2.4.1</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve been asked to hold off until tomorrow (Monday) morning... On Feb 9, 2012, at 9:03 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: &amp;gt; A heads up that I plan to T&amp;amp;R 2.4.</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 07:34:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408781</link>
</item><item>
<title>Some spare time for fixing our front page?</title>
<description>I just notived the following sentence on our front page: Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996, and cel</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 07:10:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408780</link>
</item><item>
<title>[RFC] speedup some tests in httpd</title>
<description>Hi, In many places of httpd, we are skipping white spaces with code that looks like :   while (*l &amp;amp;&amp;amp; apr_isspace(*l)) {     ++l;   } The fi</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 23:59:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408767</link>
</item><item>
<title>Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2012/02/12]</title>
<description>+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bugzilla Bug ID</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 23:15:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408766</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] AIX configure options</title>
<description>On 11 Feb 2012, at 1:56 PM, Michael Felt wrote: &amp;gt; After finishing the httpd2.2.22 working on the httpd2.4.X &amp;gt; First issue, no pcre so did a &amp;quot;build/ai</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 04:19:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408742</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] AIX configure options</title>
<description>After finishing the httpd2.2.22 working on the httpd2.4.X First issue, no pcre so did a &amp;quot;build/aix&amp;quot; of pcre and restarted. APR/APU is from apr project</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 03:56:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408741</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1242950 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/style/build.properties</title>
<description>* Rainer Jung wrote: &amp;gt; Should be move ab, apxs and logrotate back to section 8? I think they &amp;gt; have been there until version 2.2.21 and moving them t</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 14:22:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408731</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1242950 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/style/build.properties</title>
<description>Hi Andre, nice fix. One remark see below. On 10.02.2012 22:53, nd@apache.org wrote: &amp;gt; Author: nd &amp;gt; Date: Fri Feb 10 21:53:19 2012 &amp;gt; New Revision: 12</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 14:11:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408725</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1221296 - /httpd/docs-build/trunk/build.xml</title>
<description>* Graham Leggett wrote: &amp;gt; On 10 Feb 2012, at 9:55 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Since the build system is shared between at least 2.2, 2.4 and trunk, &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 11:59:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408705</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Question on release process - making release public by svn move</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Can I ask for a bit more detail on how you actually do the move? &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I want to ensure that we preserve the history to show that the &amp;gt; release/ files</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 05:21:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408696</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1221296 - /httpd/docs-build/trunk/build.xml</title>
<description>On 10 Feb 2012, at 9:55 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: &amp;gt; Since the build system is shared between at least 2.2, 2.4 and trunk, this change also moved the man</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 01:41:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408690</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1221296 - /httpd/docs-build/trunk/build.xml</title>
<description>Hi Graham, On 20.12.2011 15:53, minfrin@apache.org wrote: &amp;gt; Author: minfrin &amp;gt; Date: Tue Dec 20 14:53:13 2011 &amp;gt; New Revision: 1221296 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; URL: http://</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 23:55:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408689</link>
</item><item>
<title>Question on release process - making release public by svn move</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m looking into updating the JMeter release instructions to use the https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/ repo. AIUI you use dev/httpd/ for vote stagin</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 17:25:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408684</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1242351 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h modules/proxy/mod_proxy_fcgi.c server/util_script.c</title>
<description>On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:22 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_fcgi.c &amp;gt;&amp;gt; URL: http://svn.apache.org/view</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 08:51:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408670</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1242351 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h modules/proxy/mod_proxy_fcgi.c server/util_script.c</title>
<description>On Feb 9, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: &amp;gt; jim@apache.org wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Author: jim &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Date: Thu Feb 9 15:07:22 2012 &amp;gt;&amp;gt; New Revision: 1242351</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 08:39:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408669</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1242351 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h modules/proxy/mod_proxy_fcgi.c server/util_script.c</title>
<description>jim@apache.org wrote: &amp;gt; Author: jim &amp;gt; Date: Thu Feb 9 15:07:22 2012 &amp;gt; New Revision: 1242351 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1242351&amp;amp;view=r</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 08:22:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408668</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Intent to T&amp;amp;R 2.4.1</title>
<description>:) On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Graham Leggett &amp;lt;minfrin@sharp.fm&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On 09 Feb 2012, at 4:03 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; A heads up that</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 07:34:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408667</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Intent to T&amp;amp;R 2.4.1</title>
<description>On 09 Feb 2012, at 4:03 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: &amp;gt; A heads up that I plan to T&amp;amp;R 2.4.1 within the next 48hrs... &amp;gt; Why 48hrs? To give people who might</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 06:47:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408666</link>
</item><item>
<title>Intent to T&amp;amp;R 2.4.1</title>
<description>A heads up that I plan to T&amp;amp;R 2.4.1 within the next 48hrs... Why 48hrs? To give people who might either have patches/backports time to fold them in, a</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 06:03:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408657</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Issues encountered http 2.2.22 and separate apr/apu -- cannot configure!</title>
<description>On 09 Feb 2012, at 12:38 PM, Michael Felt wrote: &amp;gt; Bit confused. &amp;gt; 1) reinstalled by build system from scratch &amp;gt; 2) installed apr/apu in /opt/bin &amp;gt; 3</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 03:00:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408656</link>
</item><item>
<title>Issues encountered http 2.2.22 and separate apr/apu -- cannot configure!</title>
<description>Hi, Bit confused. 1) reinstalled by build system from scratch 2) installed apr/apu in /opt/bin 3) build/aix/buildaix.ksh -- configure fails with foll</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 02:38:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408655</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

