Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 26 Nov 2009 07:12:15 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Edgar Frank <ef-lists@email.de> wrote: >> I'd much rather see effort put into mod_proxy_fcgi to support this use >> c 26 Nov 2009 02:49:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377570 On Tue, Nov 24, 2009, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 , Edgar Frank <ef-lists@email.de> wrote: > > (1) > > mod_fcgid sh 26 Nov 2009 00:26:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377565 We are studying behavior and characteristic about Open Source Software (OSS) development using by reference “What can OSS mailing lists tell us? A p 25 Nov 2009 17:13:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377557 On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Paul Querna <paul@querna.org> wrote: > Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.4-alpha are available at: >   <http://http 25 Nov 2009 16:09:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377552 Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.4-alpha are available at: <http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/> Your votes please; +/- 1 [ ] Release httpd-2 25 Nov 2009 14:43:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377551 On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Niklas Edmundsson <nikke@acc.umu.se> wrote: > On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Jeff Trawick wrote: > >> As with mutex implementa 25 Nov 2009 08:10:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377498 On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Jeff Trawick wrote: > As with mutex implementations, APR pollset implementations, or the > underlying OS support, are occasional 25 Nov 2009 07:42:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377497 > -----Original Message----- > From: Hartmut Keil > Sent: Mittwoch, 25. November 2009 13:51 > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: back port off patch 25 Nov 2009 04:58:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377487 Hi are there plans for backporting the patch http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/patches/apply_to_2.2.14/CVE-2009-3555-2.2.patch for 2.0.63 ? Is a backp 25 Nov 2009 04:51:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377486 On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Edgar Frank <ef-lists@email.de> wrote: > 2009/11/25 Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek@gmail.com> >> > Yes, you're right. 25 Nov 2009 03:57:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377480 2009/11/25 Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek@gmail.com> > > Yes, you're right. In a FCGI_GET_VALUES request, the backend can send > > arbitrary name-value 25 Nov 2009 03:54:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377479 On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com> 25 Nov 2009 03:34:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377478 On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Edgar Frank <ef-lists@email.de> wrote: >> Wouldn't it be better to have the backend tell the frontend that it >> sup 25 Nov 2009 03:22:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377477 2009/11/26 Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek@gmail.com> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Edgar Frank <ef-lists@email.de> wrote: > > Maybe, in implement 25 Nov 2009 03:17:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377476 On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Edgar Frank <ef-lists@email.de> wrote: > Maybe, in implementing this in mod_fcgid and making it configurable, Apache 25 Nov 2009 02:41:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377475 2009/11/25 Graham Dumpleton <graham.dumpleton@gmail.com> > 2009/11/25 Edgar Frank <ef-lists@email.de>: > > While delving into the FCGI and CGI spec, I 25 Nov 2009 02:37:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377474 2009/11/25 Edgar Frank <ef-lists@email.de>: >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 05:07 PM, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Or otherwise, can some 25 Nov 2009 02:03:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377466 > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 05:07 PM, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Or otherwise, can someone explain the details to me why it is as it 25 Nov 2009 01:50:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377465 On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:58 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. > <wrowe@rowe-clan.net 24 Nov 2009 13:45:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377444 On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Gregg L. Smith <lists@glewis.com> wrote: > Jeff Trawick wrote: >> >> (mpm_default.h won't be found on Unix without bu 24 Nov 2009 12:37:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377443 Nick Kew wrote: > > Regarding r883540 itself, I've just taken a look at it. > It seems to enforce the same mutex type on all modules that > use a mut 24 Nov 2009 12:20:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377442 Jeff Trawick wrote: > > Many if not all other functions which handle directives and which are > not implemented in the same file as the directive dec 24 Nov 2009 12:18:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377429 William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > trawick@apache.org wrote: >> --- httpd/httpd/trunk/include/util_mutex.h (original) >> +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/include/util_ 24 Nov 2009 12:17:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377428 Jeff Trawick wrote: > no, even I could understand > > I fixed it by hardcoding "logs" when DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR isn't defined. This works for me a 24 Nov 2009 12:12:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377427 On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:50 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > trawick@apache.org wrote: >> --- httpd/httpd/trunk/include/util_mu 24 Nov 2009 12:11:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377426