Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 04 Jul 2009 14:24:33 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Hi All, I am still unable to create a new thread inside the balancer_init function. Here the way that I tried. But in this way new thread was create 04 Jul 2009 12:13:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370117 On 06/20/2009 03:54 PM, rpluem@apache.org wrote: > Author: rpluem > Date: Sat Jun 20 13:54:23 2009 > New Revision: 786825 > > URL: http://svn.apache. 04 Jul 2009 00:57:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370114 Hi William Rowe, After upgrading Apache from version 2.059 to 2.0.63, in Netware the Apache process doesn't stop immediately but waits for some act 03 Jul 2009 05:00:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370100 On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 08:20:20PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > we have received a bug report [1] that a DoS is possible with > mod_deflate since i 03 Jul 2009 03:00:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370095 All, I just wanted to point someone to a recent snapshot of 2.2 branch, but found that there is none; we only have 2.0 branch and HEAD ... I think it 02 Jul 2009 16:14:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370080 Joe Orton wrote: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 01:37:22PM +0100, Nick Kew wrote: >> Joe Orton wrote: >> >>> 1) A *linear-time* search on a shm segment, us 02 Jul 2009 09:01:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370070 On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 01:37:22PM +0100, Nick Kew wrote: > Joe Orton wrote: > >> 1) A *linear-time* search on a shm segment, using strstr. > > 2) ... 02 Jul 2009 07:41:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370069 On 7/2/09 8:37 AM, "Nick Kew" <nick@webthing.com> wrote: > Not everyone who's concerned right now about slowloris has > iptables at their disposal. 02 Jul 2009 07:00:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370068 Joe Orton wrote: > 1) A *linear-time* search on a shm segment, using strstr. > 2) ... for each new connection. With the expectation that the shm se 02 Jul 2009 05:37:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370063 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 03:55:27PM +0200, Natanael Mignon - michael-wessel.de wrote: > I am currently working on - dirty, please have mercy - customiz 02 Jul 2009 04:48:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370062 On Jul 2, 2009, at 5:58 AM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 03:01:55PM -0000, niq@apache.org wrote: >> Author: niq >> Date: Wed Jul 1 15: 02 Jul 2009 04:32:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370061 On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 03:01:55PM -0000, niq@apache.org wrote: > Author: niq > Date: Wed Jul 1 15:01:55 2009 > New Revision: 790205 > > URL: http:/ 02 Jul 2009 02:58:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370059 Hi, please can anybody roughly tell me how to register a new thread under the main child thread pool .It is great help for me. Shaniro Herath. 01 Jul 2009 16:11:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370045 Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> + * The major difference is that mod_antiloris checks the scoreboard >> + * on every request. This implies a per-request ov 01 Jul 2009 13:58:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370041 Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > I am not sure if doing this for each connection (not each *request*) > is really that much of a performace hit. I used a mo 01 Jul 2009 12:59:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370040 On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:01 AM, <niq@apache.org> wrote: > Author: niq > Date: Wed Jul  1 15:01:55 2009 > New Revision: 790205 > > URL: http://svn.apa 01 Jul 2009 12:33:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370039 tOn 01.07.2009 17:01, niq@apache.org wrote: > Author: niq > Date: Wed Jul 1 15:01:55 2009 > New Revision: 790205 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/view 01 Jul 2009 12:31:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370038 h iroshan wrote: > > Hi William and Mladen, > > Thanks both of you but i am still struggling with my thread creation. I > create my background thre 01 Jul 2009 09:14:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370022 On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Nick Kew<nick@webthing.com> wrote: > Gonzalo Arana wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Keeping whitelist up to date is rather trick 01 Jul 2009 06:32:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370008 To avoid a ban on 89.0.0.13 also banning 9.0.0.1, we might want to include the separators in the strstr, as in the attached patch. 01 Jul 2009 06:30:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370007 On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Nick Kew<nick@webthing.com> wrote: > Gonzalo Arana wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Keeping whitelist up to date is rather trick 01 Jul 2009 06:12:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370000 Gonzalo Arana wrote: > Hi, > > Keeping whitelist up to date is rather tricky. > > How about having any/all of these directives? > > # time between 01 Jul 2009 05:49:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369999 Nick Kew wrote: > I've actually hacked up mod_noloris to do exactly that. Was planning to > test-drive then post, but since you bring the matter up, 01 Jul 2009 05:45:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369998 Hi, Keeping whitelist up to date is rather tricky. How about having any/all of these directives? # time between accept(2) call and the full request 01 Jul 2009 05:33:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369997 Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com > <mailto:nick@webthing.com>> wrote: > > fredk2 wrote: > > 01 Jul 2009 05:04:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369996