<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Apache | Dev</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>12 Feb  2012 18:12:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1243272 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod: core.xml.fr mod_proxy.xml.fr mod_rewrite.xml.fr</title>
<description>Hi Lucien, On 12.02.2012 17:08, lgentis@apache.org wrote: &amp;gt; Author: lgentis &amp;gt; Date: Sun Feb 12 16:08:31 2012 &amp;gt; New Revision: 1243272 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; URL: http://</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 10:14:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408784</link>
</item><item>
<title>Some spare time for fixing our front page?</title>
<description>I just notived the following sentence on our front page: Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996, and cel</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 07:10:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408780</link>
</item><item>
<title>[RFC] speedup some tests in httpd</title>
<description>Hi, In many places of httpd, we are skipping white spaces with code that looks like :   while (*l &amp;amp;&amp;amp; apr_isspace(*l)) {     ++l;   } The fi</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 23:59:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408767</link>
</item><item>
<title>Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2012/02/12]</title>
<description>+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bugzilla Bug ID</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 23:15:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408766</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1242950 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/style/build.properties</title>
<description>Hi Andre, nice fix. One remark see below. On 10.02.2012 22:53, nd@apache.org wrote: &amp;gt; Author: nd &amp;gt; Date: Fri Feb 10 21:53:19 2012 &amp;gt; New Revision: 12</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 14:11:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408725</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1221296 - /httpd/docs-build/trunk/build.xml</title>
<description>Hi Graham, On 20.12.2011 15:53, minfrin@apache.org wrote: &amp;gt; Author: minfrin &amp;gt; Date: Tue Dec 20 14:53:13 2011 &amp;gt; New Revision: 1221296 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; URL: http://</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 23:55:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408689</link>
</item><item>
<title>Question on release process - making release public by svn move</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m looking into updating the JMeter release instructions to use the https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/ repo. AIUI you use dev/httpd/ for vote stagin</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 17:25:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408684</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1242351 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h modules/proxy/mod_proxy_fcgi.c server/util_script.c</title>
<description>jim@apache.org wrote: &amp;gt; Author: jim &amp;gt; Date: Thu Feb 9 15:07:22 2012 &amp;gt; New Revision: 1242351 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1242351&amp;amp;view=r</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 08:22:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408668</link>
</item><item>
<title>Intent to T&amp;amp;R 2.4.1</title>
<description>A heads up that I plan to T&amp;amp;R 2.4.1 within the next 48hrs... Why 48hrs? To give people who might either have patches/backports time to fold them in, a</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 06:03:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408657</link>
</item><item>
<title>Issues encountered http 2.2.22 and separate apr/apu -- cannot configure!</title>
<description>Hi, Bit confused. 1) reinstalled by build system from scratch 2) installed apr/apu in /opt/bin 3) build/aix/buildaix.ksh -- configure fails with foll</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 02:38:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408655</link>
</item><item>
<title>Minor errors in Windows x64 build // Apache HTTP Server 2.2.22 Released</title>
<description>Hi, Bill, There seems to be some minor script problems to build a Win-x64 version of httpd 2.2.22. Here is a brief report for your confirmation. Fil</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 07:05:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408634</link>
</item><item>
<title>Fwd: svn commit: r1241897 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/configure.in</title>
<description>Author: jim Date: Wed Feb 8 13:48:19 2012 New Revision: 1241897 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1241897&amp;amp;view=rev Log: Correct the --with_inclu</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 06:51:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408633</link>
</item><item>
<title>[RESULT] Re: [discuss] Bundle apr/apu with 2.4.x</title>
<description>+1: Rüdiger, Gün, jim, Rainer, noel.butler, jblond -1: wrowe, Graham, nick, gstein, stefen, kaspar, mamfelt So it looks like, both binding and bindin</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 05:44:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408623</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] AIX configure options</title>
<description>The buildaix.ksh script committed recently had some outdated options or requirements, and didn&amp;#039;t build loadable MPMs. Suggested changes are below. D</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 11:09:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408608</link>
</item><item>
<title>htdigest -c</title>
<description>Hello I was helping triaging apache2 bugs reports in Debian and found that one: http://bugs.debian.org/564722 &amp;gt; Running &amp;quot;htdigest -c &amp;lt;file&amp;gt; &amp;lt;domain&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>05 Feb  2012 05:52:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408545</link>
</item><item>
<title>Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2012/02/05]</title>
<description>+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bugzilla Bug ID</description>
<pubDate>04 Feb  2012 23:15:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408540</link>
</item><item>
<title>Certificate handling limitations in mod_ssl.</title>
<description>The way mod_ssl currently handles certificates and private keys is rather restrictive and means some of OpenSSL&amp;#039;s current and planned future features</description>
<pubDate>04 Feb  2012 06:27:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408529</link>
</item><item>
<title>mod_proxy_fcgi and EAGAIN (hacking)</title>
<description>Here is what I am testing: I am using (currently one) mod_proxy_fcgi member in a balancer to php-fpm. I have already run into some issues with fcgi://</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 11:32:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408498</link>
</item><item>
<title>mod_slotmem and mod_proxy_balancer/others on win32 (PR52402)</title>
<description>Hi, mod_slotmem cannot work on windows by design. On windows we have two processes so the storage-&amp;gt;grab/slotmem_grab will always fail because the in</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 01:25:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408461</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1239679 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES modules/mappers/mod_rewrite.c</title>
<description>Ouch. Please add a rule flag, that enables this behaviour, if you really need that. mod_rewrite already has enough fancy magic. (and rewriting in d</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 12:59:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408445</link>
</item><item>
<title>[VOTE] Bundle apr/apu with 2.4.x</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m calling a vote to get consensus on whether we should continue to bundle apr/apu with httpd 2.4.x. The proposal is that at the time we T&amp;amp;R 2.4.x,</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 06:54:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408417</link>
</item><item>
<title>OpenSSL configuration and mod_ssl</title>
<description>Guys, It has been apparent for some time that mod_ssl (and other applications) require a considerable effort to support new features in OpenSSL. A s</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 06:13:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408405</link>
</item><item>
<title>AIX packaging</title>
<description>On 02 Feb 2012, at 12:40 AM, Michael Felt wrote: &amp;gt; a tar file with buildaix.ksh (to do the build), aixproto.ksh (to create a very simple AIX template</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 03:54:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408394</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: test message: still not received a message from the list</title>
<description>That is the idea I believe. My first submission (also to dev@ as I still do not see packagers@) a tar file with buildaix.ksh (to do the build), aixp</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 14:40:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408382</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1239336 - /httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/STATUS</title>
<description>Actually, I did find two of them, but when I had replied, I hadn&amp;#039;t gone digging, and wanted to make it easy for someone, anyone to also vote for these</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 13:52:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408379</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1239151 - /httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/STATUS</title>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t have that checked out. Record +1&amp;#039;s from me. On 2/1/2012 8:41 AM, trawick@apache.org wrote: &amp;gt; Author: trawick &amp;gt; Date: Wed Feb 1 14:41:59 201</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 11:56:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408373</link>
</item><item>
<title>WebDAV and ACL (RFC3744), status?</title>
<description>Good evening. Where can I find out if httpd/mod_dav has support for ACL&amp;#039;s? After digging in the mailinglist, there seem to have been some activity a</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 07:38:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408364</link>
</item><item>
<title>APR_POOL_DEBUG</title>
<description>Hi, I have just compiled apr 1.4.5 with -DAPR_POOL_DEBUG=0x1f and --enable-threads. Is this a valid configuration? Is it supposed to survive &amp;quot;make ch</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 06:52:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408363</link>
</item><item>
<title>Fwd: svn commit: r1238824 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ CHANGES server/core.c</title>
<description>-------- Original Message -------- Subject:    svn commit: r1238824 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ CHANGES server/core.c Date:  Tue, 31 Jan</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 00:42:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408338</link>
</item><item>
<title>Apache HTTP Server 2.2.22 Released</title>
<description>Apache HTTP Server 2.2.22 Released   The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache HTTP Server Project are  pleased to announce the release of ver</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 14:33:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408324</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1238824 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ CHANGES server/core.c</title>
<description>On 31.01.2012 22:50, sf@apache.org wrote: &amp;gt; Author: sf &amp;gt; Date: Tue Jan 31 21:50:03 2012 &amp;gt; New Revision: 1238824 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 14:32:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408323</link>
</item><item>
<title>Questions on open ports between trunk and 2.4.x</title>
<description>I backported some trunk changes to 2.4.x (mostly cosmetic ones) and a few changes also in the other direction to keep code changes small in parts we</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 07:07:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408231</link>
</item><item>
<title>Need feedback for proposed changes in Apache source</title>
<description>Hi, We are using Apache 2.2.21 with our product in HP. As we all know that during some failure operations, Windows OS stores the memory dump as .mdmp</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 03:27:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408215</link>
</item><item>
<title>1.3 patches for recent security issues (funny or not, depending on your situation)</title>
<description>Notes to the general public: * This is not necessarily a complete list, depending on your idea of &amp;quot;recent&amp;quot;. * These are not official patches. * These</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 13:54:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408170</link>
</item><item>
<title>Rename apachectl prior to 2.4.1 tag?</title>
<description>On 1/30/2012 3:12 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; And there is apachectl, not httpdctl. Would anyone else like to see this changed, now, for the 2.4 r</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 13:53:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408169</link>
</item><item>
<title>2.4.1….??</title>
<description>Do I dare float the idea of a 2.4.1 T&amp;amp;R &amp;quot;very soon&amp;quot;??</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 12:11:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408158</link>
</item><item>
<title>[ANNOUNCE] Apache-Test 1.37</title>
<description>Apache-Test 1.37 is coming to a CPAN mirror near you. Thanks to several different contributors for this release!  md5: 179f247fc5c7d11387b9c73ae3fa</description>
<pubDate>29 Jan  2012 11:57:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408103</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] trunk/2.4 core output filter is broken</title>
<description>On Wednesday 25 January 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote: &amp;gt; Looking over the code, impl as a hook seems more &amp;quot;isolated&amp;quot;, &amp;gt; rather than the current impl which</description>
<pubDate>29 Jan  2012 11:53:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408102</link>
</item><item>
<title>Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2012/01/29]</title>
<description>+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bugzilla Bug ID</description>
<pubDate>28 Jan  2012 23:15:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408087</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Discuss] httpd 2.2.22 release</title>
<description>On 1/28/2012 12:36 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; When there&amp;#039;s 1.4.2 with rough edges resolved, that&amp;#039;s another matter. Depending on which rough edges,</description>
<pubDate>28 Jan  2012 11:16:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408076</link>
</item><item>
<title>FYI - 2.2.22/win32</title>
<description>Running into make recursion issues for the first and only time I&amp;#039;ve ever observed this on Windows; not sure what is going on with it. I&amp;#039;ll be struggl</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 21:05:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408059</link>
</item><item>
<title>2.3.16 rewrite bug wrt query strings</title>
<description>I just reverted www.apache.org back to 2.3.15 due to  a bug in query-string handling for mod_rewrite in 2.3.16. For some reason query-strings are no</description>
<pubDate>26 Jan  2012 10:11:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408016</link>
</item><item>
<title>Additional info in build</title>
<description>Hello, When dealing with config running on different platforms (ex: Linux/Solaris/Windows, 32/64 bits), it is very difficult to write a generic con</description>
<pubDate>26 Jan  2012 01:35:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408003</link>
</item><item>
<title>Fwd: svn commit: r1235968 - /httpd/site/trunk/tools/release.sh</title>
<description>cc dev to ensure everyone is aware of any hidden fiat Jim accuses me of, in case there are committers who aren&amp;#039;t subscribed to cvs@httpd.a.o.  -----</description>
<pubDate>25 Jan  2012 16:13:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407993</link>
</item><item>
<title>[recalled]: [Vote] httpd 2.2.18 release</title>
<description>Sorry, cut and paste errors ;/</description>
<pubDate>25 Jan  2012 15:03:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407989</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Vote] httpd 2.2.22 release</title>
<description>Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ - these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts (x86 bin</description>
<pubDate>25 Jan  2012 14:59:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407988</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Vote] httpd 2.2.18 release</title>
<description>Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ - these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts (x86 bin</description>
<pubDate>25 Jan  2012 14:53:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407987</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1235968 - /httpd/site/trunk/tools/release.sh</title>
<description>Hold on... we&amp;#039;re now gonna be shipping apu 1.4 w/ 2.2? Where was that decided? If we complain about using updated libtools/etc when building these, du</description>
<pubDate>25 Jan  2012 14:01:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407979</link>
</item><item>
<title>Ip address parser bug?</title>
<description>Hi all, Recently I ran into a strange ip parsing bug in a Allow from or Deny from statement. When you have a colon in comment after the from &amp;lt;ip&amp;gt; sta</description>
<pubDate>25 Jan  2012 09:58:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407956</link>
</item><item>
<title>who is working on getting security patches proposed for 2.0.65?</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ll start with the patch for CVE-2011-4317.</description>
<pubDate>25 Jan  2012 05:00:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407945</link>
</item><item>
<title>T&amp;amp;R 2.2.22 in T-12hrs today (was: need for release managers)</title>
<description>On 1/17/2012 11:52 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I can tag and roll 2.0.65 and 2.2.22 today, if that&amp;#039;s the desire of the project. As I had prom</description>
<pubDate>25 Jan  2012 00:27:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407940</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1234169 - in /httpd/mod_fcgid/trunk/modules/fcgid:</title>
<description>Bill, In PR 50309, the submitted patch moved the apr_pool_cleanup_register() call from procmgr_child_init to the tail end of procmgr_post_config in f</description>
<pubDate>23 Jan  2012 17:29:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407913</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1234437 - in /httpd/mod_fcgid/trunk: NOTICE-FCGID modules/fcgid/fcgid_conf.h</title>
<description>On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 5:49 PM, &amp;lt;wrowe@apache.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Author: wrowe &amp;gt; Date: Sat Jan 21 22:49:25 2012 &amp;gt; New Revision: 1234437 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; URL: http://s</description>
<pubDate>23 Jan  2012 07:50:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407869</link>
</item><item>
<title>Include strangeness</title>
<description>Apart from the fact that the docs to Include do not match the code and IncludeOptional is not documented at all, the way Include interacts with dire</description>
<pubDate>22 Jan  2012 10:14:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407809</link>
</item><item>
<title>2.2.22</title>
<description>Seems to me that there&amp;#039;s enough to warrant a 2.2.22 release... As long as we&amp;#039;re doing a 2.4.1, why not also provide a 2.2.22 at the same time? I offe</description>
<pubDate>22 Jan  2012 07:20:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407806</link>
</item><item>
<title>[RESCINDED ]Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.0</title>
<description>I am rescinding the vote for 2.4.0. Instead, on Monday (or Tuesday at the latest) I will T&amp;amp;R 2.4.1. I will keep these test tarballs around so that Wi</description>
<pubDate>22 Jan  2012 06:53:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407805</link>
</item><item>
<title>Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2012/01/22]</title>
<description>+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bugzilla Bug ID</description>
<pubDate>21 Jan  2012 23:15:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407798</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1234336 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: include/ap_release.h server/util_expr_parse.c server/util_expr_parse.h</title>
<description>On 21.01.2012 15:38, jim@apache.org wrote: &amp;gt; Author: jim &amp;gt; Date: Sat Jan 21 14:38:25 2012 &amp;gt; New Revision: 1234336 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewv</description>
<pubDate>21 Jan  2012 08:29:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407790</link>
</item><item>
<title>Discuss: Dropping dsw/dsp files</title>
<description>On 1/20/2012 11:30 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: &amp;gt; On 1/20/2012 1:03 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On 1/20/2012 10:40 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>20 Jan  2012 12:06:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407761</link>
</item><item>
<title>trunk/2.4 core output filter is broken</title>
<description>The main loop in the core output filter (rewritten since 2.2) will try to read the entire passed-in brigade into RAM for CGI/PIPE-like mutating buck</description>
<pubDate>20 Jan  2012 08:52:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407748</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1233882 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/core_filters.c</title>
<description>On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 7:41 AM, &amp;lt;jorton@apache.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Author: jorton &amp;gt; Date: Fri Jan 20 12:41:18 2012 &amp;gt; New Revision: 1233882 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; URL: http:/</description>
<pubDate>20 Jan  2012 05:56:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407745</link>
</item><item>
<title>Segfault in openssl&amp;#039;s err_cmp when using SSLCryptoDevice and new SSLProxyMachineCertificateChainFile</title>
<description>All;  I stumbled across this yesterday and was hoping some of our more experienced openssl developers may be able to offer suggestions on how I can</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2012 08:40:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407669</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] CVE-2011-3368, CVE-2011-4317, trunk</title>
<description>Following the thread http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/201112.mbox/%3CCAKUrXK4uwT%3DP1KtEziNqFdxXs%2BtyWvggzpL8x2u-Bbq8tZ-Zsw%40mail.</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2012 08:16:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407659</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: apply_to_2.2.21 -- please review</title>
<description>On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Eric Covener &amp;lt;covener@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve collected the 3 backported security fixes pending for 2.2.22 and &amp;gt; tr</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2012 05:43:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407656</link>
</item><item>
<title>STATUS file and BUGZ</title>
<description>Could I ask people who have &amp;quot;issues&amp;quot; with the GA to ensure:  1. That there are actual bug reports associated with those issues  2. That, if a show-</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2012 04:39:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407655</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1232575 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/configure.in</title>
<description>On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:12:19PM -0000, Graham Leggett wrote: ... &amp;gt; @@ -88,6 +96,9 @@ if test &amp;quot;$apr_found&amp;quot; = &amp;quot;no&amp;quot;; then &amp;gt; fi &amp;gt;  &amp;gt; if test &amp;quot;$apr_f</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2012 02:39:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407646</link>
</item><item>
<title>t/modules/cgi.t (was: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.0)</title>
<description>On Tuesday 17 January 2012, Graham Leggett wrote: &amp;gt; On 17 Jan 2012, at 11:52 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; This doesn&amp;#039;t look right. It should look lik</description>
<pubDate>17 Jan  2012 14:11:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407615</link>
</item><item>
<title>documenting -deps</title>
<description>* Are we committed to providing the -deps for 2.4&amp;#039;s lifetime, or would we doc it with some weasel language? * Does anyone care if we&amp;#039;re not committed</description>
<pubDate>17 Jan  2012 12:07:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407580</link>
</item><item>
<title>SSL and windows with AcceptFilter https none</title>
<description>All;  I have submitted PR 52476 to track and document this bug. I&amp;#039;ve uploaded the logs from my tests where I was able to duplicate the problem. http</description>
<pubDate>17 Jan  2012 07:37:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407546</link>
</item><item>
<title>[VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.0</title>
<description>The 2.4.0 (prerelease) tarballs are available for download and test:     http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I&amp;#039;m calling a VOTE on releasing these</description>
<pubDate>16 Jan  2012 09:50:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407510</link>
</item><item>
<title>2.4.0 T&amp;amp;R happening today…</title>
<description>I will be doing the T&amp;amp;R of Apache httpd 2.4.0 later on today... w00t!</description>
<pubDate>16 Jan  2012 06:47:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407497</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1231605 - /apr/apr/trunk/tables/apr_hash.c</title>
<description>Bojan Smojver wrote: &amp;gt; On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 18:06 +0100, Bert Huijben wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; If the timer has enough detail we could just use the time, ptr &amp;gt;&amp;gt; com</description>
<pubDate>16 Jan  2012 05:11:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407492</link>
</item><item>
<title>Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2012/01/15]</title>
<description>+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bugzilla Bug ID</description>
<pubDate>14 Jan  2012 23:15:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407453</link>
</item><item>
<title>Proxy and cookies (2.3.16)</title>
<description>Please have also a look at http://www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?p=20232 Looks a regression.</description>
<pubDate>13 Jan  2012 03:09:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407403</link>
</item><item>
<title>Time for 2.4.0 GA??</title>
<description>Things look stable. Things look good. Things look happy. Sooooo are we ready to finally make this happen?? I offer to RM.</description>
<pubDate>11 Jan  2012 08:37:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407356</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Off-list question</title>
<description>On 1/10/2012 12:54 PM, Mark J Cox wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; This is untrue. There is no mechanism for the remote attacker to exploit &amp;gt;&amp;gt; creating malicious .htaccess</description>
<pubDate>10 Jan  2012 10:58:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407340</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1229024 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod: mod_heartbeat.xml mod_heartmonitor.xml</title>
<description>On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 11:20 PM, &amp;lt;sctemme@apache.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Author: sctemme &amp;gt; Date: Mon Jan  9 04:20:46 2012 &amp;gt; New Revision: 1229024 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; URL: http</description>
<pubDate>10 Jan  2012 07:43:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407338</link>
</item><item>
<title>Style rule change?</title>
<description>On 1/8/2012 12:04 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: &amp;gt; on the other side: I&amp;#039;ve asked me already often if we shouldnt increase the maxchar/line; I &amp;gt; believe that</description>
<pubDate>08 Jan  2012 22:29:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407257</link>
</item><item>
<title>Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2012/01/08]</title>
<description>+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bugzilla Bug ID</description>
<pubDate>07 Jan  2012 23:15:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407239</link>
</item><item>
<title>Fwd: svn commit: r1228700 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs: STATUS manual/mod/mod_heartbeat.xml manual/mod/mod_heartmonitor.xml manual/mod/mod_watchdog.xml manual/mod/mod_watchdog.xml.meta</title>
<description>Folks,  I&amp;#039;ve put in some updates to the mod_heart* modules, taken from the README supplied with the modules and some perusal of the source code. I h</description>
<pubDate>07 Jan  2012 11:22:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407225</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1227860 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/modules/proxy: ajp_msg.c mod_proxy.h proxy_util.c</title>
<description>On Thursday 05 January 2012, wrowe@apache.org wrote: &amp;gt; Author: wrowe &amp;gt; Date: Thu Jan 5 21:55:43 2012 &amp;gt; New Revision: 1227860 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; URL: http://svn.apa</description>
<pubDate>06 Jan  2012 06:50:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407182</link>
</item><item>
<title>Fwd: [users@httpd] Invalid URI in request OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0</title>
<description>Looks like SuSE backported the trunk fix which misfires on the internally dummy conn. STATUS says we were thinking of flipping this to declined. Loo</description>
<pubDate>06 Jan  2012 06:32:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407179</link>
</item><item>
<title>Style issue</title>
<description>Reading the declaration of AP_DECLARE(void *) ap_realloc(void *ptr, size_t size)                ap_func_attr_warn_unused_result; macr</description>
<pubDate>05 Jan  2012 16:56:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407167</link>
</item><item>
<title>Style violations</title>
<description>modules\proxy\mod_proxy.h entirely violates our 80 column rule, which is particularly offensive owing to the fact that the .h files are the easiest re</description>
<pubDate>05 Jan  2012 13:56:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407164</link>
</item><item>
<title>Function abuse/cpu wasteage?</title>
<description>modules\proxy\mod_proxy_balancer.c:          PROXY_STRNCPY(bsel-&amp;gt;s-&amp;gt;lb pname, val); modules\proxy\mod_proxy_balancer.c:          P</description>
<pubDate>05 Jan  2012 13:24:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407163</link>
</item><item>
<title>Build-Warnings httpd 2.4.x Visual Studio 10, 32 Bit</title>
<description>During the Build for Windows 32 Bit I get the following warnings: mod_data.c(112): warning C4244: &amp;#039;function&amp;#039; : conversion from &amp;#039;apr_off_t&amp;#039; to &amp;#039;int&amp;#039;,</description>
<pubDate>04 Jan  2012 06:03:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407129</link>
</item><item>
<title>default user/group -- daemon/daemon versus something else (AIX uses nobody/nobody traditionally)</title>
<description>Hi all, I am working on the bits and pieces to get a DESTDIR build packaged into an installable package. On AIX the user/group daemon/daemon does not</description>
<pubDate>04 Jan  2012 00:28:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407118</link>
</item><item>
<title>How are requested URIs translated into local resource names? (where is the &amp;quot;ap_run_translate_name&amp;quot; function?)</title>
<description>Hi, all, Happy new year!!! I&amp;#039;m trying to understand how are the requested URIs translated into local resource names in Apache. For example, how does</description>
<pubDate>04 Jan  2012 00:14:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407113</link>
</item><item>
<title>Backtrace on Windows Docu outdated</title>
<description>http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html#backtrace-win There is no Dr Watson anymore in Windows Server 2008.  Steffen</description>
<pubDate>03 Jan  2012 10:48:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407096</link>
</item><item>
<title>remove mod_heart* from 2.4?(was: 2.4.0 GA This week?)</title>
<description>On Monday 02 January 2012, Takashi Sato wrote: &amp;gt; mod_heartbeat &amp;gt; mod_heartmonitor &amp;gt; mod_lbmethod_heartbeat &amp;gt; &amp;gt; These have no documentation. &amp;gt; Is that</description>
<pubDate>02 Jan  2012 14:06:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407025</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: svn commit: r1226477 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual: misc/security_tips.html.en misc/security_tips.xml mod/mod_access_compat.html.en mod/mod_access_compat.xml sections.html.en sections.xml</title>
<description>On 02 Jan 2012, at 7:18 PM, covener@apache.org wrote: &amp;gt; Author: covener &amp;gt; Date: Mon Jan 2 17:18:39 2012 &amp;gt; New Revision: 1226477 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; URL: http://svn</description>
<pubDate>02 Jan  2012 09:27:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407015</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] mod_mbox: show list name in the &amp;lt;h1/&amp;gt;</title>
<description>Henri Yandell (Created) (JIRA) wrote on Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 06:03:30 +0000: &amp;gt; Note list name on mail detail page &amp;gt; ----------------------------------</description>
<pubDate>02 Jan  2012 08:50:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/407014</link>
</item><item>
<title>2.4.0 GA This week?</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m proposing a T&amp;amp;R of 2.4.0 this week with a release sometime next week... I&amp;#039;ll RM.</description>
<pubDate>01 Jan  2012 09:47:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/406977</link>
</item><item>
<title>Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2012/01/01]</title>
<description>+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bugzilla Bug ID</description>
<pubDate>31 Dec  2011 23:15:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/406975</link>
</item><item>
<title>long timeout on overloaded mod_fcgid</title>
<description>Hi, When some vhost&amp;#039;s scripts exhaust all process slots available to it (FcgidMaxProcessesPerClass), next requests are waiting for over 60 seconds be</description>
<pubDate>29 Dec  2011 04:04:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/406927</link>
</item><item>
<title>Advanced status table?</title>
<description>Since 2.3.? there is this nice overview table in the server-status page. http://www.images-hack.de/bild.php/15079,statusKCQ3G.png Since it shows the</description>
<pubDate>28 Dec  2011 10:25:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/406902</link>
</item><item>
<title>Fwd: svn commit: r1225199 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: docs/log-message-tags/next-number server/core.c</title>
<description>-------- Original-Nachricht -------- Betreff:    svn commit: r1225199 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: docs/log-message-tags/next-number server/core.c Dat</description>
<pubDate>28 Dec  2011 07:39:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/406896</link>
</item><item>
<title>Looking for Windows testers for r1225199</title>
<description>Hi, &amp;gt; Author: sf &amp;gt; Date: Wed Dec 28 14:54:49 2011 &amp;gt; New Revision: 1225199 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1225199&amp;amp;view=rev &amp;gt; Log: &amp;gt; Check</description>
<pubDate>28 Dec  2011 06:57:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/406895</link>
</item><item>
<title>Win 2.3.16 :: SSL and AcceptFilter</title>
<description>Reported here already the issue. Also in the AL forum is one with the same issue. Still there definitly is an issue with Acceptfilter and SSL.  When</description>
<pubDate>27 Dec  2011 07:46:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/406858</link>
</item><item>
<title>httpd-2.3.16-beta &amp;quot;make install&amp;quot; fails...</title>
<description>AIX 5.3.7 xlC v7  After &amp;quot;minor&amp;quot; edits, compiles (with warnings) root@x105:[/data/prj/httpd-2.3.16-beta]./httpd -V Server version: Apache/2.3.16 (Uni</description>
<pubDate>27 Dec  2011 05:56:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/406851</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

