Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 08 Nov 2009 20:07:02 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Stefan Fritsch wrote on 2009-11-07 11:24:03: > Shouldn't you use something like this? > > BrowserMatch "MSIE [2-5]" nokeepalive ssl-unclean-shutdown 08 Nov 2009 16:53:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376443 +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bugzilla Bug ID 08 Nov 2009 15:08:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376442 +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bugzilla Bug ID 08 Nov 2009 15:08:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376441 Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > >> Actually Steve - you may know - what besides the obvious >> >> extendedKeyUsage=nsSG 08 Nov 2009 04:47:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376436 On 06/11/09 20:07, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> >> I'd like we remove the entire forwarding proxy stuff >> for example. > So we have mod_forward_proxy an 08 Nov 2009 00:56:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376433 On 11/07/2009 08:19 PM, sf@apache.org wrote: > Author: sf > Date: Sat Nov 7 19:19:10 2009 > New Revision: 833738 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/view 07 Nov 2009 17:45:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376432 Kaspar Brand wrote: > Dr Stephen Henson wrote: >> A few comments about that: > > Thanks for the review! > >> These are cryptographic keys (or at lea 07 Nov 2009 09:35:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376421 Dr Stephen Henson wrote: > A few comments about that: Thanks for the review! > These are cryptographic keys (or at least the HMAC and AES keys are) 07 Nov 2009 06:56:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376417 Kaspar Brand wrote: +#if !defined(OPENSSL_NO_TLSEXT) && OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 0x009080d0 +#define TICK_KEYS_LEN sizeof(((SSL_CTX *)0)->tlsext_t 07 Nov 2009 04:21:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376416 Kaspar Brand wrote: > Does that sound reasonable? If so, I would prepare a new patch with > SSL_CTX_set_tlsext_ticket_keys and the new config directiv 07 Nov 2009 03:06:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376415 On Saturday 07 November 2009, Lars Eilebrecht wrote: > Ruediger Pluem wrote on 2009-11-07 00:29:41: > > > -BrowserMatch ".*MSIE.*" \ > > > - n 07 Nov 2009 02:24:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376414 On 7 Nov 2009, at 06:25, Brian Rectanus wrote: > Yes, mod_security requires it. Many who use mod_security may not even > realize it. It would be a 07 Nov 2009 01:28:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376429 On 11/07/2009 02:21 AM, Lars Eilebrecht wrote: > Ruediger Pluem wrote on 2009-11-07 00:29:41: > >>> -BrowserMatch ".*MSIE.*" \ >>> - nokeepal 07 Nov 2009 01:09:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376413 On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Ruediger Pluem <rpluem@apache.org> wrote: > > > On 11/06/2009 06:45 AM, Nick Kew wrote: >> On 6 Nov 2009, at 05:30, S 06 Nov 2009 22:25:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376412 Ruediger Pluem wrote on 2009-11-07 00:29:41: > > -BrowserMatch ".*MSIE.*" \ > > - nokeepalive ssl-unclean-shutdown \ > > - downgrade- 06 Nov 2009 17:21:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376410 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Subject: CVE-2009-3555 - apache/mod_ssl vulnerability and mitigation Apache httpd is affected by CVE-2 06 Nov 2009 17:21:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376409 Folks, This is Vipul Gupta's patch (Bugzilla 40132) against today's trunk. This compiles and works under some manual testing. Looks like OpenSSL 06 Nov 2009 16:41:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376408 Joe Orton wrote: > Awesome, thanks a lot! > > +1 for backport to 2.2.x here too. +1 here from me as well. So the trunk patch is svn diff -r8 06 Nov 2009 16:23:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376407 On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 12:37:56AM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > On 11/06/2009 11:33 PM, jorton@apache.org wrote: > > Author: jorton > > Date: Fri No 06 Nov 2009 16:08:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376401 On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 03:19:12PM -0800, Lars Eilebrecht wrote: > attached is a slightly different patch, it includes "!EXP" and I've > moved the dir 06 Nov 2009 15:57:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376400 On 11/06/2009 11:33 PM, jorton@apache.org wrote: > Author: jorton > Date: Fri Nov 6 22:33:19 2009 > New Revision: 833582 > > URL: http://svn.apache. 06 Nov 2009 15:37:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376399 On 11/07/2009 12:19 AM, Lars Eilebrecht wrote: > Hi, > > attached is a slightly different patch, it includes "!EXP" and I've > moved the directive ou 06 Nov 2009 15:29:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376398 Joe Orton wrote: > On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 03:09:22AM +0000, Joe Orton wrote: >> A second hack, slightly less rough hack: > > I committed this in r833 06 Nov 2009 15:28:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376397 Hi, attached is a slightly different patch, it includes "!EXP" and I've moved the directive out of the vhost into the main server config (there's not 06 Nov 2009 15:19:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376396 On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 03:09:22AM +0000, Joe Orton wrote: > A second hack, slightly less rough hack: I committed this in r833582 with some minor cha 06 Nov 2009 14:49:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376395 Ruediger Pluem wrote: > I guess how much in the cert case also depends on the clients browser settings > and its user (does it send a certificate eve 06 Nov 2009 14:31:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376394 After further editing. Timeline is to do this shortly after Joe's patch gets the needed votes. Dw. To: announce@httpd.apache.org Subject: CVE-2 06 Nov 2009 14:30:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376393 On 11/06/2009 10:58 PM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > So what are the next steps here ? > > - Joe's patch is final. > > - Give the community 06 Nov 2009 14:27:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376392 With some feedback from various folks. Thanks, Dw. Apache httpd is affected by CVE-2009-3555[1] (The SSL Injectin or MiM attack[2]). We strongly 06 Nov 2009 14:13:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376385 So what are the next steps here ? - Joe's patch is final. - Give the community the advice 'immediately' - with a website update 06 Nov 2009 13:58:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376384 On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 01:04:01PM -0800, Lars Eilebrecht wrote: > I would like to propose the attached patch for inclusion in 2.2 > (I'll commit to t 06 Nov 2009 13:55:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376383 Rainer Jung wrote on 2009-11-06 22:31:55: > Because of the EXP- ciphers still contained in the new one, we might > add !EXPORT: > > ALL:!ADH:!EXPORT 06 Nov 2009 13:54:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376382 On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 01:04:01PM -0800, Lars Eilebrecht wrote: > I would like to propose the attached patch for inclusion in 2.2 (I'll > commit to 06 Nov 2009 13:53:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376381 On 06.11.2009 22:04, Lars Eilebrecht wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose the attached patch for inclusion in 2.2 > (I'll commit to trunk soon un 06 Nov 2009 13:31:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376380 2009/11/7 Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com>: > That's fine, though I think Thrift will give a cleaner model to perform and > handle the requests. > > Most 06 Nov 2009 13:16:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376379 Hi, I would like to propose the attached patch for inclusion in 2.2 (I'll commit to trunk soon unless I'm getting any -1s in response to this email). 06 Nov 2009 13:04:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376378 On Nov 5, 2009, at 4:17 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 05/11/09 12:38, Graham Leggett wrote: >> Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >>> Let's get 2.4 out. And then 06 Nov 2009 11:07:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376377 On Nov 6, 2009, at 8:11 AM, Akins, Brian wrote: > On 11/5/09 6:08 PM, "Greg Stein" <gstein@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I think a lot of your discussion ca 06 Nov 2009 11:04:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376376 Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > > So I guess the one thing we need now is to double check with the OpenSSL > folks if the basic concept of this patch 06 Nov 2009 11:00:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376375 2009/11/6 Colm MacCárthaigh <colm@allcosts.net>: > On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Joe Orton <jorton@redhat.com> wrote >> 3. some mod_ssl configuratio 06 Nov 2009 10:57:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376374 Joe Orton wrote: > On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 12:00:06AM +0000, Joe Orton wrote: >> Here is a very rough first hack (for discussion/testing >> purpo 06 Nov 2009 10:54:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376373 Joe Orton wrote: > On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 12:00:06AM +0000, Joe Orton wrote: >> Here is a very rough first hack (for discussion/testing purposes onl 06 Nov 2009 10:45:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376372 On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Joe Orton <jorton@redhat.com> wrote > 3. some mod_ssl configurations, typically requiring client cert auth in > a per- 06 Nov 2009 10:24:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376371 That's fine, though I think Thrift will give a cleaner model to perform and handle the requests. Mostly I just wanted to point out an alternative to 06 Nov 2009 08:27:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376368 On 11/5/09 6:08 PM, "Greg Stein" <gstein@gmail.com> wrote: > I think a lot of your discussion can be easily passed off to Apache Thrift. > Let it han 06 Nov 2009 08:11:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376362 On 11/06/2009 06:45 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > On 6 Nov 2009, at 05:30, Sander Temme wrote: > >> Maybe my understanding is limited and my fu is weak, but 05 Nov 2009 23:02:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376342 On 6 Nov 2009, at 05:30, Sander Temme wrote: > Maybe my understanding is limited and my fu is weak, but I have > personally never had a use for mod 05 Nov 2009 21:45:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376340 Folks, Maybe my understanding is limited and my fu is weak, but I have personally never had a use for mod_unique_id. The only thing it does for 05 Nov 2009 21:30:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376339 On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 12:00:06AM +0000, Joe Orton wrote: > On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 09:31:00PM +0000, Joe Orton wrote: > > * we can detect in mod_ssl 05 Nov 2009 19:09:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376338 Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > >> Actually Steve - you may know - what besides the obvious >> >> extendedKeyUsage=nsSG 05 Nov 2009 19:09:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376337 Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > Actually Steve - you may know - what besides the obvious > > extendedKeyUsage=nsSGC,msSGC > > in the extension file ne 05 Nov 2009 18:21:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376336 Dr Stephen Henson wrote: > There are two separate types used by Mozilla (Step up?) and Microsoft SSL/TLS > (SGC?) implementations IIRC. One completes 05 Nov 2009 18:19:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376335 On a phone, so pls excuse my brevity... I think a lot of your discussion can be easily passed off to Apache Thrift. Let it handle all the message pas 05 Nov 2009 18:08:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376332 Dr Stephen Henson wrote: > There are two separate types used by Mozilla (Step up?) and Microsoft SSL/TLS > (SGC?) implementations IIRC. One completes 05 Nov 2009 18:07:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376331 Andrews, Rick wrote: > https://www.chase.com > https://www.wellsfargo.com > > But I suppose you'll need to locate an old international browser 05 Nov 2009 18:00:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376330 Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > we propably > only have the step up 'Server Gated Certs'* let to check. > > Does anyone have such a beast for testing 05 Nov 2009 17:52:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376329 So with Joe his patch doing the right thing it seems (would be nice if we could get Ben or the OpenSSL guys to confirm that) - that we propably only 05 Nov 2009 17:38:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376328 On 11/5/09 4:30 PM, "Graham Dumpleton" <graham.dumpleton@gmail.com> wrote: > Thoughts? Still digesting, but generally +1 to the entire post. -- B 05 Nov 2009 17:33:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376327 2009/11/5 Graham Leggett <minfrin@sharp.fm>: > Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> Let's get 2.4 out. And then let's rip it to shreds and drop >> buckets/brigad 05 Nov 2009 16:30:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376326 On 06.11.2009 01:12, Joe Orton wrote: > On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 12:00:06AM +0000, Joe Orton wrote: > FYI - Dirk points out that you can test this usin 05 Nov 2009 16:28:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376325 On 05/11/09 12:38, Graham Leggett wrote: > Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> Let's get 2.4 out. And then let's rip it to shreds and drop >> buckets/brigades a 05 Nov 2009 16:17:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376322 On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 12:00:06AM +0000, Joe Orton wrote: > On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 09:31:00PM +0000, Joe Orton wrote: > > * we can detect in mod_ssl 05 Nov 2009 16:12:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376321 On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 09:31:00PM +0000, Joe Orton wrote: > * we can detect in mod_ssl when the client is renegotiating by using the > callback inst 05 Nov 2009 16:00:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376320 On 11/05/2009 11:03 PM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > Joe Orton wrote: > >> * we can detect in mod_ssl when the client is renegotiating by using the 05 Nov 2009 14:17:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376315 Joe Orton wrote: > * we can detect in mod_ssl when the client is renegotiating by using the > callback installed using SSL_CTX_set_info_callback(), i 05 Nov 2009 14:03:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376314 On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 09:38:23PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > If server triggered renegotiation will not work at all, people will just ignore the 05 Nov 2009 13:31:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376313 How about support of openmp? Regards, Jie 05 Nov 2009 12:57:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376312 On 11/05/2009 06:32 PM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 03:39:06PM +0000, Ben Laurie wrote: >> Joe Orton wrote: >>> In the short term, I th 05 Nov 2009 12:38:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376311 On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 13:38 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote: > I'm keen to teach httpd v3.0 to work asynchronously throughout - still > maintaining the pr 05 Nov 2009 12:34:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376310 On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 03:39:06PM +0000, Ben Laurie wrote: > Joe Orton wrote: > > In the short term, I think it would be useful to have a new SSL_OP_ 05 Nov 2009 09:32:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376296 Joe Orton wrote: > With reference to the issue described here: > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg03948.html > > Considering th 05 Nov 2009 07:39:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376288 Hi Isn't the real simple cause the possiblity to 'upgrade' an "anonymous" session to a client authenticated one initiated by the server after seeing 05 Nov 2009 07:26:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376287 With reference to the issue described here: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg03948.html Considering the impact on mod_ssl, I'm ma 05 Nov 2009 06:01:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376279 Jim Jagielski wrote: > Let's get 2.4 out. And then let's rip it to shreds and drop > buckets/brigades and fold in serf. I think we should decide on 05 Nov 2009 03:38:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376278 On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Let's get 2.4 out. And then let's rip it to shreds and drop > buckets/brigades and fold in serf. I agree, 05 Nov 2009 02:18:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376274 Ruediger Pluem wrote: > I would like to see your comment on Steves comment regarding the usage of > SSL_CTX_set_tlsext_ticket_keys. That workaround d 04 Nov 2009 22:09:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376272 I'm with Jim, Head for 2.4 first. IIRC there was some talk about moving to a 'd' project, since httpd now does ftp (mod_ftp), echo, pop3,... and som 04 Nov 2009 15:58:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376254 on request, here is mod_fcgid: <http://zeus.kimaker.com/~chip/fcgid-scan/> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Paul Querna <paul@querna.org> wrote: > usi 04 Nov 2009 14:12:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376240 using the newer clang/llvm static analysis on httpd trunk: <http://zeus.kimaker.com/~chip/httpd-scan/> 04 Nov 2009 13:44:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376239 Let's get 2.4 out. And then let's rip it to shreds and drop buckets/brigades and fold in serf. On Nov 4, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Akins, Brian wrote: > So, 04 Nov 2009 11:30:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376230 So, after several conversations at Apachecon and on the list, we still have no real "vision" of how we want to move ahead with httpd "3.0." Or, if we 04 Nov 2009 10:26:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376229 On 11/04/2009 05:59 PM, Kaspar Brand wrote: > Ruediger Pluem wrote: >>> 2) In the SNI callback, it adjusts OpenSSL's session id context - which >>> m 04 Nov 2009 09:16:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376223 Ruediger Pluem wrote: > I guess your current patch fails on trunk since myModConfig(s))->nSessionCacheMode > is no longer present in trunk Oops, you' 04 Nov 2009 08:59:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376222 On 11/04/2009 10:35 AM, Kaspar Brand wrote: > Kamesh Jayachandran wrote: >> Reasonable fix for this on the server side is to apply SSL_OP_NO_TICKET > 04 Nov 2009 07:49:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376215 Kaspar Brand wrote: > Kamesh Jayachandran wrote: >> Reasonable fix for this on the server side is to apply SSL_OP_NO_TICKET >> patch and enable SSLSe 04 Nov 2009 04:33:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376208 Thanks Kaspar. I tested your patch against 2.2 branch on to my apache-2.2.12 and found it to be working. My observations: Without SSLSessionCache i 04 Nov 2009 02:43:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376202 Kamesh Jayachandran wrote: > Reasonable fix for this on the server side is to apply SSL_OP_NO_TICKET > patch and enable SSLSessionCache. There is ac 04 Nov 2009 01:35:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376200 Hi Jeff, Jeff Trawick schrieb: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ that's what I used all the time - but when I posted this didnt work, nor was a link dis 03 Nov 2009 18:15:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376197 On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Guenter Knauf <fuankg@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Tony, > Tony Stevenson schrieb: >> I'm sorry, I dont understand what you 03 Nov 2009 16:47:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376196 Hi Tony, Tony Stevenson schrieb: > I'm sorry, I dont understand what you want us to do. viewcv is working, > I just used it now. huh? well, I used nor 03 Nov 2009 15:17:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376194 I'm sorry, I dont understand what you want us to do. viewcv is working, I just used it now. As for the rest of your mail, you may need to explain it 03 Nov 2009 15:03:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376193 ... viewvc is gone now :( hope we can restore that soon .... also I would like to remind that some snapshot branches need changed, or otherwise they 03 Nov 2009 14:38:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376192 Hi, Guenter Knauf schrieb: > then please lets do: > > #ifndef HAVE_OCSP > #if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x00907000 > #define HAVE_OCSP > #include <op 03 Nov 2009 11:51:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376179 Hi Sander, sctemme@apache.org schrieb: > Author: sctemme > Date: Tue Nov 3 18:19:33 2009 > New Revision: 832496 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewv 03 Nov 2009 11:47:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376178 On 11/03/2009 07:19 PM, sctemme@apache.org wrote: > Author: sctemme > Date: Tue Nov 3 18:19:33 2009 > New Revision: 832496 > > URL: http://svn.apach 03 Nov 2009 11:45:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376177 Hello, I am currently dealing with a situation where the Apache httpd process becomes unresponsive for some time. At the end of this time, the Ap 03 Nov 2009 08:52:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376169 Hi, I have been searching for a guide on how to use the FcgidAccessChecker command with a PHP script. In my tests I have tried calling a PHP-script 03 Nov 2009 06:53:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376163 Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Brian Havard <brian.havard@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Jeff Trawick wrote: >> >>> APIs were 03 Nov 2009 06:19:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376162 Graham Leggett wrote: > Issac Goldstand wrote: > > I actually ended up solving it with the help of socache's source. I was having troubles with ap 02 Nov 2009 23:50:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376136 On 11/03/2009 12:28 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote: > Hi Ruediger, > Ruediger Pluem schrieb: >> I now get the following warnings on Linux: >> >> In file incl 02 Nov 2009 22:11:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376132