Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 04 Jul 2009 14:40:08 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Hi All, I am still unable to create a new thread inside the balancer_init function. Here the way that I tried. But in this way new thread was create 04 Jul 2009 12:13:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370117 On 06/20/2009 03:54 PM, rpluem@apache.org wrote: > Author: rpluem > Date: Sat Jun 20 13:54:23 2009 > New Revision: 786825 > > URL: http://svn.apache. 04 Jul 2009 00:57:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370114 Hi William Rowe, After upgrading Apache from version 2.059 to 2.0.63, in Netware the Apache process doesn't stop immediately but waits for some act 03 Jul 2009 05:00:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370100 On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 08:20:20PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > we have received a bug report [1] that a DoS is possible with > mod_deflate since i 03 Jul 2009 03:00:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370095 All, I just wanted to point someone to a recent snapshot of 2.2 branch, but found that there is none; we only have 2.0 branch and HEAD ... I think it 02 Jul 2009 16:14:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370080 Joe Orton wrote: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 01:37:22PM +0100, Nick Kew wrote: >> Joe Orton wrote: >> >>> 1) A *linear-time* search on a shm segment, us 02 Jul 2009 09:01:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370070 On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 01:37:22PM +0100, Nick Kew wrote: > Joe Orton wrote: > >> 1) A *linear-time* search on a shm segment, using strstr. > > 2) ... 02 Jul 2009 07:41:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370069 On 7/2/09 8:37 AM, "Nick Kew" <nick@webthing.com> wrote: > Not everyone who's concerned right now about slowloris has > iptables at their disposal. 02 Jul 2009 07:00:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370068 Joe Orton wrote: > 1) A *linear-time* search on a shm segment, using strstr. > 2) ... for each new connection. With the expectation that the shm se 02 Jul 2009 05:37:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370063 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 03:55:27PM +0200, Natanael Mignon - michael-wessel.de wrote: > I am currently working on - dirty, please have mercy - customiz 02 Jul 2009 04:48:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370062 On Jul 2, 2009, at 5:58 AM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 03:01:55PM -0000, niq@apache.org wrote: >> Author: niq >> Date: Wed Jul 1 15: 02 Jul 2009 04:32:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370061 On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 03:01:55PM -0000, niq@apache.org wrote: > Author: niq > Date: Wed Jul 1 15:01:55 2009 > New Revision: 790205 > > URL: http:/ 02 Jul 2009 02:58:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370059 Hi, please can anybody roughly tell me how to register a new thread under the main child thread pool .It is great help for me. Shaniro Herath. 01 Jul 2009 16:11:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370045 Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> + * The major difference is that mod_antiloris checks the scoreboard >> + * on every request. This implies a per-request ov 01 Jul 2009 13:58:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370041 Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > I am not sure if doing this for each connection (not each *request*) > is really that much of a performace hit. I used a mo 01 Jul 2009 12:59:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370040 On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:01 AM, <niq@apache.org> wrote: > Author: niq > Date: Wed Jul  1 15:01:55 2009 > New Revision: 790205 > > URL: http://svn.apa 01 Jul 2009 12:33:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370039 tOn 01.07.2009 17:01, niq@apache.org wrote: > Author: niq > Date: Wed Jul 1 15:01:55 2009 > New Revision: 790205 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/view 01 Jul 2009 12:31:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370038 h iroshan wrote: > > Hi William and Mladen, > > Thanks both of you but i am still struggling with my thread creation. I > create my background thre 01 Jul 2009 09:14:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370022 On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Nick Kew<nick@webthing.com> wrote: > Gonzalo Arana wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Keeping whitelist up to date is rather trick 01 Jul 2009 06:32:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370008 To avoid a ban on 89.0.0.13 also banning 9.0.0.1, we might want to include the separators in the strstr, as in the attached patch. 01 Jul 2009 06:30:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370007 On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Nick Kew<nick@webthing.com> wrote: > Gonzalo Arana wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Keeping whitelist up to date is rather trick 01 Jul 2009 06:12:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/370000 Gonzalo Arana wrote: > Hi, > > Keeping whitelist up to date is rather tricky. > > How about having any/all of these directives? > > # time between 01 Jul 2009 05:49:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369999 Nick Kew wrote: > I've actually hacked up mod_noloris to do exactly that. Was planning to > test-drive then post, but since you bring the matter up, 01 Jul 2009 05:45:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369998 Hi, Keeping whitelist up to date is rather tricky. How about having any/all of these directives? # time between accept(2) call and the full request 01 Jul 2009 05:33:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369997 Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com > <mailto:nick@webthing.com>> wrote: > > fredk2 wrote: > > 01 Jul 2009 05:04:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369996 On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com> wrote: > fredk2 wrote: > >> Hi Nick, >> >> I looked at the code (I am not a coder) and w 01 Jul 2009 04:57:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369995 shaniro herath wrote: > Hi Iroshan and All, > > Same problem here. I passed function with infinite while loop when > creating the thread . Thread c 01 Jul 2009 03:40:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369994 Hi Iroshan and All, Same problem here. I passed function with infinite while loop when creating the thread . Thread creation is done inside a functi 01 Jul 2009 03:23:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369993 Hi William and Mladen, Thanks both of you but i am still struggling with my thread creation. I create my background thread inside the balancer_init 01 Jul 2009 03:14:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369992 fredk2 wrote: > Hi Nick, > > I looked at the code (I am not a coder) and wondered what made you say "it's > geared clearly to the very small server. 01 Jul 2009 02:12:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369990 Hi Nick, I looked at the code (I am not a coder) and wondered what made you say "it's geared clearly to the very small server. " Rgds - Fred Nick 30 Jun 2009 18:56:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369983 Mladen Turk wrote: > Perhaps adding something like ap_preloaded_modules table to which > the module can assign itself. But I presume there'll be and i 30 Jun 2009 10:14:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369957 William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Mladen Turk wrote: > > See asp_module_lock - this is entire windows specific; I see. Nice trick. > you are right > th 30 Jun 2009 09:50:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369956 Mladen Turk wrote: > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >>> However it requires to be statically compiled so it >>> can survive the child death. >> >> *That' 30 Jun 2009 09:07:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369955 Thank you! Will file one shortly. On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Eric Covener<covener@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Toad 29 Jun 2009 22:19:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369939 William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> However it requires to be statically compiled so it >> can survive the child death. > > *That's* the reason for static 29 Jun 2009 22:09:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369938 On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Toadie<toadie643@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I think we may have discovered an issue with mod_proxy that 'could' 29 Jun 2009 21:24:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369937 Hello, I think we may have discovered an issue with mod_proxy that 'could' be used as an exploit to render an Apache server useless. I normally repo 29 Jun 2009 21:10:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369936 Hi Mladen Turk, Thank you very much. I roughly gone throug the mod_watchdog. I create my background thread inside the balancer_init method at mod_p 29 Jun 2009 15:08:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369929 Mladen Turk wrote: > > Take a look at trunk's mod_watchdog. > It should compile with 2.2 without a problem. > However it requires to be statically co 29 Jun 2009 13:47:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369924 h iroshan wrote: > Hi All > Actually I need *to* modify *Apache* and *run* one custom background > *thread*. In addition, my custom modules have *to* 29 Jun 2009 13:23:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369923 Hi All Actually I need *to* modify *Apache* and *run* one custom background *thread *. In addition, my custom modules have *to* be able *to* access th 29 Jun 2009 12:47:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369922 Hi Mladen Turk, Thank you .In Apache 2.2.x trunk there is no such a module mod_watchdog. Is this is from later version?. Can I compile this in DSO mo 29 Jun 2009 10:25:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369919 On Jun 23, 2009, at 8:39 PM, Akins, Brian wrote: > On 6/23/09 12:48 AM, "Paul Querna" <paul@querna.org> wrote: > >> Mitagation is the wrong approach. 29 Jun 2009 10:09:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369916 On Jun 24, 2009, at 5:18 AM, Joe Orton wrote: > > Regardless, the only thing I've ever wanted to see changed in the > server > which would somewhat 29 Jun 2009 10:08:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369915 On Jun 25, 2009, at 11:12 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Nick Kew wrote: >> >> Is this worth hacking up, or more trouble than it saves? > > It alr 29 Jun 2009 10:05:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369914 On Jun 24, 2009, at 8:54 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > Paul Querna wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 5:35 AM, jean-frederic clere<jfclere@gmail.co 29 Jun 2009 09:47:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369913 h iroshan wrote: > Hi All, > > I want to open a port to communicate my Apache hhtpd (2.2) with small > software run on a separate machine .Without a 29 Jun 2009 09:32:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369912 Hi All, I want to open a port to communicate my Apache hhtpd (2.2) with small software run on a separate machine .Without affecting the httpd how can 29 Jun 2009 09:01:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369911 many thanks it is working. Graham Dumpleton-2 wrote: > > 2009/6/29 Yahav <biran@lucent.com>: >> >> i would like to set the httpd instance to run as 29 Jun 2009 05:18:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369904 many thanks Graham Dumpleton-2 wrote: > > 2009/6/29 Yahav <biran@lucent.com>: >> >> i would like to set the httpd instance to run as standard linux 29 Jun 2009 05:17:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369903 2009/6/29 Yahav <biran@lucent.com>: > > i would like to set the httpd instance to run as standard linux daemon. the > daemon should be controlled by t 29 Jun 2009 03:04:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369899 i would like to set the httpd instance to run as standard linux daemon. the daemon should be controlled by the init daemon. the problem is that the ap 29 Jun 2009 02:38:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369898 +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bugzilla Bug ID 28 Jun 2009 23:08:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369894 +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bugzilla Bug ID 28 Jun 2009 23:08:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369893 Hi, we have received a bug report [1] that a DoS is possible with mod_deflate since it does not stop to compress large files even after the network 28 Jun 2009 11:20:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369889 Hi, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis schrieb: > I'm attaching the patch which fixes a typo in ap_mmn.h. thanks, fixed in trunk and 2.2 branch. Gün 27 Jun 2009 10:01:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369878 I'm attaching the patch which fixes a typo in ap_mmn.h. -- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis 27 Jun 2009 08:28:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369877 This is a discussion not a bugfix (yet) :) bugzilla@apache.org wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47392 > > --- Comment #4 26 Jun 2009 10:54:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369845 Dear list, as I am new to this list, I don't know but hope questions regarding mod_ssl are welcome? I am currently working on - dirty, please have m 26 Jun 2009 06:55:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369836 Stefan Fritsch wrote: > Nick Kew wrote: >> Is this worth hacking up, or more trouble than it saves? > > It seems it already exists (I haven't tested 25 Jun 2009 12:48:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369811 On 06/25/2009 04:19 PM, Nick Kew wrote: > Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: > >>> Is this worth hacking up, or more trouble than it saves? >> >> I guess 25 Jun 2009 10:43:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369808 On 06/25/2009 04:01 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: > > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Nick Kew >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Juni 25 Jun 2009 10:38:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369807 Nick Kew wrote: > > How would you keep an index keyed on client-IP using scoreboard? > Or did you have something else in mind? Exactly; this could n 25 Jun 2009 09:53:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369797 On 25 Jun 2009, at 16:12, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Nick Kew wrote: >> >> Is this worth hacking up, or more trouble than it saves? > > It already 25 Jun 2009 09:06:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369796 Nick Kew wrote: > > Is this worth hacking up, or more trouble than it saves? It already lives in /repos/asf/httpd/mod_ftp/trunk/modules/ftp/ ... see 25 Jun 2009 08:12:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369790 Nick Kew wrote: > Is this worth hacking up, or more trouble than it saves? It seems it already exists (I haven't tested it, though): ftp://ftp.monsho 25 Jun 2009 07:45:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369789 Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: >> Is this worth hacking up, or more trouble than it saves? > > I guess the approach is good, but there are already m 25 Jun 2009 07:19:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369788 > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Nick Kew > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Juni 2009 15:40 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: mod_noloris: mi 25 Jun 2009 07:01:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369787 On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Nick Kew<nick@webthing.com> wrote: > Is this worth hacking up, or more trouble than it saves? I think an ultra-simp 25 Jun 2009 06:57:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369786 I was just thinking about a quick&dirty fix we could offer to admins who are suddenly concerned about DoS attack. The following, backed by dbm or mem 25 Jun 2009 06:39:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369785 Eric Covener wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Johannes Müller<joh_m@gmx.de> wrote: > >> Yes should be no problem. Relicensing means I'll 24 Jun 2009 14:52:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369762 I thought I did but couldn't find it. I've create a new bug report: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47418 ~Jorge On Wed, Jun 24 24 Jun 2009 13:00:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369757 Paul Querna wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 5:35 AM, jean-frederic clere<jfclere@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I plan to use slotmem (additionally t 24 Jun 2009 05:54:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369743 2009/6/24 Kevin J Walters <Kevin.Walters@morganstanley.com>: > >>>>>> "M" == Matthieu Estrade <mestrade@apache.org> writes: > > M> More granular timeo 24 Jun 2009 02:57:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369740 >>>>> "M" == Matthieu Estrade <mestrade@apache.org> writes: M> More granular timeout and maybe adaptative timeout is also IMHO a good M> way to impro 24 Jun 2009 02:40:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369739 * Joe Orton <jorton@redhat.com> [2009-06-24 11:20]: >Meh. There will always be a maximum to the number of concurrent >connections a server can handl 24 Jun 2009 02:36:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369738 I totally agree with you. This first point the lack of tunning of httpd.conf, this kind of attack crash default setup of httpd.conf but a well setup 24 Jun 2009 02:32:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369737 The problem could happen also if a CL is sent and not enough data is posted. So i don't think control for complete headers will solve the entire probl 24 Jun 2009 02:23:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369736 On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 09:48:46PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote: > On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Andreas Krennmair<ak@synflood.at> wrote: > > Hello eve 24 Jun 2009 02:18:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369734 > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Graham Leggett > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Juni 2009 10:05 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Mitigat 24 Jun 2009 01:29:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369733 Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > So what we did in the mid '90 when we where hit by pretty much the same > was a bit simpler - any client which did not 24 Jun 2009 01:05:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369732 Akins, Brian wrote: > On 6/22/09 10:40 PM, "Weibin Yao"<nbubingo@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I have an idea to mitigate the problem: put the Nginx as a re 24 Jun 2009 00:54:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369731 On 6/23/09 12:48 AM, "Paul Querna" <paul@querna.org> wrote: > Mitagation is the wrong approach. > > We all know our architecture is wrong. Another 23 Jun 2009 17:39:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369729 On 6/22/09 10:40 PM, "Weibin Yao" <nbubingo@gmail.com> wrote: > I have an idea to mitigate the problem: put the Nginx as a reverse proxy > server in 23 Jun 2009 17:26:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369728 On Saturday 20 December 2008, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > for people who use a system wide mime.types as TypesConfig, it > would be nice if there was a wa 23 Jun 2009 13:25:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369725 On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 5:35 AM, jean-frederic clere<jfclere@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I plan to use slotmem (additionally to the actual file based 23 Jun 2009 13:11:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369724 Kevin J Walters <Kevin.Walters@morganstanley.com> writes: > What's the recommended way to check for a connection having the > property of being kept 23 Jun 2009 08:20:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369708 Hi, What's the recommended way to check for a connection having the property of being kept alive? I was expecting to see tests like c->keepalive == 23 Jun 2009 06:51:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369707 Hi, I plan to use slotmem (additionally to the actual file based logic) in the heartbeat logic. HeartbeatStorage mem:logs/hb.dat (slotmem and key/sa 23 Jun 2009 05:35:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369691 On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Graham Dumpleton<graham.dumpleton@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/6/23 Weibin Yao <nbubingo@gmail.com>: >> William A. Rowe, 22 Jun 2009 21:51:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369676 On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Andreas Krennmair<ak@synflood.at> wrote: > Hello everyone, ..... > The basic principle is that the timeout for new co 22 Jun 2009 21:48:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369675 2009/6/23 Weibin Yao <nbubingo@gmail.com>: > William A. Rowe, Jr. at 2009-6-23 2:00 wrote: >> >> Andreas Krennmair wrote: >> >>> >>> * Guenter Knauf < 22 Jun 2009 21:07:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369674 William A. Rowe, Jr. at 2009-6-23 2:00 wrote: > Andreas Krennmair wrote: > >> * Guenter Knauf <fuankg@apache.org> [2009-06-22 04:30]: >> >>> w 22 Jun 2009 19:40:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369673 Hi, How about coding a module looking how many bytes are read and if there is too little chunk of data, close the connection. Something like a MinDat 22 Jun 2009 14:46:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369672 Look: $ ~/micex/opt/httpd-worker/bin/apxs -c -o mod_proxy.so mod_proxy.c proxy_util.c /home/marko/micex/opt/httpd-worker/build/libtool --silent --mod 22 Jun 2009 14:43:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369671 On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 02:23:12PM +0200, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: >>> - Seriously rewrite apache/add a worker which mimics the >>> accept_filt 22 Jun 2009 13:46:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369665 hi Kevac Marko, apxs -c -o mod_proxy.so mod_proxy.c proxy_util.c above command not generate mod_proxy.so . Please help me Regards Iroshan 22 Jun 2009 13:14:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369664 hi Kevac Marko, Thank you very much. 22 Jun 2009 13:06:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369663 apxs -c -o mod_proxy.so mod_proxy.c proxy_util.c On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:00 PM, h iroshan <iroshanmail@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I need to 22 Jun 2009 12:55:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/369662