Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 11:31:09 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Hi Lucien, On 12.02.2012 17:08, lgentis@apache.org wrote: > Author: lgentis > Date: Sun Feb 12 16:08:31 2012 > New Revision: 1243272 > > URL: http:// 12 Feb 2012 10:14:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408784 Bug 52402[1] isn't working yet. I wonder why it is marked as fixed in 2.4.x CHANGES[2] The shared memory stuff doesn't work yet on windows. Odd Behav 12 Feb 2012 07:57:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408782 I've been asked to hold off until tomorrow (Monday) morning... On Feb 9, 2012, at 9:03 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > A heads up that I plan to T&R 2.4. 12 Feb 2012 07:34:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408781 I just notived the following sentence on our front page: Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996, and cel 12 Feb 2012 07:10:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408780 Hi, In many places of httpd, we are skipping white spaces with code that looks like : while (*l && apr_isspace(*l)) { ++l; } The fi 11 Feb 2012 23:59:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408767 +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bugzilla Bug ID 11 Feb 2012 23:15:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408766 On 11 Feb 2012, at 1:56 PM, Michael Felt wrote: > After finishing the httpd2.2.22 working on the httpd2.4.X > First issue, no pcre so did a "build/ai 11 Feb 2012 04:19:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408742 After finishing the httpd2.2.22 working on the httpd2.4.X First issue, no pcre so did a "build/aix" of pcre and restarted. APR/APU is from apr project 11 Feb 2012 03:56:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408741 * Rainer Jung wrote: > Should be move ab, apxs and logrotate back to section 8? I think they > have been there until version 2.2.21 and moving them t 10 Feb 2012 14:22:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408731 Hi Andre, nice fix. One remark see below. On 10.02.2012 22:53, nd@apache.org wrote: > Author: nd > Date: Fri Feb 10 21:53:19 2012 > New Revision: 12 10 Feb 2012 14:11:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408725 * Graham Leggett wrote: > On 10 Feb 2012, at 9:55 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > > Since the build system is shared between at least 2.2, 2.4 and trunk, > 10 Feb 2012 11:59:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408705 > Can I ask for a bit more detail on how you actually do the move? > > I want to ensure that we preserve the history to show that the > release/ files 10 Feb 2012 05:21:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408696 On 10 Feb 2012, at 9:55 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Since the build system is shared between at least 2.2, 2.4 and trunk, this change also moved the man 10 Feb 2012 01:41:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408690 Hi Graham, On 20.12.2011 15:53, minfrin@apache.org wrote: > Author: minfrin > Date: Tue Dec 20 14:53:13 2011 > New Revision: 1221296 > > URL: http:// 09 Feb 2012 23:55:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408689 I'm looking into updating the JMeter release instructions to use the https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/ repo. AIUI you use dev/httpd/ for vote stagin 09 Feb 2012 17:25:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408684 On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:22 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > >> Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_fcgi.c >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/view 09 Feb 2012 08:51:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408670 On Feb 9, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > jim@apache.org wrote: >> Author: jim >> Date: Thu Feb 9 15:07:22 2012 >> New Revision: 1242351 09 Feb 2012 08:39:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408669 jim@apache.org wrote: > Author: jim > Date: Thu Feb 9 15:07:22 2012 > New Revision: 1242351 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1242351&view=r 09 Feb 2012 08:22:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408668 :) On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Graham Leggett <minfrin@sharp.fm> wrote: > On 09 Feb 2012, at 4:03 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > A heads up that 09 Feb 2012 07:34:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408667 On 09 Feb 2012, at 4:03 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > A heads up that I plan to T&R 2.4.1 within the next 48hrs... > Why 48hrs? To give people who might 09 Feb 2012 06:47:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408666 A heads up that I plan to T&R 2.4.1 within the next 48hrs... Why 48hrs? To give people who might either have patches/backports time to fold them in, a 09 Feb 2012 06:03:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408657 On 09 Feb 2012, at 12:38 PM, Michael Felt wrote: > Bit confused. > 1) reinstalled by build system from scratch > 2) installed apr/apu in /opt/bin > 3 09 Feb 2012 03:00:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408656 Hi, Bit confused. 1) reinstalled by build system from scratch 2) installed apr/apu in /opt/bin 3) build/aix/buildaix.ksh -- configure fails with foll 09 Feb 2012 02:38:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408655 sounds good for me. Apologies for confusion! On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:40 08 Feb 2012 13:54:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408649 On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Michael Felt <mamfelt@gmail.com> wrote: > I was assuming that "worker.c" was the code that spawned the threads. > (rem 08 Feb 2012 13:33:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408648 Otherwise I see this... root@x105:[/data/prj/httpd-2.2.22]apachectl -l Compiled in modules: core.c prefork.c http_core.c mod_so.c root@x105:[ 08 Feb 2012 13:12:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408647 I was assuming that "worker.c" was the code that spawned the threads. (remember, this is 2.2.22, not 2.4.0, in case that makes any difference) So, pl 08 Feb 2012 12:40:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408646 On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Michael Felt <mamfelt@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, ..., removed external apr, just to be sure it was "the same as before" 08 Feb 2012 12:27:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408645 On Feb 8, 2012, at 2:11 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 2/8/2012 7:44 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> I have no desire, on the other-hand, to hol 08 Feb 2012 12:02:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408641 Well, ..., removed external apr, just to be sure it was "the same as before" For simplicity, I am thinking of MPM as multi-threaded versus single-thr 08 Feb 2012 12:02:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408640 On 2/8/2012 7:44 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I have no desire, on the other-hand, to hold a T&R for the > "deprecate --with-included-apr" patch sinc 08 Feb 2012 11:11:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408639 On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Michael Felt <mamfelt@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, just slightly confused. > On my system I have "tested" in as much as 08 Feb 2012 08:57:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408638 > FYI: I am working on getting a build for a svn client as well. In my experience, java-based svnkit is easy and keeps you out of screwing up package 08 Feb 2012 08:52:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408637 Well, just slightly confused. On my system I have "tested" in as much as I can https://hostname and it says "It works!". What I need some assistence w 08 Feb 2012 08:47:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408636 On Feb 8, 2012, at 9:51 AM, Rüdiger Plüm wrote: > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/configure.in > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/br 08 Feb 2012 07:56:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408635 Hi, Bill, There seems to be some minor script problems to build a Win-x64 version of httpd 2.2.22. Here is a brief report for your confirmation. Fil 08 Feb 2012 07:05:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408634 Author: jim Date: Wed Feb 8 13:48:19 2012 New Revision: 1241897 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1241897&view=rev Log: Correct the --with_inclu 08 Feb 2012 06:51:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408633 On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Michael Felt <mamfelt@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, it was building "something". I'll try the proposed change and make > s 08 Feb 2012 06:40:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408632 On 08 Feb 2012, at 4:08 PM, Michael Felt wrote: > Well, it was building "something". I'll try the proposed change and make sure it is still giving me 08 Feb 2012 06:22:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408631 --enable-mpms-shared=all \ will not work with 2.2. Only 2.4 and up. With 2.2 you still need - --with-mpm=worker Regards Rüdiger 08 Feb 2012 06:12:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408625 Well, it was building "something". I'll try the proposed change and make sure it is still giving me "all" the mods. FYI - I have added --enable-ssl (s 08 Feb 2012 06:08:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408624 +1: Rüdiger, Gün, jim, Rainer, noel.butler, jblond -1: wrowe, Graham, nick, gstein, stefen, kaspar, mamfelt So it looks like, both binding and bindin 08 Feb 2012 05:44:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408623 On 2/7/2012 7:15 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Feb 7, 2012, at 12:51 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > >> On 2/6/2012 5:19 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote 07 Feb 2012 12:26:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408610 The buildaix.ksh script committed recently had some outdated options or requirements, and didn't build loadable MPMs. Suggested changes are below. D 07 Feb 2012 11:09:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408608 I do not understand your patch either :p @ me, I am working on a seperate build/aix for apr and will "depend" on that for build/aix with httpd as well 07 Feb 2012 08:25:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408607 FWIW, I have a hack between make/make install w/ DESTDIR in my 22x AIX builds for this. I think it's probably better as Graham says to not build w/ b 07 Feb 2012 07:28:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408605 On 07 Feb 2012, at 4:03 PM, Michael Felt wrote: > Unfortunately, while installing coreutils fixed it for 2.3.16/2.4.0, it is still 'broken' for 2.2.2 07 Feb 2012 06:47:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408604 Unfortunately, while installing coreutils fixed it for 2.3.16/2.4.0, it is still 'broken' for 2.2.22 I have used both the AIXToolBox version - (ancie 07 Feb 2012 06:03:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408602 On Feb 7, 2012, at 12:51 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 2/6/2012 5:19 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> On 2/5/2012 1:10 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrot 07 Feb 2012 05:15:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408601 oops - should have been: -1: get it done (i.e. remove) For what my vote is worth (nada I expect ;) , as I do not 'contribute', > just package): > + 07 Feb 2012 02:30:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408597 On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:51 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>wrote: > On 2/6/2012 5:19 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > On 2/5/2012 1:10 PM, 06 Feb 2012 23:47:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408594 On 2/6/2012 5:19 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > On 2/5/2012 1:10 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> How about >> >> 1. deprecating --with-included-apr s 06 Feb 2012 21:51:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408593 On 2/5/2012 1:10 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > How about > > 1. deprecating --with-included-apr syntax for... > > 2. --build-apr=/path syntax, 06 Feb 2012 15:19:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408590 On Feb 5, 2012, at 2:10 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > How about > > 1. deprecating --with-included-apr syntax for... > > 2. --build-apr=/path s 06 Feb 2012 06:04:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408576 On 2/5/2012 1:14 PM, Mads Toftum wrote: > On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 01:10:03PM -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> How about >> >> 1. deprecating --w 05 Feb 2012 11:28:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408555 On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 01:10:03PM -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > How about > > 1. deprecating --with-included-apr syntax for... > > 2. --b 05 Feb 2012 11:14:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408554 On 2/5/2012 5:15 AM, Kaspar Brand wrote: > > The only thing which is a bit unfortunate is the currrent naming of the > "--with-included-apr" configur 05 Feb 2012 11:10:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408553 Hello I was helping triaging apache2 bugs reports in Debian and found that one: http://bugs.debian.org/564722 > Running "htdigest -c <file> <domain> 05 Feb 2012 05:52:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408545 On 05/02/2012 11:08, Kaspar Brand wrote: > On 04.02.2012 15:27, Dr Stephen Henson wrote: >> IMHO to avoid these problems it would be better if mod_ssl 05 Feb 2012 05:11:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408544 On 04.02.2012 20:50, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > Kaspar, your vote is very confusing, Sorry about that. Trying again - this is my vote: > [ ] +1: 05 Feb 2012 03:15:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408543 On 04.02.2012 15:27, Dr Stephen Henson wrote: > IMHO to avoid these problems it would be better if mod_ssl could send an > arbitrary number of certifi 05 Feb 2012 03:08:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408542 +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bugzilla Bug ID 04 Feb 2012 23:15:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408540 On 2/4/2012 2:07 AM, Kaspar Brand wrote: > On 03.02.2012 20:55, Stefan Fritsch wrote: >> On Thursday 02 February 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> [ ] 04 Feb 2012 11:50:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408531 The way mod_ssl currently handles certificates and private keys is rather restrictive and means some of OpenSSL's current and planned future features 04 Feb 2012 06:27:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408529 On 04/02/2012 07:32, Kaspar Brand wrote: > On 02.02.2012 15:13, Dr Stephen Henson wrote: >> >> int SSL_CTX_config(SSL_CTX *ctx, const char *config_nam 04 Feb 2012 06:10:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408528 FanTAStic!!! On Feb 4, 2012, at 5:11 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > On Saturday 04 February 2012, Gregg Smith wrote: > >> This fixes the crash, thanks. 04 Feb 2012 05:59:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408527 On 02 Feb 2012, at 4:13 PM, Dr Stephen Henson wrote: > So my thoughts are that this concept could be generalised. > > A simple answer is to add new 04 Feb 2012 03:47:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408523 On Saturday 04 February 2012, Gregg Smith wrote: > This fixes the crash, thanks. Thanks. Committed to trunk and 2.4 04 Feb 2012 02:11:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408522 On 03.02.2012 20:55, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > On Thursday 02 February 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> [ ] +1: Bundle apr/apu w/ Apache httpd 2.4.x >> 04 Feb 2012 00:07:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408518 On 02.02.2012 15:13, Dr Stephen Henson wrote: > So perhaps: > > int SSL_CTX_set_config_string(SSL_CTX *ctx, > const cha 03 Feb 2012 23:32:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408517 On 2/3/2012 10:43 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > On Thursday 02 February 2012, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> On 2/2/2012 8:36 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> 03 Feb 2012 22:11:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408512 On 02/04/2012 12:27 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 2/3/2012 12:51 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: >> a way of monitoring a cluster of servers and opening 03 Feb 2012 15:47:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408511 On 2/3/2012 12:51 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: > On 2/3/2012 9:35 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> On 1/3/2012 2:22 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote: >>> Since I h 03 Feb 2012 15:27:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408510 On 2/3/2012 12:27 PM, Dr Stephen Henson wrote: > Hmm... the ENGINE code is careful not to shutdown an ENGINE if keys exist which > make use of it. > > 03 Feb 2012 14:57:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408509 On 03.02.2012 19:51, Gregg Smith wrote: > On 2/3/2012 9:35 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> On 1/3/2012 2:22 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote: >>> Since I ha 03 Feb 2012 12:50:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408506 On Thursday 02 February 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote: > [ ] +1: Bundle apr/apu w/ Apache httpd 2.4.x > [ ] +0: I don't care > [X] -1: Do not bundle 03 Feb 2012 11:55:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408500 Remember the CHIL engine cleanup was fixed to prevent a dangling cleanup function pointer... I forget which OpenSSL version got that fix but in any ca 03 Feb 2012 11:41:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408499 Here is what I am testing: I am using (currently one) mod_proxy_fcgi member in a balancer to php-fpm. I have already run into some issues with fcgi:// 03 Feb 2012 11:32:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408498 On Thursday 02 February 2012, Joe Orton wrote: > The combination of APR_SUCCESS and DECLINED is unusual; an int > return value with OK/DECLINED? Inp 03 Feb 2012 11:13:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408497 On 2/3/2012 9:35 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 1/3/2012 2:22 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote: >> Since I have been the most vocal about this watchdog/h 03 Feb 2012 10:51:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408496 Mladen, It is fixed, r1210449 did the trick. Once that extra Win32 pid check was removed, the watchdog takes steps, heatbeat beats & heartmonitor m 03 Feb 2012 10:46:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408495 On Thursday 02 February 2012, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 2/2/2012 8:36 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > bb == NULL ?? > > Looking at his attached sc 03 Feb 2012 10:43:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408494 On 03/02/2012 17:45, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > On 2/2/2012 1:02 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> Since this happens with every attempt to start, I suspect i 03 Feb 2012 10:27:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408493 On 2/2/2012 1:02 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Since this happens with every attempt to start, I suspect it has nothing > to do with the new directive a 03 Feb 2012 09:45:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408484 On 2/3/2012 4:46 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Feb 3, 2012, at 4:25 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> mod_slotmem cannot work on windows by de 03 Feb 2012 09:39:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408483 On 1/3/2012 2:22 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote: > Since I have been the most vocal about this watchdog/hearmonitor/heartbeats on windows ... > I should chi 03 Feb 2012 09:35:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408482 On 01/03/2012 09:22 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote: > Since I have been the most vocal about this watchdog/hearmonitor/heartbeats on windows ... I should ch 03 Feb 2012 06:45:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408477 On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 03:06:03PM +0100, Mladen Turk wrote: > > Well actually I think that there could be multiple server_rec > for which ap_get_mod 03 Feb 2012 06:21:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408476 On 02/03/2012 02:45 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Feb 3, 2012, at 8:03 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: >> >> Right, seems that's not the reason for PR52402. 03 Feb 2012 06:06:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408475 On Feb 3, 2012, at 8:03 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: > > Right, seems that's not the reason for PR52402. > Found the fix for it. The reason is the loop: > 03 Feb 2012 05:45:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408474 On 02 Feb 2012, at 8:20 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> [ ] +1: Bundle apr/apu w/ Apache httpd 2.4.x >>> [ ] +0: I don't care >>> [X] -1: Do not bundle 03 Feb 2012 05:15:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408473 On 02/03/2012 11:46 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Feb 3, 2012, at 4:25 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> mod_slotmem cannot work on windows by d 03 Feb 2012 05:03:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408472 Under Win32, do the 2 processes know which is which? On Feb 3, 2012, at 5:46 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Feb 3, 2012, at 4:25 AM, Mladen Turk w 03 Feb 2012 05:02:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408471 On Feb 3, 2012, at 4:25 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: > Hi, > > mod_slotmem cannot work on windows by design. > > On windows we have two processes so the 03 Feb 2012 02:46:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408463  [x] +1: Bundle apr/apu w/ Apache httpd 2.4.x  [ ] +0: I don't care  [ ] -1: Do not bundle apr/apu with Apache httpd 2.4.x 03 Feb 2012 02:43:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408462 Hi, mod_slotmem cannot work on windows by design. On windows we have two processes so the storage->grab/slotmem_grab will always fail because the in 03 Feb 2012 01:25:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408461 On 02.02.2012 23:48, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 2/2/2012 4:18 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: >> >> Hmmm, no clear consensus until now. > > Consensus? Lo 02 Feb 2012 23:06:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408458 On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 09:54 -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > [X] +1: Bundle apr/apu w/ Apache httpd 2.4.x > [ ] +0: I don't care > [ ] -1: Do 02 Feb 2012 18:09:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408455 On 2/2/2012 4:18 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > > Hmmm, no clear consensus until now. Consensus? Looks pretty split so far :) Or do you mean you had no 02 Feb 2012 14:48:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408448 On 02.02.2012 15:54, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I'm calling a vote to get consensus on whether we should continue > to bundle apr/apu with httpd 2.4.x. > 02 Feb 2012 14:18:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/408447