Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 23 Nov 2009 10:25:48 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com> wrote: > a) update mod_ssl as well, at the same time getting rid of the > requiremen 23 Nov 2009 09:06:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377353 I would like to discuss a collaborative effort to get this module working. -----Original Message----- From: christian4apache@lists.muthpartners.de [m 23 Nov 2009 07:09:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377351 On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:40 AM, <christian4apache@lists.muthpartners.de> wrote: > Hello, > > We have an internal project where we need the MPM module 23 Nov 2009 04:09:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377337 Last version from trunk Jim Jagielski wrote: > On Nov 19, 2009, at 12:12 PM, Nick Gearls wrote: > >> I'm not sure this is really desired: >> >> 1. 23 Nov 2009 03:42:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377336 2009/11/23 <christian4apache@lists.muthpartners.de>: > Hello, > > We have an internal project where we need the MPM module perchild. The > Apache 2.0 23 Nov 2009 01:45:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377332 Hello, We have an internal project where we need the MPM module perchild. The Apache 2.0 documentation says that the development is not completed. I 23 Nov 2009 01:40:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377331 +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bugzilla Bug ID 22 Nov 2009 15:08:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377323 +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bugzilla Bug ID 22 Nov 2009 15:08:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377322 On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:44:54 +0100 Ruediger Pluem <rpluem@apache.org> wrote: > > > On 11/21/2009 02:43 AM, Takashi Sato wrote: > > Current KeepAliv 22 Nov 2009 06:36:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377311 See http://people.apache.org/~trawick/mutex-directive-1.txt This follows Joe's suggestion for one new Mutex directive utilizing existing ap_parse_mut 21 Nov 2009 14:24:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377297 On 11/20/2009 04:46 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: >> >> PATCHES TO BACKPORT THAT ARE ON HOLD OR NOT GOING ANYWHERE SOON: > > Thanks Rüdiger, I added the 21 Nov 2009 00:47:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377273 On 11/21/2009 02:43 AM, Takashi Sato wrote: > Current KeepAlive dirctive accept anything but "Off" or "0" > as "On" for compatibility, > The change fr 21 Nov 2009 00:44:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377272 Current KeepAlive dirctive accept anything but "Off" or "0" as "On" for compatibility, The change from 0/1 to Off/On was done in 1.3 or before. I'd li 20 Nov 2009 17:43:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377268 On Nov 19, 2009, at 12:12 PM, Nick Gearls wrote: > I'm not sure this is really desired: > > 1. More or less normal/abnormal case: > s/123/abc123def/ 20 Nov 2009 13:46:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377252 Dong Wang wrote: > Yes, I need... The company I served do not want to lose any flow... > > I think I can config the httpd to not compress the respon 20 Nov 2009 08:01:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377238 On 20.11.2009 13:09, rpluem@apache.org wrote: > Author: rpluem > Date: Fri Nov 20 12:09:17 2009 > New Revision: 882528 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org 20 Nov 2009 07:46:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377237 Yes, I need... The company I served do not want to lose any flow... I think I can config the httpd to not compress the response to Netscape 4.0.x. Ma 20 Nov 2009 06:22:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377236 On 11/20/09, basteon <basteon@gmail.com> wrote: > g' time of day 2 every1, > my question to implies of wider http proto, e.g. I needs add to http > 20 Nov 2009 06:19:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377235 g' time of day 2 every1, my question to implies of wider http proto, e.g. I needs add to http few headers looks like POST and GET, it must be used onl 20 Nov 2009 06:03:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377226 This is because of the specific configuration used there and works as designed. (Header append Vary User-Agent env=!dont-vary) Do you really have a n 20 Nov 2009 05:59:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377225 On 11/20/09, Dong Wang <wangdong.08@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks very much. > > But I found a problem, see this page: > http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/ 20 Nov 2009 05:57:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377224 Thanks very much. But I found a problem, see this page: http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/general/apache-mod_deflate-and-mod_cache-issues.htm 20 Nov 2009 05:49:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377222 Dong Wang wrote: > but mod_compress can cache the compressed file, not only the original file. > the mod_cache can only cache the original file, isn' 20 Nov 2009 05:30:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377221 but mod_compress can cache the compressed file, not only the original file. the mod_cache can only cache the original file, isn't it? I want a module 20 Nov 2009 05:21:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377220 Jeff Trawick wrote: > enable session cache by default? > > change SSLMutex default to "SSLMutex default" instead of "SSLMutex none"? > (does this de 20 Nov 2009 05:13:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377223 Use mod_cache for this. Regards Rüdiger ________________________________ From: Dong Wang [mailto:wangdong.08@gmail.com] Sent: 20 Nov 2009 05:07:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377219 Lighttpd's mod_compress can not only compress file, but also cache it. Can Apache do the same thing? 20 Nov 2009 05:03:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377218 Joe Orton wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 04:05:34PM +0100, Hartmut Keil wrote: >> With the proposed change, we prevent request splitting attacks bas 20 Nov 2009 04:40:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377217 On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Joe Orton <jorton@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 06:47:56AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> I envisioned 19 Nov 2009 12:52:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377183 On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Joe Orton <jorton@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 07:29:46AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> - For mod_da 19 Nov 2009 12:29:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377182 I'm not sure this is really desired: 1. More or less normal/abnormal case: s/123/abc123def/ -> "*123*" becomes "abcabc123defdef" Substitution is mad 19 Nov 2009 09:12:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377170 On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 07:29:46AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > - For mod_dav in httpd trunk/future 2.4: > http://people.apache.org/~trawick/mod_dav_e 19 Nov 2009 08:41:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377169 Joe Orton wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 04:05:34PM +0100, Hartmut Keil wrote: >> > [...] From my point of view without >> > drawbacks, since 'pip 19 Nov 2009 08:41:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377168 On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 06:47:56AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > I envisioned the conf (perhaps a vendor conf) declaring something like > > MutexDir l 19 Nov 2009 08:09:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377162 On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 04:05:34PM +0100, Hartmut Keil wrote: > With the proposed change, we prevent request splitting attacks based > on the TSL ren 19 Nov 2009 07:58:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377161 Joe Orton wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 06:12:41PM +0100, Hartmut Keil wrote: >> The client must stop and wait for the response in any case, otherw 19 Nov 2009 07:05:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377160 On 09.11.2009 23:28, Rainer Jung wrote: > I did a first try on backporting the CVE-2009-3555 patch to 2.0: > > http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patche 19 Nov 2009 04:08:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377140 On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Joe Orton <jorton@redhat.com> wrote: >> On 19 Nov 2009 04:03:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377139 On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Joe Orton <jorton@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 01:18:55PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> A. simplistic 19 Nov 2009 03:47:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377138 On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 06:12:41PM +0100, Hartmut Keil wrote: > The client must stop and wait for the response in any case, otherwise the > response o 19 Nov 2009 01:30:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377133 On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 01:18:55PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > A. simplistic goal: Just make it simple for modules with no special > issues or love o 19 Nov 2009 01:23:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377132 On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 09:54:34AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > enable session cache by default? Yes! I've been moving towards this goal - creating 19 Nov 2009 01:00:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377129 On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com> wrote: > This should be good enough to get rid of AcceptMutex, LockFile, and > the 18 Nov 2009 12:50:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377116 Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote: > Dr Stephen Henson wrote: >> Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote: >>> Joe Orton wrote: >>>> Please file a bug and attach all of: > 18 Nov 2009 12:25:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377115 On 11/18/2009 08:32 PM, Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote: > Stefan Fritsch wrote: >> I cannot reproduce the problems. With an openssl that rejects all >> re 18 Nov 2009 11:47:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377107 Stefan Fritsch wrote: > I cannot reproduce the problems. With an openssl that rejects all > renegotiations, both reconnections after ssl session timeo 18 Nov 2009 11:32:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377106 Dear Apache developer, (this is related to Apache bugzilla 46270) I'm attempting to build a FIPS compliant version of Apache 2.2.14. I've app 18 Nov 2009 11:01:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377105 A. simplistic goal: Just make it simple for modules with no special issues or love of complexity. Provide these directives to set global defaults for 18 Nov 2009 10:18:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377104 Justin came up with it but wants Tony Stevenson to be blamed for it. :-) The docs look good to me. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 18, 2009, at 6:51 AM, 18 Nov 2009 07:32:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377096 Justin came up with it but wants Tony Stevenson to be blamed for it. :-) The docs look good to me. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 18, 2009, at 6:51 AM, 18 Nov 2009 07:32:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377097 On 11/18/2009 03:54 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > enable session cache by default? +1 Cheers Jean-Frederic 18 Nov 2009 07:02:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377095 enable session cache by default? change SSLMutex default to "SSLMutex default" instead of "SSLMutex none"? (does this default to "none" to avoid chec 18 Nov 2009 06:54:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377094 Torsten Foertsch wrote: > If > your/authentication/ is a resource that generates a directory listing > via mod_autoindex then apache issues a subrequ 18 Nov 2009 05:41:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377086 Dr Stephen Henson wrote: > Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote: >> Joe Orton wrote: >>> Please file a bug and attach all of: >>> >>> a) error_log output at "Lo 18 Nov 2009 05:34:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377085 On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com> wrote: >> O 18 Nov 2009 04:29:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377084 On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com> wrote: > This patch applies against the 2.2 branch > and adds the AuthLDAPBind 18 Nov 2009 03:51:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377079 On Nov 17, 2009, at 21:49 , William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > Roy T. Fielding wrote: >> I personally find it useful to continue having support for >> feat 18 Nov 2009 03:27:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377078 > This patch applies against the 2.2 branch > and adds the AuthLDAPBindAuthoritative directive, > which allows infra to failover login requests > to f 17 Nov 2009 20:49:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377074 This patch applies against the 2.2 branch and adds the AuthLDAPBindAuthoritative directive, which allows infra to failover login requests to file base 17 Nov 2009 19:34:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377072 Roy T. Fielding wrote: > I personally find it useful to continue having support for > features that were once used in the past, specifically to > test 17 Nov 2009 18:49:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377071 I personally find it useful to continue having support for features that were once used in the past, specifically to test things that once worked to s 17 Nov 2009 16:12:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377069 Hi, Gregg L. Smith schrieb: > Lars Eilebrecht wrote: >> Or just use the 2.2 modules with 2.4. > > It was just my recent findings with 2.3.3-alpha tha 17 Nov 2009 12:52:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377065 Lars Eilebrecht wrote: > Or just use the 2.2 modules with 2.4. It was just my recent findings with 2.3.3-alpha that this will not work. If the APR 1. 17 Nov 2009 12:33:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377064 Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote: > Joe Orton wrote: >> Please file a bug and attach all of: >> >> a) error_log output at "LogLevel debug" for that case >> 17 Nov 2009 11:31:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377063 Joe Orton wrote: > Please file a bug and attach all of: > > a) error_log output at "LogLevel debug" for that case > b) the config snipping that you're 17 Nov 2009 11:25:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377062 Rainer Jung wrote: > In the presence of the > session ticket extension, session IDs observed on the server are no > longer a good measurement for ses 17 Nov 2009 11:03:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377061 Joe Orton wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:42:40AM +0100, Hartmut Keil wrote: >> Joe Orton wrote: >>> This would break HTTP pipelining over SSL (fo 17 Nov 2009 09:12:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377050 On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Felipe Alcacibar <falcacibar@gmail.com> wr 17 Nov 2009 07:28:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377041 On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:42:40AM +0100, Hartmut Keil wrote: > Joe Orton wrote: > > This would break HTTP pipelining over SSL (for affected configura 17 Nov 2009 05:08:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377035 It has taken a while for me to figure out what I was doing wrong - but that seems to be resolved. I have a build of apache2.2.14 ready. But rather th 17 Nov 2009 03:31:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377030 Hi Joe Joe Orton wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 09:59:12PM +0100, Hartmut Keil wrote: >> With the change described in https://issues.apache.org/bug 17 Nov 2009 02:42:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377029 On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:06:32AM +0100, "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group" wrote: > I now see the following warning: > > ssl_engine_kernel.c: In function 17 Nov 2009 01:55:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377025 On 17/11/09 10:06, "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group" wrote: > I now see the following warning: > > ssl_engine_kernel.c: In function `ssl_callback_Info': > ssl 17 Nov 2009 01:50:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377024 I now see the following warning: ssl_engine_kernel.c: In function `ssl_callback_Info': ssl_engine_kernel.c:1943: warning: passing arg 1 of `SSL_state 17 Nov 2009 01:06:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377023 On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 09:59:12PM +0100, Hartmut Keil wrote: > With the change described in https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48204 16 Nov 2009 14:19:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377007 On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:51 PM, <trawick@apache.org> wrote: > Author: trawick > Date: Mon Nov 16 21:51:01 2009 > New Revision: 880981 > > URL: http: 16 Nov 2009 14:07:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377006 On 16.11.2009 20:21, Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote: > Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote: > An interesting point is that firefox is *not* reusing the ssl session 16 Nov 2009 14:03:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377005 On 16.11.2009 13:14, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Danny Sadinoff <danny@sadinoff.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:47 16 Nov 2009 13:49:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377004 Hi everybody for clarification of https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48204 a more detailed explanation of the described attack scena 16 Nov 2009 12:59:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/377003 On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 08:21:20PM +0100, Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote: > Ok, so in fact I have one apache instance available locally with a > problem 16 Nov 2009 12:13:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376998 On Mon 16 Nov 2009, Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote: > Here's the wireshark captured exchange between the client and server, > note that "Hello Request" al 16 Nov 2009 11:58:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376997 I'll try to do another 2.3.x on next Tuesday, the 24th. We can vote on it over thanksgiving :-) Thanks, Paul 16 Nov 2009 11:33:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376996 Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote: > Everyone who uses client certificate authentication knows that they are > many apache configurations around that will fo 16 Nov 2009 11:21:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376995 On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Sander Temme <sctemme@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > Definitely not the right list: this is where we discuss deve 16 Nov 2009 11:05:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376994 Hi Kevin, Definitely not the right list: this is where we discuss development of the Apache HTTP Server code. users@httpd.apache.org may be a bette 16 Nov 2009 08:11:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376991 On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 02:00:47AM +0000, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > What we really need is 1) a pub/priv key pair of such a cert* (or use > att 16 Nov 2009 06:51:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376990 > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Danny Sadinoff > <danny.sadinoff@gmail.com> wrote: > 2) Virtual hosts > The above item holds true even across virtua 16 Nov 2009 06:48:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376989 On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 8:10 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. > <wrowe@rowe-clan.net 16 Nov 2009 06:37:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376988 On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 08:42 -0500, Sweere, Kevin E CTR USAF AFRL/RYT wrote: > Greetings, > > I work for the US Air Force. We have a prototype that 16 Nov 2009 06:18:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376976 I support you! 2009/11/16 Sweere, Kevin E CTR USAF AFRL/RYT <Kevin.Sweere@wpafb.af.mil> > Greetings, > > I work for the US Air Force. We have a pro 16 Nov 2009 06:08:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376975 On Nov 16, 2009, at 5:52 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: > Regarding xml data, it is my long standing wish to create > log output filter sub module system wher 16 Nov 2009 06:04:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376974 Greetings,   I work for the US Air Force.  We have a prototype that dramatically, fundamentally increases a web server's security.    We run an Apach 16 Nov 2009 05:42:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376973 Stefan Fritsch wrote: > On Tuesday 10 November 2009, Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote: >> [ Apache + openssl 0.9.8l = TLS renegotiation fully disabled ] >> 16 Nov 2009 04:26:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376972 On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Danny Sadinoff <danny@sadinoff.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Danny Sadinoff <danny@sadinoff.com> wro 16 Nov 2009 04:14:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376965 On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Felipe Alcacibar <falcacibar@gmail.com> wrote: > ... >> When comparing modes of PHP execution: >> >> - CGI and FastCG 16 Nov 2009 04:06:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376964 I am trying to use apache-2.3's mod_proxy_fcgi in 2.2.13. It seems to be built and run all right. But I have noticed that the SCRIPT_FILENAME has bee 16 Nov 2009 03:15:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376963 On 16/11/09 11:33, Mark Watts wrote: > > The statistics one gets from both /balancer-manager and mod_status are > useful but of course only exist unti 16 Nov 2009 02:52:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376962 The statistics one gets from both /balancer-manager and mod_status are useful but of course only exist until httpd is restarted. It would be nice if 16 Nov 2009 02:33:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376961 On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Danny Sadinoff <danny@sadinoff.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:53 AM, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com> wrot 16 Nov 2009 02:03:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376955 ... > When comparing modes of PHP execution: > > - CGI and FastCGI are directly comparable because the information that > Apache needs to pass to PHP 15 Nov 2009 22:04:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376942