Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 16 May 2008 18:11:41 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg On May 13, 2008, at 12:30 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > On 05/13/2008 04:21 AM, fielding@apache.org wrote: >> >> - gid = atoi(target_gname); >> - 16 May 2008 15:46:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351687 So I have some more information about this, but this time related to having keepalives OFF in mod_proxy. I tried using the "SetEnv proxy-nokeepalive 16 May 2008 14:21:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351686 The debian gaffe also affects any 'req's or self-signed certs created on the affected platform. Unfortunately the blacklists generated by folks are 16 May 2008 13:11:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351684 On May 15, 2008, at 3:00 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > On 05/15/2008 05:29 AM, BOYA SUN wrote: >> Here is another potential bug we've just discover 16 May 2008 05:06:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351665 On tor, 2008-05-15 at 21:07 +0100, John ORourke wrote: > This error would typically happen on a busy site with a full log > partition. Writing to sy 16 May 2008 02:34:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351663 Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On tor, 2008-05-15 at 21:00 +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > >>> \apache\src\log.c(682): apr_file_puts(errstr, logf 15 May 2008 13:07:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351658 On 05/15/2008 09:44 PM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On tor, 2008-05-15 at 21:00 +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >>> \apache\src\log.c(682): apr_fil 15 May 2008 13:04:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351657 On tor, 2008-05-15 at 21:00 +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > \apache\src\log.c(682): apr_file_puts(errstr, logf); > > I see nothing reasonabl 15 May 2008 12:44:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351656 On 05/15/2008 05:29 AM, BOYA SUN wrote: > Here is another potential bug we've just discovered, and it seems to be occured in several places. Please al 15 May 2008 12:00:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351654 The response to TRACE when "TraceEnable Off" is not used on an EBCDIC platform is partially in ASCII and partially in EBCDIC (part readable, part garb 15 May 2008 10:54:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351653 Here is another potential bug we've just discovered, and it seems to be occured in several places. Please also take a look at it if interested, thanks 14 May 2008 20:20:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351629 On 05/14/2008 10:19 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > BOYA SUN wrote: > >> *BUG#1* >> *Category: 1* >> *File Name:* /httpd-2.2.8/support/ab.c *Function Name 14 May 2008 13:43:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351618 Dear Paul, Thank you so much for replying to the email. It seems that our approach is accurate in finding bugs of Category 1, but not so accurate for 14 May 2008 13:40:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351617 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Yes, but as stated in my email, suphp uses cgi, which I don't like (unnecessary exec()'s), and is the e 14 May 2008 13:22:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351616 BOYA SUN wrote: > Dear Apache-HTTPD developers, > > I am a Ph.D student in the Software Engineering Research Group of EECS > department in Case Wes 14 May 2008 13:19:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351615 Dear Apache-HTTPD developers, I am a Ph.D student in the Software Engineering Research Group of EECS department in Case Western Reserve University, 14 May 2008 11:44:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351609 Hi, >>> How do you think about this idea ? do you already know this: http://www.suphp.org/ Guenter. 14 May 2008 10:51:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351608 HTTP User and Desktop Security Communities; With respect to http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/29112 Per http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt 3.7.1 Ca 14 May 2008 10:27:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351607 Nick Gearls wrote: > > Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability when displaying the 403 > Forbidden error page > I can't find any info about this is 14 May 2008 10:14:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351605 > Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability when displaying the 403 Forbidden error page I can't find any info about this issue on the site. I guess 14 May 2008 04:35:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351590 > I see no issues with making this the default and having a --disable-dtrace. > I can see a reason that someone might wish to turn them off -- thoug 13 May 2008 17:49:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351565 If you are just catching up: http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2008-0166 http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/05/13/1533212 Most of the tal 13 May 2008 14:18:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351562 I know that the following patch really requires some work to review, but it is missing only one vote and it would be really worth to be included in 2. 13 May 2008 14:02:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351561 On 05/13/2008 04:21 AM, fielding@apache.org wrote: > Author: fielding > Date: Mon May 12 19:21:33 2008 > New Revision: 655711 > > URL: http://svn.apa 13 May 2008 12:30:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351560 On 05/12/2008 08:39 PM, jim@apache.org wrote: > Author: jim > Date: Mon May 12 11:39:34 2008 > New Revision: 655594 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/vi 12 May 2008 13:33:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351478 I haven't looked at the code in mod_proxy to see how it handles the Keep-Alive header returned by the backend server, but what I'm seeing in this tcpd 12 May 2008 13:15:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351477 On Mon, 12 May 2008 13:52:18 -0400 "Adam Woodworth" <mirkperl@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if anyone might have some more information 12 May 2008 12:31:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351476 Reading over the bug I'm still curious about the actual "race condition" aspect of it... Even doing an 'OPTIONS *' "right before" sending the request 12 May 2008 11:17:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351464 Hi, I was wondering if anyone might have some more information on bug #37770. I've added a comment there recently, at the end of the bug report, #83 12 May 2008 10:52:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351463 +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bugzilla Bug ID 11 May 2008 23:08:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351420 +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bugzilla Bug ID 11 May 2008 23:08:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351419 Hello to all, in https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44262 I was told to ask about this issue on dev@httpd.apache.org. Long talk shor 11 May 2008 13:49:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351408 Hello, Afaik it will happen: First it will try to kill you 'softly', and it'll get more agressive after that. So, I think if you exit fast enough a 11 May 2008 11:19:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351406 Hi, this is a question about Apache module development. I'm not sure whether I'm writing to the right mailing list, but this topic doesn't seem belo 11 May 2008 10:21:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351405 Apache developers, I would like to politely ask you to fix Bug 44817: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44817 The patch had been alre 11 May 2008 07:14:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351401 Brad Nicholes wrote: > Trying to build mod_auth_form.c just produces link errors. I can see where > the optional function is imported as ap_session 10 May 2008 15:58:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351395 Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> + if (sent_body && sent_mimetype) { >> + apr_table_set(r->headers_in, "Content-Type", sent_mimetype); >> + 10 May 2008 04:51:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351391 On 05/10/2008 12:15 AM, minfrin@apache.org wrote: > Author: minfrin > Date: Fri May 9 15:15:37 2008 > New Revision: 654958 > > URL: http://svn.apach 09 May 2008 23:13:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351383 William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > I think the bigger idea that mod_cache must handle all rfc related issues > is key. mem and disk cache should never ha 09 May 2008 18:05:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351375 Roy T. Fielding wrote: > Please tell me that the chunk above is a mistaken commit. The chunk above is a mistaken commit. Regards, Graham -- 09 May 2008 16:41:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351374 On May 9, 2008, at 3:40 PM, minfrin@apache.org wrote: > Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_http.c > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewv 09 May 2008 15:58:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351367 Graham Leggett wrote: > Niklas Edmundsson wrote: > >> I'm not convinced that forking the disk cache having two similar ones >> tuned for different u 09 May 2008 15:57:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351366 Niklas Edmundsson wrote: > I'm not convinced that forking the disk cache having two similar ones > tuned for different usecases is a good idea in th 09 May 2008 15:44:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351365 Ruediger Pluem wrote: > Why is this needed? Should this job be performed by the > ap_keep_body_filter that should > be in our input filter chain if 09 May 2008 15:16:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351364 * jim@apache.org wrote: > Author: jim > Date: Fri May 9 06:35:27 2008 > New Revision: 654805 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=654805&view=r 09 May 2008 14:06:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351354 On Fri, 9 May 2008, Graham Leggett wrote: >> There is a lot of valuable stuff in your jumbo patch - but I am not sure >> what the best approach is t 09 May 2008 13:38:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351353 Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > There is a lot of valuable stuff in your jumbo patch - but I am not sure > what the best approach is to fold it in. > 09 May 2008 12:44:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351352 On May 9, 2008, at 1:18 PM, Chris Darroch wrote: > Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> Add in r568323 and 568879. The approved patch >> lacked updates to the d 09 May 2008 11:21:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351347 Jim Jagielski wrote: > Add in r568323 and 568879. The approved patch > lacked updates to the doccos and so really shouldn't > have been approved as i 09 May 2008 10:18:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351344 On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Joshua Slive <joshua@slive.ca> wrote: > Just put it in people.apache.org:/www/www.apache.org/dist/httpd/patches/apply_ 09 May 2008 07:11:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351333 On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 6:57 AM, <trawick@apache.org> wrote: >> Author: traw 09 May 2008 06:26:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351332 Good idea! :-) Iim insterested too. Iñigo > I am nearly finished with the technical review draft of the second > edition of the Apache Pocket Re 09 May 2008 06:01:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351316 Me too! On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Nick Gearls <nickgearls@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm interested > > Regards, > > Nick > > -- My Blogs: http:// 09 May 2008 05:56:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351315 I'm interested Regards, Nick 09 May 2008 05:41:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351314 On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Gregory Boyce <gboyce@badbelly.com> wrote: > Ok, I found the trigger for the bug, but I'm not sure what the correct fi 09 May 2008 05:34:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351313 On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 6:57 AM, <trawick@apache.org> wrote: > Author: trawick > Date: Fri May 9 03:57:46 2008 > New Revision: 654752 > > URL: http:/ 09 May 2008 05:27:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351312 What if "Vary" were much more than just HTTP Vary? It would be nice if the framework could support the "external" vary (ie, "normal" HTTP Vary) as we 09 May 2008 04:50:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351311 I am nearly finished with the technical review draft of the second edition of the Apache Pocket Reference (my deadline for this is 30 May), and am loo 09 May 2008 04:43:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351310 Ok, I found the trigger for the bug, but I'm not sure what the correct fix is. It appears that Apache on SuSE sets AP_DEBUG as part of the EXTRA_CPP 08 May 2008 14:13:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351282 Lazy wrote: > 2008/5/5 Jille Timmermans <jille@quis.cx>: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hello hackers! >> >> I was think 08 May 2008 10:17:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351274 > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Graham Leggett > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. Mai 2008 15:29 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: abort insi 08 May 2008 09:52:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351273 Hi all, While debugging something else entirely I have tripped over an abort() triggered from inside mod_dir when POOL_DEBUG is enabled. It seems w 08 May 2008 06:29:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351265 > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Dirk-Willem van Gulik > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. Mai 2008 22:53 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Carefu 07 May 2008 23:35:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351245 Hello, I'm currently looking to deploy mod_mbox on a SuSE 10 server, and I'm having some issues getting the package to compile. I'm hoping that so 07 May 2008 16:50:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351239 hi all, sorry to enter so later in the discution... i'm ok with you torsten (+1), i think is the good place to do it, think adding hook like pre_ch 07 May 2008 14:33:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351230 Any reason why we never applied https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40169 It looks sensible to me - and would, as a side effe 07 May 2008 13:53:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351226 Niklas, There is a lot of valuable stuff in your jumbo patch - but I am not sure what the best approach is to fold it in. Could you have have a lo 07 May 2008 13:47:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351225 On 05/07/2008 06:25 PM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > Apologies for the size - but about as minimal as I can get it :) > > So the problem I see is: 07 May 2008 12:38:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351224 On May 7, 2008, at 7:01 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On May 7, 2008, at 9:25 AM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > >> But to me allowing caching modules 07 May 2008 12:13:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351217 On May 7, 2008, at 9:31 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On May 7, 2008, at 9:25 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> >> On May 7, 2008, at 9:14 AM, Jim Jagiels 07 May 2008 10:29:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351216 On May 2, 2008, at 11:28 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > Hah, I was reading it like an equation from my discrete math days. > I guess ^ really is less re 07 May 2008 10:03:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351212 On May 7, 2008, at 9:25 AM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > But to me allowing caching modules some knowledge of HTTP is > probably good - as > opti 07 May 2008 10:01:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351211 Apologies for the size - but about as minimal as I can get it :) So the problem I see is: - current caching modules should understand things s 07 May 2008 09:25:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351210 On May 7, 2008, at 9:25 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On May 7, 2008, at 9:14 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> Just a quick FYI: Simply using the FreeBSD 07 May 2008 06:31:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351202 On May 7, 2008, at 9:14 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Just a quick FYI: Simply using the FreeBSD logic flow for > sendfile (ie: adding || defined(DARWIN 07 May 2008 06:25:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351201 Just a quick FYI: Simply using the FreeBSD logic flow for sendfile (ie: adding || defined(DARWIN) and pulling out the existing DARWIN-specific section 07 May 2008 06:14:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351195 > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Jim Jagielski > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. Mai 2008 14:26 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: 2.2.9 > > 07 May 2008 05:47:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351194 On May 7, 2008, at 6:51 AM, Niklas Edmundsson wrote: > On Tue, 6 May 2008, Nick Kew wrote: > >>> 2. Consensus on whether we ship with APR 1.2.x or 07 May 2008 05:26:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351193 On Tue, 6 May 2008, Nick Kew wrote: >> 2. Consensus on whether we ship with APR 1.2.x or 1.3.x... >> My pref would be 1.3. > > -1. I tend 07 May 2008 03:51:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351187 On May 7, 2008, at 11:00 AM, Nick Gearls wrote: > I propose to add the following: > > In the usage: > All config files, logs, etc. are used by the mai 07 May 2008 03:42:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351186 I propose to add the following: In the usage: All config files, logs, etc. are used by the main process and should thus not be stored in the chroot. 07 May 2008 02:00:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351182 Nick Kew wrote: > > If the docs are not clear to you, I think that demonstrates > the need for further review. What is unclear about > ¨The unde 06 May 2008 16:34:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351178 On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 23:56, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Or more specifically, could you elaborate on the dbd changes within > apr 1.3.x that need 06 May 2008 16:20:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351177 Nick Kew wrote: > > The target audience for APR is tech-savvy: developers and > integrators. HTTPD has a larger and more mixed audience. > I'd say t 06 May 2008 15:56:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351176 On Tue, 6 May 2008 09:50:41 -0400 Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com> wrote: > 2. Consensus on whether we ship with APR 1.2.x or 1.3.x... > My 06 May 2008 15:45:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351175 I should have some cycles to dig deeper on this tomorrow... 06 May 2008 13:20:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351173 On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 1:57 PM, <takashi@apache.org> wrote: > + <note type="warning"><title>Note</title> > + <p>This directive will be ign 06 May 2008 11:03:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351168 On May 6, 2008, at 1:53 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Will see how the latest 1.2.x does... > > Uhm - 1.2.x deliberately 06 May 2008 10:59:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351167 Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Will see how the latest 1.2.x does... Uhm - 1.2.x deliberately disables sendfile detection on Darwin. 06 May 2008 10:53:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351166 Hmmm.... at least in apr-1.3.0 (HEAD), sendfile in Darwin still seems broken... getting: [Tue May 06 13:35:26 2008] [crit] [Tue May 06 13:35:26 2 06 May 2008 10:43:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351165 On May 6, 2008, at 8:10 AM, Nick Gearls wrote: > Can you tell me where to find the XML doc file ? > It's not obvious from the site :-( Check out th 06 May 2008 09:36:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351155 On May 6, 2008, at 7:36 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: >> 2. Consensus on whether we ship with APR 1.2.x or 1.3.x... >> My pref would be 06 May 2008 09:33:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351154 On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group < ruediger.pluem@vodafone.com> wrote: > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Jim 06 May 2008 09:26:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351153 Can you tell me where to find the XML doc file ? It's not obvious from the site :-( Thanks, Nick Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > > On May 6, 2008 06 May 2008 08:10:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351148 On May 6, 2008, at 5:03 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: > > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Dirk-Willem van Gulik >> Gesendet: Diensta 06 May 2008 08:09:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351147 > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Dirk-Willem van Gulik > Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Mai 2008 17:00 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Hi 06 May 2008 08:03:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351146 On May 6, 2008, at 4:12 PM, Nick Gearls wrote: > If there's a chance to add it, I'm ready to write the doc patch I did below a while ago. May be use 06 May 2008 08:00:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351145 > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Dirk-Willem van Gulik > Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Mai 2008 16:20 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Hi 06 May 2008 07:44:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351144 > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Jim Jagielski > Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Mai 2008 15:51 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: 2.2.9 > > 06 May 2008 07:36:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351143 On May 6, 2008, at 4:12 PM, Nick Gearls wrote: > If there's a chance to add it, I'm ready to write the doc patch Lets get that in there - and then le 06 May 2008 07:20:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/351142