Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 08 Nov 2009 20:17:44 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Stefan Fritsch wrote on 2009-11-07 11:24:03: > Shouldn't you use something like this? > > BrowserMatch "MSIE [2-5]" nokeepalive ssl-unclean-shutdown 08 Nov 2009 16:53:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376443 +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bugzilla Bug ID 08 Nov 2009 15:08:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376442 +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bugzilla Bug ID 08 Nov 2009 15:08:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376441 Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > >> Actually Steve - you may know - what besides the obvious >> >> extendedKeyUsage=nsSG 08 Nov 2009 04:47:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376436 On 06/11/09 20:07, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> >> I'd like we remove the entire forwarding proxy stuff >> for example. > So we have mod_forward_proxy an 08 Nov 2009 00:56:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376433 On 11/07/2009 08:19 PM, sf@apache.org wrote: > Author: sf > Date: Sat Nov 7 19:19:10 2009 > New Revision: 833738 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/view 07 Nov 2009 17:45:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376432 Kaspar Brand wrote: > Dr Stephen Henson wrote: >> A few comments about that: > > Thanks for the review! > >> These are cryptographic keys (or at lea 07 Nov 2009 09:35:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376421 Dr Stephen Henson wrote: > A few comments about that: Thanks for the review! > These are cryptographic keys (or at least the HMAC and AES keys are) 07 Nov 2009 06:56:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376417 Kaspar Brand wrote: +#if !defined(OPENSSL_NO_TLSEXT) && OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 0x009080d0 +#define TICK_KEYS_LEN sizeof(((SSL_CTX *)0)->tlsext_t 07 Nov 2009 04:21:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376416 Kaspar Brand wrote: > Does that sound reasonable? If so, I would prepare a new patch with > SSL_CTX_set_tlsext_ticket_keys and the new config directiv 07 Nov 2009 03:06:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/376415